Talk:F1 24

@CanonNi To improve the Wikipedia page for "F1 24" from a Start-class to a C-class assessment, you can expand and enhance various sections with additional details, references, and structure. Here are some suggestions:

1. Gameplay Section: Enhance the gameplay section by detailing more aspects of the game mechanics, modes, and features. Include information about:

Detailed descriptions of game modes (e.g., Career mode, F1 World, Multiplayer modes).

Specific gameplay mechanics (e.g., weather effects, car customization).

Comparisons to previous entries in the series.

Screenshots or diagrams, if possible, to illustrate gameplay features.

2. Development and Release: Provide more information on the development process, including:

The development timeline.

Key people involved in the development.

Technological advancements or changes from previous games.

Marketing strategies and promotional events.

Details about the game's reception at launch events or showcases.

3. Reception: Expand the reception section with more detailed analysis of both critical and player reviews:

Summarize reviews from a broader range of critics.

Include specific points of praise and criticism.

Mention any awards or nominations the game received.

Highlight user reviews from various platforms (e.g., Steam, Metacritic user scores).

4. Additional Sections: Consider adding new sections to cover more aspects of the game:

Soundtrack: Detail the music and sound design, mentioning the composer and specific tracks or themes.

Technical Aspects: Discuss the game's performance on different platforms, including graphical fidelity, frame rates, and any known technical issues or patches.

Community and Modding: Describe the game's community, any significant mods, and developer support for user-generated content.

Esports and Competitive Play: If applicable, mention any esports events, tournaments, or competitive play features related to the game.

5. References: Enhance the reference by adding more citations from reliable sources, such as:

Interviews with developers.

Articles from reputable gaming websites.

Official announcements from Codemasters and EA Sports.

Detailed reviews and analysis from gaming journalists.

By expanding and detailing these sections, you can provide a more comprehensive and informative article that meets the criteria for a C-class assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

@Ktkvtsh got it, thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

@Ktkvtsh I've done some expansion. Would you mind doing another reassessment? Thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 15:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

It looks great. I’m upgrading the assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Wow... that was quick. Thanks! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 15:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

My pleasure Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Nominator: CanonNi (talk · contribs) 00:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:F1 24/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 10:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Will read through soon. Jaguar (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! [​[User:CanonNi]​] (💬 • ✍️) 10:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Lead

• "EA Sports F1 24, also called EA F1 24 or F1 24, is a racing video game" - this would be better on in brackets rather than commas
• "The game was released on 31 May, or three days earlier for users who pre-ordered the Champions' Edition" - 31 May 2024 worldwide? What about the other regions? Please specify
• The lead is far too short as it stands, and currently does not summarise the article. Development is missing and the reception should be typically at the bottom of the second paragraph, rather than at the end of the first

Body

• No gameplay screenshot?
• "The story mode returned in F1 25." - unsourced
• "players drive cars using game controllers or steering wheels." - specify open wheel racing cars
• "F1 24 introduced a new career mode" - should not be in past tense
• "in which players play as real drivers" - in which players play as real professional Formula One drivers
• I feel the gameplay section is too short and does not adequately summarise all of the gameplay mechanics, can you expand it?
• "An announcement trailer was released on 27 February" - what year?
• I am concerned with the comprehensiveness of the reception section. It must be expanded to meet the GA criteria - there are reviews in the reception box which aren't included in the prose!

At the moment, the article does not meet the GA criteria. A lack of comprehensiveness is its main issue, along with a few minor prose issues which can be rectified. The reception section must be expanded to reflect all the reviewers' comments; at the moment, only the Guardian, IGN, and PC Gamer are in the prose, and inadequate summaries at that. I will leave this review on hold for you so that you can facilitate an article expansion. The article is too short and devoid of content to meet the criteria, but I believe changes can be made. Let me know if you have any questions. I would recommend comparing the reception section to those of other video game GAs. Jaguar (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the initial review. I'll be working on the article over the next few days, and will drop you a ping when I think it's ready. [​[User:CanonNi]​] (💬 • ✍️) 12:50, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Any update, CanonNi? Jaguar (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

No response -- I'm afraid I will close the GAN. Jaguar (talk) 12:48, 2 August 2025 (UTC)