Talk:Employee Stock Ownership Plan

There should be a section on corporate governance under various forms of ESOPs. The main question is where control of such entities lies, as many don't allow participating employees any role in governing the companies they "own". Scyg (talk) 11:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

There is a discussion at Talk:Employee stock ownership plans in the United States § Relationship to ESOP and Employee stock ownership about the relation of this article to that one. Daask (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

It has been proposed in this section that Employee Stock Ownership Plan be renamed and moved to Employee stock ownership planEmployee stock ownership plan. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

Employee Stock Ownership Plan → Employee stock ownership planEmployee stock ownership plan – This article is about a type of plan, not a specific named plan. That makes it a common noun, not a proper noun. Like Employee stock purchase plan, Defined contribution plan, Defined benefit pension plan, Cash balance plan, Incentive stock option, and Individual retirement account, the title should use WP:SENTENCECASE. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

• Support, per nom. BD2412 T 00:21, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Even some specific plans are lc if that’s what sources do. Wallnot (talk) 02:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Support per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:54, 12 April 2026 (UTC)