Talk:First Crusade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Former featured articleFirst Crusade is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleFirst Crusade has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 18, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 4, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
December 27, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
January 8, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
August 26, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
July 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed
August 15, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
November 14, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
Close
More information Associated task forces:, Additional information: ...
Close

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2024

Add the following during the section on the Siege of Antioch: Firouz, a pivotal figure during the Siege of Antioch, was a Christian who had converted to Islam and held a key position in the city as a tower commander. Discontented with his treatment under the Muslim leaders and motivated by personal grievances, Firouz secretly negotiated with Bohemond. His betrayal allowed the Crusaders to infiltrate the city by guiding them through the city's defenses in the middle of the night. Firouz’s actions directly facilitated the fall of Antioch to the Crusaders, marking a decisive moment on the Crusader's path to Jerusalem Scamilosteez (talk) 02:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Persecution of Christians

i don't think this part of the page is neutral enough, and more then that "even bishops are defiled with the sin of sodomy and it is now trumpeted abroad that one bishop has succumbed to this abominable sin." i thaught muslims were strict toward sodomy ? i wish if anybody have the ability to give more better express about this part of the page  Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.172.212.73 (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Error in map titled "The Byzantine Empire (867–1081)"

The labels for the borders at 1025 and 1081 are reversed based on the source provided for the map titled "The Byzantine Empire (867–1081)". Please fix, whoever made the map. "https://archive.org/details/byzantineempire0000brow/page/94/mode/2up" ~2025-43025-12 (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2026

Delete "The historiography (history of the histories) of the First Crusade and the Crusades in general, as expected, show works that reflect the views of the authors and the times that they lived in."

This is a truism and is assumed in all historical writing. IchabodAdTempus (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Removed this pointless sentence. Day Creature (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI