Talk:Autoerotic fatality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge?

I'm thinking this sould be merged with he AEA article. --70.48.219.198 07:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree Naysie 10:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

No, I disagree. There is plenty of information in Hazelwood to merit a separate entry. While AEA is a practice, autoerotic fatalities have psychological, forensic, legal, etc. contexts. Here are the chapter titles, to demonstrate:

  1. Autoeroticism and the Public Visibility of Autoerotic Asphyxia
  2. Recurrent Discovery of Autoerotic Asphyxia
  3. Study Design and Sample Characteristics
  4. Asphyxial Autoerotic Fatalities
  5. Autoerotic Asphyxia, the Paraphilias, and Mental Disorder
  6. Atypical Autoerotic Fatalities
  7. Investigation of Autoerotic Fatalities
  8. Equivocal Deaths: Accident, Suicide, or Homicide?
  9. Judicial Decisions Regarding Insurance Benefits in Autoerotic Fatalities

The book is also more than a thorough literature review; Hazelwood is an FBI agent, and the book also includes a study of 157 sample cases submitted to the FBI Behavioral Science Unit at the FBI Academy. All in all, I think this entry and the entry on AEA need to have coordinated changes, since they are closely related, albeit different topics. Timocrates 17:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Hanging wankers

Amzed how fast and petty the removal of the reference to Hanging Wankers was: this was a foolish edit. This is a well know phrase used by UK police and coroners and seems entirely appropriate and useful.

Picture

Is the drawing of a man hanging by his own genetalia remotely appropriate for wikipedia? Reyemile (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is NOT censored, this is not even a photography. I think this picture is far from being offensive and there is much much worse content on various wikipedia's articles, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fellatio-auto.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Autofellatio3.jpg (no need to warn you that clicking on these links will direct you to visual materials of a very sexually-explicit nature, beware...) try the talk page also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Autofellatio 13:20, 8 June 2009 (GMT)
Not surprised by being uncensored--rather, I'm commenting on the fact that it adds nothing to the article. It's a political cartoon, not an illustration of any content; it's unreferenced by the article, and anatomically impossible. Obscenity of the picture notwithstanding, I'm looking for a justification for its inclusion in an encyclopedia Reyemile (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Is it justified to have a picture of the subject matter; it is relevant and improves the article by illustrating it. What makes you claim it is anatomically impossible for a man to hang himself by his neck and genitals? It does happen. Correct & improve (talk) 03:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
He's hanging himself WITH his genitals, not from them--his four foot penis is wrapped around his own neck. An anatomically impossible cartoon. I'm giving it a week, and if no one has justified the picture's existence, I'm deleting it.Reyemile (talk) 04:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I was going to comment on missing what was sure to be a Best Of... moment, then I remembered Wikipedia's handy History function and discovered that the image itself is still intact. Perhaps it'd be good for... a... caricature or... something? *stifles laughter* Hey, you in the back, pipe down! This is serious business! XD Orethrius (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The death of Gareth Williams

Could the death of Gareth Williams potentially be an autoerotic death, he was found naked in a bag locked from the outside, and the police say it’s not foul play. 75.139.2.180 (talk) 03:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Disputed: The inclusion of David Carradine in this article is unsupported by the sources.

Citations needed for the famous cases section

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI