Banastre Tarleton

Capture of Charleston

After becoming commander of the British Legion, a force of American Loyalist cavalry and light infantry, Tarleton went to South Carolina at the beginning of 1780. There, the capture of Charleston was the first step in regaining control of the southern provinces. The Legion supported Sir Henry Clinton in the operations which culminated in the British capture of Charleston, earning Tarleton praise in Clinton's despatch.^[13]

Battle of Waxhaws

On 29 May 1780, Colonel Tarleton, with a force of 149 mounted soldiers, overtook a detachment of 350 to 380 Virginia Continentals, led by Colonel Abraham Buford. Buford rejected Tarleton's invitation to surrender and continued marching, only ordering his troops to surrender after incurring significant casualties.^{[dubious – discuss]} Nonetheless, fighting continued until 113 soldiers of Buford's detachment were killed, 203 were captured, and 150 were severely wounded. The British army casualties were 5 soldiers killed and 12 soldiers wounded.^[14]. The affair is known as the Battle of Waxhaw Creek.

During that time, Patriots used the phrase "Tarleton's quarter" (shooting after surrender) as meaning "no quarter offered".

Forty years later, William Dobein James asked Robert Brownfield, a surgeon’s mate of the wartime Second South Carolina Regiment, for a description of the battle. Brownfield's account,^[15] published as an appendix to A Sketch of the Life of Brig. Gen. Francis Marion, said that Colonel Buford raised a white flag of surrender, "expecting the usual treatment sanctioned by civilized warfare". When Buford called for quarter, Colonel Tarleton's horse was shot with a musket ball, trapping him underneath and enraging the Loyalist soldiers who believed their commander had been shot. The Loyalist troops attacked the Virginians and "commenced a scene of indiscriminate carnage never surpassed by the ruthless atrocities of the most barbarous savages"; in the aftermath, the British Legion soldiers purportedly killed wounded soldiers where they lay.^[15]

Reports of these atrocities motivated Whig-leaning colonials to support the American Revolution.^[16] On 7 October 1780, at the Battle of Kings Mountain, South Carolina, the Overmountain Men (rebel militia), having heard of the slaughter at Waxhaw Creek, killed American Loyalists who had surrendered after a sniper killed their British commanding officer, Maj. Patrick Ferguson.^[17]

Subsequent operations

In South Carolina, Tarleton's British Legion were harried by Francis Marion, an American militia commander who practiced guerrilla warfare against the British, in order to deny resupply of food and horses, cause attrition and reduce reconnoitering. Throughout the campaigns, Tarleton was unable to capture Marion or thwart his operations. Marion's local popularity among anti-British South Carolinians ensured continual aid and comfort for the American cause. In contrast, Colonel Tarleton alienated the colonial citizens with arbitrary confiscations of cattle and food stocks.^{[18][failed verification]}

At Camden, Tarleton's cavalry delivered the coup de grace against the Continental army when they charged into the rear of the Continental line. The Continental troops broke and fled, and were pursued for more than twenty miles. All the baggage and ordnance of the Continental army were captured, earning Tarleton a commendation from Cornwallis.^[10]

On 22 August, he was promoted to major in the 79th Regiment of Foot (Royal Liverpool Volunteers).^[19] He defeated Thomas Sumter at Fishing Creek, also called Catawba Fords, but was less successful when he encountered the same general at Blackstock's Farm in November 1780.^[10]

On 17 January 1781, Tarleton's forces were virtually destroyed by American Brigadier General Daniel Morgan at the Battle of Cowpens. Tarleton and about 200 men escaped the battlefield.^[20]

He was successful in a skirmish at Torrence's Tavern while the British crossed the Catawba River (Cowan's Ford Skirmish, 1 February 1781) and took part in the Battle of Guilford Courthouse in March 1781. Tarleton marched into Virginia with his men and Cornwallis^[10] to carry out a series of small expeditions, including a raid on Charlottesville, where the state government had relocated following the British occupation of the capital at Richmond. He was trying to capture Governor Thomas Jefferson and members of the Virginia General Assembly. The raid was partially foiled by the ride of Jack Jouett, with Jefferson and all but seven of the legislators escaping over the mountains. Tarleton destroyed arms and munitions and succeeded in dispersing the Assembly.

Tarleton was brevetted to lieutenant-colonel in the 79th Foot on 26 June 1781.^[21] After other missions, Cornwallis instructed Tarleton to hold Gloucester Point, during the Siege of Yorktown. On 4 October 1781, the French Lauzun's Legion and the British cavalry, commanded by Tarleton, skirmished at Gloucester Point. Tarleton was unhorsed, and Lauzun's Legion drove the British within their lines before being ordered to withdraw by the Marquis de Choisy.^[22][23][24] Lauzun's Legion suffered three Hussars killed with two officers and eleven Hussars wounded.^[25] They reported fifty British were killed or wounded, erroneously including Tarleton.^[26] The British surrendered Gloucester Point to the French and Americans after the surrender at Yorktown in October 1781. He returned to Britain on parole early in 1782.^[10]

Portraiture

Tarleton sat for portraits by three leading artists in London: Reynolds, Gainsborough, and Cosway.^[29]

Tarleton’s brother commissioned Sir Joshua Reynolds' well-known painting of Banastre for their mother.^[b] "Colonel Tarleton", now in the National Gallery, is regarded as one of the finest examples of Reynolds' work and portraiture in general^{[citation needed]}. The full-length 236 cm × 145.5 cm (7 ft 8.9 in × 4 ft 9.3 in) painting is described by the National Gallery:

Reynolds portrays Tarleton momentarily dismounted on a battlefield, with gun-smoke swirling behind him. Wearing the uniform of the British Legion, he props one leg up on a cannon to re-fix his sword to his belt before changing horses. Reynolds frequently drew on ideas from old master paintings, drawings and antique sculpture for his compositions. Tarleton's pose appears to be based on works by Rembrandt, Tintoretto and an ancient Roman sculpture of Hermes.^[30][c]

The pose disguises Tarleton's mutilated right hand, of which he lost two fingers to a musket ball at the Battle of Guilford Court House.^{[31][self-published source?]} The flags are unidentified. The Reynolds painting was shown at the Royal Academy later in the year^{[citation needed]}.

Thomas Gainsborough's equestrian portrait of Tarleton, on an even larger canvas, was also exhibited in 1782.^[32]

The portrait by the third artist, Richard Cosway, is on quite a different scale, as miniatures met the need for images which could be transported easily. His miniature of Banastre Tarleton^[33] is in a private collection and a photograph of it is copyrighted.^{[dubious – discuss]}

Recriminations

While fighting had finished after the capitulation at Yorktown, soldiers and politicians continued the war over words. The London Morning Chronicle printed an anonymous letter castigating Tarleton on 9 August 1782, with Lieutenant Roderick MacKenzie as a likely author.^[34] MacKenzie had been a junior officer of the 71st Regiment of Foot (Fraser's Highlanders). He was wounded and captured at the Battle of Cowpens for which he blamed Tarleton.^[d] Agniel wrote:^[36] "If one takes exception to the premise that Lieutenant MacKenzie loathed his commanding officer, it is entirely feasible to substitute any other verb which means roughly the same thing." Babits noted "Lieutenant Roderick MacKenzie and others had clear bias and slanted their accounts to suit their own purposes ... MacKenzie hated Banastre Tarleton".^[37] Buchanan said Mackenzie "bore considerable personal animosity against Tarleton".^[38]

Subsequent letters extended Mackenzie's criticism to Cornwallis and Clinton, and continued to attack Tarleton for years. As the events of 1781, the year of the defeat at Cowpens and the surrender at Yorktown, were picked apart, the principal actors responded. Clinton's account was first, in 1783. He held that "none of the misfortunes of the very unfortunate campaign of 1781 can, with the smallest degree of justice, be imputed to me."^{[39] [40]} Cornwallis rebutted Clinton's claims the same year.^[41] They continued to trade rhetorical shots for years after the treaty was signed, attempting to prove themselves blameless for the loss of thirteen of the provinces in North America. Responsibility for the events became a subject of general discussion and gossip. Tarleton became a focus of the controversy due to the loss of the light infantry at Cowpens. However, according to Scotti, the criticism of Tarleton "was fuelled by resentment and jealousy".^[42]

Tarleton defended himself in his 1787 book, History of the Campaigns of 1780 and 1781 in the Southern Provinces of North America.^[43] Mackenzie followed by compiling his letters into a book,^[44] and explicitly criticised Tarleton's account almost line by line. The Cornwallis Correspondence also included responses. Major George Hanger (Lord Coleraine) published a rebuttal to Mackenzie in his "Address to the Army".^[45]

Tarleton helmet

During the American War of Independence, Tarleton made popular a leather helmet with antique style applications and a fur plume (woolen for lower ranks) protruding far into the upper front side. It was based on the Continental European dragoon helmet that became popular in several other armies before it fell out of fashion.^[29] Sir Joshua Reynolds' portrait of Tarleton shows him wearing the helmet; it was worn by all ranks in the British Legion. Royal Horse Artillery troops wore the helmet until the end of the Napoleonic Wars, as did light dragoon regiments from about 1796 to 1812.^{[58][better source needed]}

Auction of captured battle flags

In 2006, four Patriot regimental colours captured by Tarleton in 1779 and 1780 were auctioned by Sotheby's in New York City.^[59] The flags sold for US$17.3 million at auction on Flag Day in the United States on 14 June 2006.^[60][61]

Lot 1^[62] was the colour of the 2nd Continental Light Dragoons (Sheldon's Dragoons), captured by the British Legion at Pound Ridge on 2 July 1779. It is the earliest surviving American flag of any kind with thirteen horizontal red and white stripes. Including its silver metallic fringe, the silk flag is 35+1⁄8 inches (hoist) × 38+3⁄4 inches (fly). In the centre, there is a square of red silk bordered in gold and black. On it is a painted badge of a winged dark storm cloud from which ten gold and orange thunderbolts are emanating. Below that is the motto "PAT:A CONCITA  FULM:NT NATI" (roughly translated, "When their country calls, her sons answer in tones of thunder").

Lot 2^[63] was the complete stand of three regimental colours of the 3rd Virginia Detachment. The British Legion, commanded by Tarleton, captured them at the Battle of Waxhaws on 29 May 1780. They are the only remaining intact stand of colours from the Revolution. The 50+1⁄4 inches (hoist) × 45+3⁄8 inches (fly) regimental flag is the oldest surviving American flag having a canton of five-pointed stars. It is of gold silk painted with a beaver felling a palmetto tree. Below that is the motto "Perseverando". At the upper hoist is a blue silk canton with thirteen stars. It is very similar to No. 7 described in the 1778 inventory "A Return of ye New Standards & Division Colours for ye Army of ye United States of America In Possession of Major Jonathan Gostelowe, Comy. Mily. Stores".^{[64][better source needed]}

Places named for Banastre Tarleton

• A house at the site of the skirmish in Easttown Township after the Battle of Brandywine came to be known as Tarleton. A school later based there was also named Tarleton.^[65]
• The General Tarleton Inn in Ferrensby, North Yorkshire, is named after him.^[66]
• A street, still in existence, was named for Banastre Tarleton—others for Howe and Rawdon—in Freetown, the Sierra Leone colony established by former slaves.^[67]

Representation in other media

• In the 1835 novel Horse-Shoe Robinson by John Pendleton Kennedy, a romance during the Southern campaign, characters interact with Tarleton, a forceful martial character, sensitive to the duties of honour and chivalry.
• The 1959–1961 American Disney television series The Swamp Fox is about the American War of Independence. Partisan Francis Marion was played by Canadian actor Leslie Nielsen, while British actor John Sutton portrayed Colonel Banastre Tarleton.
• In the novel Sharpe's Eagle by Bernard Cornwell (the first in the Richard Sharpe series), the novel's main antagonist, Colonel Sir Henry Simmerson, is said to be a cousin of Tarleton. He relies on his cousin's political connections to support his position.
• In the 1986 film Sweet Liberty Tarleton is played by actor Michael Caine and portrayed to the history professor Michael Burgess' (Alan Alda) dismay as a romantic, dashing hero.
• In the 2000 film The Patriot, the fictitious Colonel William Tavington is often said to be based on Tarleton and the hero, Benjamin Martin, on Francis Marion.^{[68][better source needed]} However, this hasn't been confirmed by anyone involved with the script.
• In the 2006 film Amazing Grace, Tarleton is played by Ciarán Hinds and is portrayed as a leading opponent of William Wilberforce's abolition bill.

Slave trade

Banastre Tarleton was not engaged in the slave trade. As a child in Liverpool, he benefited from his father’s mercantile business, which included chartering ships, some of which carried slaves. But, as an adult, he did not join the business.

Tarleton is not listed by the Centre for the Study of the Legacies of British Slavery,^[69] which is based at University College London, nor by the Slave Voyages database,^[70] begun at Emory University, now hosted at Rice University. Furthermore, unlike many of the Patriots he fought, Banastre Tarleton never owned slaves.

Nevertheless, after his election to Parliament in 1790, Tarleton often spoke against the abolition of the slave trade: "most of his speeches in his first two sessions in the House assailed the 'mistaken philanthropy' of abolishing the slave trade, which Liverpool Members were instructed to oppose."^[2]

Wounds

Lee claimed to have wounded Tarleton in Pennsylvania. William Washington was said to have wounded him at the Battle of Cowpens. Tilden reported that Tarleton had been wounded during the siege of Yorktown.^[71] According to Tarleton's history of his service, he was only wounded once, at the Battle of Guilford Courthouse. While his maimed hand was disguised in his famous portrait, he proudly showed it in politics as evidence of having served his country.

Raiders

The British Legion is occasionally referred to as 'Tarleton's Raiders" in modern American sources. However, during its service in the American War of Independence, the British Legion was most often called Tarleton's Legion. Lawrence Babits wrote of the unit’s formation:

These companies were combined into the British Legion in June and July 1778 ... Thereafter, the history of the British Legion, or Tarleton's legion, as it came to be known, was the history of Tarleton in America.^[72]

Modern historians also use that name. For example, in Cavalry of the American Revolution, Jim Piecuch says "Dockerty's statement provides clear evidence of Americans switching sides in the South and Continentals enlisting in Tarleton's Legion."^[73] In the same book, Scott Miskimon writes "Before the Americans could bridle a single horse, Tarleton's Legion charged ..."^[74]

Thomas Raddall, a prolific writer on historical subjects, said of the British Legion:

Of all the loyalists who fought in the War of the American Revolution none were more famous in their day than those who formed the British Legion, generally known as Tarleton's Legion.^[75]

Only after the American Civil War was the British Legion sometimes called "Tarleton's Raiders" by analogy with some Confederate units of that war. Knight explained:

The "Tarleton's raiders" tag occurred with increasing regularity after the American Civil War. Various Confederate partisan and guerrilla cavalry units, like Mosby's and Quantrill's, came to be named after their commanding officers, and [American] writers began following the same fashion with the British Legion, the corps that Tarleton commanded. But the British Legion was never an irregular partisan unit, and though it carried out many daring raids, it was a mixed force of dragoon cavalry, light Infantry and small calibre artillery. Indeed, it was taken onto the British regular establishment in 1782, conferring on it official recognition of its prowess.^[29]

Epithets

In the United States, Banastre Tarleton is often disparaged as "Bloody Tarleton" or "Bloody Ban' in modern histories. But this label was not used by his contemporaries. Scotti searched fruitlessly for examples of "Bloody Tarleton" before the twentieth century. He concluded "with some degree of certainty" that Robert Bass was an early writer to use the term.^[76][77] John Pancake varied it to "Bloody Ban" in 1985.^[78][79] Later, Scotti elaborated:^[80]

In 1957, Robert Duncan Bass coined the phrase in his eloquent biography of Tarleton ... With the publication of The Green Dragoon, "Bloody Tarleton" became a part of the American heritage and the national psyche.

Knight agreed with that origin, saying^[29]

Both labels appear no earlier than the 1950s, originating in the Robert Bass book The Green Dragoon.

and

The two personal monikers, the alternatingly violent and romantic caricatures by which Tarleton is now largely known, are sobriquets of pure fiction. There is no evidence that Tarleton was ever referred to by either name ...

Social rejection by American officers

Several writers have said that, after the surrender, Tarleton was the sole British senior officer not invited to dinner with any American officers. Where a source is given, it is the 1860 book^[81] of George Washington Parke Custis, a step-grandson of General Washington. Custis wrote "Colonel Tarleton ... was left out in the invitations to headquarters." He bases this on an alleged meeting between Tarleton and Lieutenant Colonel John Laurens about military etiquette. Scotti searched many sources, in particular the writing of Laurens and the Marquis de La Fayette, to whom Custis claimed Tarleton first complained. He found no indication that any such meeting took place and considers the incident to be apocryphal.^[82][28] Supporting Scotti's conclusion, a 1978 book about the end of the war, The Campaign That Won America: The Story of Yorktown, authored by Burke Davis,^[83] mentions only that "all the ranking British and German officers were invited". Tarleton wasn't evacuated before the surrender along with some Legion members who were deemed at risk.