Talk:Ghost Security
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ghost Security Group vs. GhostSec
User:Ghost Security BOC was clearly promoting his organization, but they do have one valid point: Ghost Security Group is no longer GhostSec. I'm not quite sure about reliability, but this source gives a rather detailed overview of the two organizations. The International Business Times confirms they are distinct. I'm not quite sure which of them this article should be about; likely the Anonymous-affiliated one, not Ghost Security Group (which should be mentioned as an offshoot). Thoughts? Huon (talk) 23:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Huon, I'm coming here from VRTS ticket # 2017090610025969, but it's hard to say which group it's discussing. Everything before Special:Diff/727650775 talks about the combined group, and barring some formatting changes nothing has changed since then. I would make the argument that while there was some clear promotional/COI editing, the only major edits to the page (and likely, the only direction notability would go) would be to have the page renamed to Ghost Security Group. Thoughts? Primefac (talk) 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC) re-ping because I'm an idiot. Primefac (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
why is modern day ghostsec and their details not mentioned here, and how about the clear line that GhostSecGroup is not GhostSec — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.236.193.233 (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Modern day ghostsec doesn't exist. The ones who call themselves GhostSec on twitter have nothing to do with this group. CtrlSec and WauchulaGhost (ex member of GhostSec) denined having any connection with the new group. According to WauchulaGhost, ghostsec disbanded in 2016 and GhostSecGroup is only functioning. RandomPotato123 (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)




