Mechademia

US peer-reviewed academic journal From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mechademia: Second Arc is a biannual (formerly annual) peer-reviewed academic journal in English about Japanese popular culture products and fan practices. It is published by the University of Minnesota Press and the editor-in-chief is Frenchy Lunning.[1] Mechademia has also held an annual conference since 2001.[2]

LanguageEnglish
Former names
Mechademia: An Annual Forum for Anime, Manga, and the Fan Arts
Quick facts Subject, Language ...
Mechademia: Second Arc
SubjectAnime and manga studies, Japanese studies, Asian studies, Media studies
LanguageEnglish
Edited byFrenchy Lunning, Sandra Annett
Publication details
Former names
Mechademia: An Annual Forum for Anime, Manga, and the Fan Arts
History2006–present
Publisher
FrequencyBiannually
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Mechademia
Indexing
ISSN1934-2489 (print)
2152-6648 (web)
LCCN2006215646
OCLC no.72523390
Links
Close

Volumes

Since 2006, ten volumes have been published.[3] Each volume is dedicated to a collection of articles themed around a specific topic, such as shojo manga or anime and manga fandom. It is indexed in Project MUSE[4] and JSTOR.[5] After a break of three years, a new series of Mechademia volumes (Second Arc) was launched beginning in 2018, the first being themed around childhood. The scope of Mechademia will be broadened to include all of Asia in its remit.[6][7]

More information No., Title ...
No. Title Release date ISBN
1Mechademia 1: Emerging Worlds of Anime and MangaDecember 22, 2006[8]978-0-8166-4945-7
2Mechademia 2: Networks of DesireDecember 26, 2007[9]978-0-8166-5266-2
3Mechademia 3: Limits of the HumanNovember 5, 2008[10]978-0-8166-5482-6
4Mechademia 4: War/TimeNovember 11, 2009[11]978-0-8166-6749-9
5Mechademia 5: FanthropologiesNovember 9, 2010[12]978-0-8166-7387-2
6Mechademia 6: User EnhancedNovember 3, 2011[13]978-0-8166-7734-4
7Mechademia 7: Lines of SightNovember 7, 2012[14]978-0-8166-8049-8
8Mechademia 8: Tezuka's Manga LifeJanuary 21, 2014[15]978-0-8166-8955-2
9Mechademia 9: OriginsDecember 10, 2014[16]978-0-8166-9535-5
10Mechademia 10: World RenewalNovember 2015[17]978-0-8166-9915-5
11.1ChildhoodFall 2018[18]978-1517906351
12.1Transnational FandomFall 2019[19]978-1517908423
12.2ASIAN MATERIALITIESSpring 2020[20]978-1517908430
13.1QUEER(ING)Spring 2020[21]978-1517911300
13.2SoundscapesSpring 2021[22]978-1517912048
14.1Science FictionFall 2021[23]
14.2NEW FORMULATIONS OF THE OTAKUSpring 2022[24]
15.1MODES OF EXISTENCEFall 2022[25]
15.22.5D CultureSpring 2023[26]
16.1MEDIA MIXWinter 2023[27]
16.2MEDIA INDUSTRIES AND PLATFORMSSummer 2024[28]
17.1COSPLAY, STREET FASHION, AND SUBCULTURAL STYLESWinter 2024[29]
17.2METHODOLOGIESSummer 2025[30]
18.1DEATH AND OTHER ENDINGSWinter 2025[31]
18.2Studio GhibliSummer 2026[32]
19.1"Semiosis/Symbiosis"Winter 2026[33]
19.2Graphic NarrativesSummer 2027[34]
20.1"Gametides"Winter 2027[35]
20.2Erotic Bodies – Hentai, BL, and BeyondSummer 2028[36]
21.1Urban Architectures & Fan SpacesWinter 2029[37]
21.2Isekai: Other WorldsSummer 2029[38]
22.1Race, Class, and Asian Hip HopWinter 2030[39]
22.2IndigeneitySummer 2030[40]
23.1SubjectivitiesWinter 2031[41]
23.2“-Punked”: Imagining ResistanceSummer 2031[42]
Close

Reception

Steve Raiteri from Library Journal commends Mechademia as a "great first effort [...] bridg[ing] the gap between academics and fans."[43] Christophe Thouny, writing for Animation also thought the writing and tone was accessible by both academics and fans.[44] Ed Sizemore from Comics Worth Reading criticizes the journal for its review and commentary section because they "read like summaries of the works (films and books) discussed with no actual critique of the work". However, Sizemore commends the journal's academic essay section.[45]

By contrast, Raiteri in Library Journal states that fans will find the Review and Commentary section "the most accessible" section of the journal.[43] Kevin Gifford contrasts Mechademia with shallower works on anime, praising its "insightful essays and reviews" and detail, calling it "worthwhile reading for anyone hungry for intelligent writing" about anime.[46] Tomo Hirai of the Nichi Bei Times described the first volume as "an informative and inspiring read for those curious beyond the skin of anime".[47]

A review of the second volume of Mechademia by Comics Worth Reading's Johanna Draper Carlson criticises the journal for its dry tone and "flat statements following after each other separated only by footnote numbers".[48] A later review by Ed Sizemore recommends that Mechademia "should stop trying to develop a theme for each issue".[49] Active Anime's Holly Ellingwood comments that the journal's "strong academic bent may put off some potential readers but give it a chance and peruse through the many varied topics".[50] A later review by Scott Campbell commends the third volume of Mechademia as being "extremely insightful and thought provoking ... [about] anime, manga, and even the future of mankind".[51] D. Harlan Wilson found the third volume to be "as accessible as it was provocative and enlightening".[52]

William McClain criticises the fourth volume for having articles that are "too restrictive" in focus, calling attention to the lack of discussion, in this volume, of how anime and manga culture has spread internationally. McClain also criticises the volume for not including enough visual aids for the general reader, but praises the Mechademia journal as a whole for its experimental approach.[53] Ellen Grabiner feels that War/Time takes the approach that war has become a part of everyday life in post-war Japanese society, and praises the broad range of essays.[54] Timothy Iles feels that the strength of Mechademia is that it provides "theoretically informed, historically grounded, jargon-free research that highlights first and foremost, not the self-serving virtuosity of the researcher, but the interpretive depth of the material under analysis."[55]

Abstracting and indexing

According to Ulrichsweb, Mechademia is abstracted and indexed in EBSCOhost, Gale, OCLC, and ProQuest.[56]

Most cited articles

According to Google Scholar, the three most-cited papers in Mechademia are:[57]

References

Further reading

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI