Talk:Autoerotic fatality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge?
I'm thinking this sould be merged with he AEA article. --70.48.219.198 07:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree Naysie 10:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
No, I disagree. There is plenty of information in Hazelwood to merit a separate entry. While AEA is a practice, autoerotic fatalities have psychological, forensic, legal, etc. contexts. Here are the chapter titles, to demonstrate:
- Autoeroticism and the Public Visibility of Autoerotic Asphyxia
- Recurrent Discovery of Autoerotic Asphyxia
- Study Design and Sample Characteristics
- Asphyxial Autoerotic Fatalities
- Autoerotic Asphyxia, the Paraphilias, and Mental Disorder
- Atypical Autoerotic Fatalities
- Investigation of Autoerotic Fatalities
- Equivocal Deaths: Accident, Suicide, or Homicide?
- Judicial Decisions Regarding Insurance Benefits in Autoerotic Fatalities
The book is also more than a thorough literature review; Hazelwood is an FBI agent, and the book also includes a study of 157 sample cases submitted to the FBI Behavioral Science Unit at the FBI Academy. All in all, I think this entry and the entry on AEA need to have coordinated changes, since they are closely related, albeit different topics. Timocrates 17:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Hanging wankers
Amzed how fast and petty the removal of the reference to Hanging Wankers was: this was a foolish edit. This is a well know phrase used by UK police and coroners and seems entirely appropriate and useful.
Picture
Is the drawing of a man hanging by his own genetalia remotely appropriate for wikipedia? Reyemile (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is NOT censored, this is not even a photography. I think this picture is far from being offensive and there is much much worse content on various wikipedia's articles, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fellatio-auto.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Autofellatio3.jpg (no need to warn you that clicking on these links will direct you to visual materials of a very sexually-explicit nature, beware...) try the talk page also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Autofellatio 13:20, 8 June 2009 (GMT)
- Not surprised by being uncensored--rather, I'm commenting on the fact that it adds nothing to the article. It's a political cartoon, not an illustration of any content; it's unreferenced by the article, and anatomically impossible. Obscenity of the picture notwithstanding, I'm looking for a justification for its inclusion in an encyclopedia Reyemile (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Is it justified to have a picture of the subject matter; it is relevant and improves the article by illustrating it. What makes you claim it is anatomically impossible for a man to hang himself by his neck and genitals? It does happen. Correct & improve (talk) 03:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I was going to comment on missing what was sure to be a Best Of... moment, then I remembered Wikipedia's handy History function and discovered that the image itself is still intact. Perhaps it'd be good for... a... caricature or... something? *stifles laughter* Hey, you in the back, pipe down! This is serious business! XD Orethrius (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
The death of Gareth Williams
Could the death of Gareth Williams potentially be an autoerotic death, he was found naked in a bag locked from the outside, and the police say it’s not foul play. 75.139.2.180 (talk) 03:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)