Talk:America Windows/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 07:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Tokeamour (talk · contribs) 23:02, 27 August 2025 (UTC)


Highlighted portions are by the reviewer.

1a. Prose Prose by definition literally means "straightforward" which this article is especially in the lead, though is seen through the entire article, pass.

1b. MoS MoS is a pass, under my own check utilizing GA criteria, and the article: Wikipedia:Manual of Style

2a. Citations WP:RS I will be assessing a total of three citations and then contributors relevant layout.

  • [14] Is sufficient "...Chagall himself painted his design onto the glass using metallic oxide paints..." -supports claim in Process section in the article (P1 S7)
  • [2] Contributors claim in Background section (P1 S2-S3) is backed by evidence “...Rembrandt’s primary color was brown, Chagall’s was most definitely blue...” reference makes this not a claim but a fact.
  • [1] Claim backed by evidence,"Best known as a painter, Chagall had been working in stained glass f..." in Background section (P1 S1)

2b. Ref layout: Contributor('s) have followed the rule of thumb of if there is the want or a substantial need waranting multiple new sections regarding references that the sections can be deemed "Notes", "Endnotes" or "Footnotes", as stated in the MoS and deemed the Notes section was used, and has been implemented correctly by all respective parties responsible for that section this is a... PASS.

2c. No WP:OR Pass, as relevant contributors (or contributor) has substantial references for all claims assessed in review meaning it does not contain any original research.

2d. No WP:CV Due to the recent review for DYK there was no findings of copy violations, I will only confirm this, update, this is all good as it seems to be fair use and public domain, as the DYK Reviewer said photos are not clickable so they are not going to be assessed, pass.

4. Neutral, 3a. Broad, 5. Stable, 3b. Focused. Covers a wide audience? Yes Educational? Yes Covers topic responsibly? Yes PASS Area Assessed? Body and Photographs

6a,6b Already assessed, subject to pass due to 2nd assessment having warranted same results as first.


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI