Talk:D4vd/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: EternalBaile (talk · contribs) 20:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Veko (talk · contribs) 15:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Note: I'm going on a partial Wikibreak, however I'll still be editing. Sorry for the prolonged wait for finishing this review (I've been a bit busy), but during my Wikibreak this will be my number one priority on finishing. I expect to finish this soon. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 12:35, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Assessment notice This assessment is based on this revision

Spot check

10% of citations or 10 citations (whichever is higher) were spot checked at random:

More information #, Citation Number ...

Caption text

#	Citation Number	R.	Reviewer Comments
1	59		N/A
2	44		N/A
3	43		N/A
4	54		N/A
5	35		N/A
6	29		N/A
7	41		N/A
8	5		N/A
9	56		N/A
10	16		N/A

Close

Final verdict

More information Rate, Attribute ...

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Close

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.