Draft:The Swaddle
Indian Digital Publication and Studio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Swaddle is an independent digital media company[1] based in Mumbai, India, known for offering alternative perspectives on news, culture and current events[2] through its publication, podcasts, social-first video series, and documentary shorts.[3] [4] The Swaddle’s multimedia team has produced work on themes ranging from Mumbai’s last surviving courtesans[5] to the K-pop fandom in India.[6] Its original video series making South Asian academic scholarship accessible in video format[7][8]is still used as a teaching tool in universities around India.[9][10]
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,224 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 10 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Bonadea 2 months ago.
| |
Comment: The tone here is promotional, almost a PR pitch or advertisement. As an encyclopedia entries are neutral summaries of reliable sources, and this is not coming across with this wording. ChrysGalley (talk) 11:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- promotional language: see Words to watch;
- personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
- informal language.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.