Looting

In armed conflict

Looting by a victorious army during war has been a common practice throughout recorded history.^[7] Foot soldiers viewed plunder as a way to supplement an often-meagre income^[14] and transferred wealth became part of the celebration of victory. In the wake of the Napoleonic Wars and particularly after World War II, norms against wartime plunder became widely accepted.^[7]

In the upper ranks, the proud exhibition of the loot plundered formed an integral part of the typical Roman triumph, and Genghis Khan was not unusual in proclaiming that the greatest happiness was "to vanquish your enemies ... to rob them of their wealth".^[15]

The Greek historian Polybius recounts that in the Roman era there existed a particular regulation concerning war booty after having conquered a city. Depending on the size of the city, the Romans assigned to the collection of booty, in some cases some men taken from each maniple, while at other times entire maniples.^[16] They never, however, employed for this operation more than half of their troops. The others were arranged to control the key points of the city, both internally and externally, always ready to intervene at any moment.^[17]

It should be added that in the republican period, since consular armies were normally composed of two legions and two alae of allied troops, all those who were assigned to this action of plundering normally brought the share of booty they had taken to their own legion.^[18]

The tribunes, once the entire booty had been sold, distributed the profit in equal parts to everyone, including those who had remained at their post performing a covering function, in addition to those placed to guard the camps, the sick, and also those who had been sent somewhere to perform some special duty but belonging to that particular consular army.^[19] All this because no one may appropriate part of the booty without having been authorized by his tribune. All, in fact, must remain faithful to the oath taken at the moment of entering the army, when the recruits are assembled for the first time in the camp, in preparation for their first military campaigns.^[20]

Commanders must therefore concern themselves with nothing other than this problem (how to prevent individuals from appropriating the booty belonging to the entire army); they must ensure that [...] all soldiers have, as far as possible, the opportunity to participate in the booty equally.

It is no coincidence that no one harbored distrust toward their comrades-in-arms; on the contrary everyone knew, both those who remained on cover duty and those who went to plunder the city, that each would be given his share, without anyone ever considering it appropriate to abandon his post in order to recover his portion of the booty, something that would have caused irreparable damage in an army.^[21]

It is said that Julius Caesar, not only did not remove from his soldiers during the Gallic Wars the possibility of taking booty, but to the poor and simple legionary, who had to keep clearly in mind the final objective of the campaign and whose actions were not to condition the operational plans of the commander, in 51–50 BC he doubled the pay from 5 to 10 asses per day (equal to 225 denarii annually), so much so that the pay of the legionary remained unchanged until the period of the emperor Domitian (81–96).^[22]

It is said that the conquest of Dacia brought to the emperor Trajan an enormous booty, estimated at five million Roman pounds of gold (equal to 163.6 t) and double the amount of silver,^[23] and an extraordinary quantity of other loot, in addition to half a million prisoners of war with their weapons. It was the fabulous treasure of Decebalus, which the king himself is said to have hidden in the bed of a small river (the Sargetia) near his capital, Sarmizegetusa Regia.^[23][24] The same emperor was granted a grand triumph, with gladiatorial spectacles, chariot races in the Circus Maximus, a new forum and the construction of the famous column, thirty meters high, on whose spiral frieze, two hundred meters long, the military deeds of Trajan and his generals were carved. A work of rare beauty and originality where, under the guidance of the great architect Apollodorus of Damascus, until the day of the inauguration (which took place on May 12 113), numerous sculptors worked on 155 scenes and 2500 figures.^[25] Some have thought that these astonishing numbers were the result of a transcription error and that the real figure should be divided by ten but, even if that were the case, the result would remain exceptionally remarkable. In fact Trajan seems to have received from this immense booty about 2.7 billion sesterces, a figure clearly higher than the entire sum spent by Augustus and documented in his Res gestae divi Augusti. In addition to this, the conquest contributed to a permanent increase in revenues in the state treasury thanks to the mines of western Dacia which were reopened under the supervision of imperial officials.^[26]

Looting was sometimes prohibited due to religious concerns. For example, King Clovis I of the Franks, forbade his soldiers to loot when they campaigned near St Martin's shrine in Tours, for fear of offending the saint.^[27] In warfare in ancient times, the spoils of war included the defeated populations, which were often enslaved. Women and children might become absorbed into the victorious country's population, as concubines, eunuchs and slaves.^[28][29] In other pre-modern societies, objects made of precious metals were the preferred target of war looting, largely because of their ease of portability. In many cases, looting offered an opportunity to obtain treasures and works of art that otherwise would not have been obtainable. Beginning in the early modern period and reaching its peak in the New Imperialism era, European colonial powers frequently looted areas they captured during military campaigns against non-European states.^[30] In the 1930s, and even more so during the Second World War, Nazi Germany engaged in large-scale and organized looting of art and property, particularly in Nazi-occupied Poland.^[31][32] The Soviet Union did likewise.^[33] On the smaller level, looting was done by other Allied forces too.^[34]

Looting, combined with poor military discipline, has occasionally been an army's downfall^{[citation needed]} since troops who have dispersed to ransack an area may become vulnerable to counter-attack, a good example being during the 1967 First Invasion of Onitsha, where the victorious Nigerian troops were encircled and annihilated while looting. In other cases, for example, the Wahhabi sack of Karbala in 1801 or 1802, loot has contributed to further victories for an army.^[35] Not all looters in wartime are conquerors; the looting of Vistula Land by the retreating Imperial Russian Army in 1915^[36] was among the factors sapping the loyalty of Poles to Russia. Local civilians can also take advantage of a breakdown of order to loot public and private property, as took place at the Iraq Museum in the course of the Iraq War in 2003.^[37] Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy's novel War and Peace describes widespread looting by Moscow's citizens before Napoleon's troops entered the city in 1812, along with looting by French troops elsewhere.

In 1990 and 1991, during the Gulf War, Saddam Hussein's soldiers caused significant damage to both Kuwaiti and Saudi infrastructure. They also stole from private companies and homes.^[38][39] In April 2003, looters broke into the National Museum of Iraq, and thousands of artefacts remain missing.^[40][41]

Syrian conservation sites and museums were looted during the Syrian Civil War, with items being sold on the international black market.^[42][43] Reports from 2012 suggested that the antiquities were being traded for weapons by the various combatants.^[44][45]

Modern conflicts

Despite international prohibitions against the practice of looting, the ease with which it can be done means that it remains relatively common, particularly during outbreaks of civil unrest during which rules of war may not yet apply. The 2011 Egyptian Revolution, for example, caused a significant increase in the looting of antiquities from archaeological sites in Egypt, as the government lost the ability to protect the sites.^[49] Other acts of modern looting, such as the looting and destruction of artifacts from the National Museum of Iraq by Islamic State militants, can be used as an easy way to express contempt for the concept of rules of war altogether.^[50]

In the case of a sudden change in a country or region's government, it can be difficult to determine what constitutes looting as opposed to a new government taking custody of the property in question. This can be especially difficult if the new government is only partially recognized at the time the property is moved, as was the case during the 2021 Taliban offensive, during which a number of artifacts and a large amount of property of former government officials who had fled the country fell into the hands of the Taliban before they were recognized as the legitimate government of Afghanistan by other countries. Further looting and burning of civilian homes and villages has been defended by the Taliban as within their right as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.^[51]

Looting can also be common in cases where civil unrest is contained largely within the borders of a country or during peacetime. Riots in the wake of the 2020 George Floyd protests in numerous American cities led to increased amounts of looting, as looters took advantage of the delicate political situation and civil unrest surrounding the riots themselves.^[52][53][54] Up to 175 Target stores closed Nationwide during the disturbances.^[55][56]

During the ongoing Kashmir conflict, looting of Kashmiris trapped between the Indian and Pakistani militarized zones is common and widespread.^[57]

In 2022, international observers accused Russia of engaging in large scale looting during the Russo-Ukrainian War, reporting the widespread looting of everything from food to industrial equipment.^[58] Despite the publication of numerous photos and videos by Ukrainian journalists and civilians, numerous Russian commanders have denied these claims. International observers have theorized that this looting is either the result of direct orders, despite to Russia's claims to the contrary, or due to Russian soldiers not being issued with adequate food and other resources by their commanders.^[59] On 18 November 2022, the University of Miami estimated that Russian forces in Ukraine had destroyed, pillaged, and looted at least 40 museums in Ukraine.^[60]