Talk:Hargeisa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hargeisa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
very biased presentation of the city of Hargisa
Hargesa 1960-1980
I have a problem with the brief description of Hargiesa's history in this page. It jumps over and skips a lot of important events with a very few details and a misleading tone. So from 196o to 1980 all what is there to talk about is a museum? Furthermore, what about the period from 1980 to 1991 (the time that witnessed an extensive and systematic human rights violations on a large scale against the population of Hargiesa and much of the central-eastern present day Somaliland)I suggest we expand this section into 3 parts:
A) From 1960 - 1969 (from the union to the coup)
B) From 1969 - 1980 (from the coup until the beginning of human rights violations)
C From 1980 - 1991 (from HRV ending till the beginning of the Somali civil war)
We can add more sections later, however, I believe these 3 different eras that shaped Hargiesa's history should not be trivialized by a museum that was destroyed later during the civil war. Or the "Numerous new development projects that were subsequently launched in the city " when in fact, it was prohibited by law to build over 2 store building in the north(present day Somaliland) One of the many unfair government practices discriminating against the majority Isaaq clan n the region which it's not highlighted anywhere here. Warabe-94 (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Edit war
@Somajeeste: you have violated Wikipedia's WP:3RR rule. Please self-revert your most recent edit or you risk getting your account blocked. What you are doing is disruptive editing. The situation between Somaliland and Somalia is well known, and Somaliland's status has been discussed extensively. The section has suffered persistent vandalism for quite some time now which is why many of the pages were placed under protection. This is not a new discussion Talk:Hargeisa#Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2015. Please cease the disruptive editing and self-revert your most recent edit. You can then discuss the issue in the talkpage. Kzl55 (talk) 15:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Per WP:BRD, please discuss your edits here for consensus User:Kzl55. You have removed content which have reference from CIA Factbook. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Somajeeste (talk • contribs) 15:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Are you kidding ?? you are the one removing useful content and i revert it , don't remove discuss it here, what is your concern? Hargeisa was mentioned as " Northwestern Somalia" on its reference do you have concerns about the legitimate of reference is CIA factbook, go and check for your self and hey making threats against me mean absolutely nothing Somajeeste (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Only reason for removal of that source was because it will lead to further disturbance and edit warring as is happening right now. The BBC country profile does both highlight the geopolitical reality on the ground that is Somaliland's de facto status and acknowledge that Somaliland is not internationally recognised, as such it serves the intended purpose of citation and is more appropriate for inclusion. Please cease the disruptive editing, this section has suffered a fair deal of vandalism and disruptive editing mainly from the Somalia side. There are so many pages that need work, instead of editwarring on Somaliland articles out of some misplaced sense of nationalism your efforts are better suited to populating the section. Kzl55 (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have reverted your re-addition of the twisted, non-neutral material to this article. and I have no intention of allowing material which twists the facts to be readded to these articles. Do this three times and you will be reported to AN/I (or blocked, as the template warns). Somajeeste (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Only reason for removal of that source was because it will lead to further disturbance and edit warring as is happening right now. The BBC country profile does both highlight the geopolitical reality on the ground that is Somaliland's de facto status and acknowledge that Somaliland is not internationally recognised, as such it serves the intended purpose of citation and is more appropriate for inclusion. Please cease the disruptive editing, this section has suffered a fair deal of vandalism and disruptive editing mainly from the Somalia side. There are so many pages that need work, instead of editwarring on Somaliland articles out of some misplaced sense of nationalism your efforts are better suited to populating the section. Kzl55 (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Are you kidding ?? you are the one removing useful content and i revert it , don't remove discuss it here, what is your concern? Hargeisa was mentioned as " Northwestern Somalia" on its reference do you have concerns about the legitimate of reference is CIA factbook, go and check for your self and hey making threats against me mean absolutely nothing Somajeeste (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BURDEN specifically says that the editor who reinserts text takes responsibility for that text. Now, most of it is uncontentious, though very vaguely connected, and for now, I've readded it. I'd invited you to explain at the talk page but you don't have anything other than BBC,, CIA FACTBOOK was there no need to change the facts, your intentions (removing text with reference) represent non-neutral point of view.Somajeeste (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- You are in violation of Wikipedia rules, for the last time, I advice you to do a self-revert or you risk your account getting blocked.
- I have explained the reason behind my edit and the inclusion of a legitimate source that present both the fact the Somaliland is indeed a de facto state and that it is not internationally recognised. Reference to Hargeisa as a city in northwestern Somalia is not appropriate due to the de facto status of Somaliland. Just like the reference of Taipei as a city in the southwest of the PRC is not appropriate or reflective of the reality on the ground. But you know all of this. Kzl55 (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please cease the disruptive editing. As said previously, referring to Hargeisa as a city in northwestern Somalia is not appropriate due to the de facto status of Somaliland. I've updated the language to indicate the de facto status of Somaliland, that should be enough to settle the matter. Kzl55 (talk) 08:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BURDEN specifically says that the editor who reinserts text takes responsibility for that text. Now, most of it is uncontentious, though very vaguely connected, and for now, I've readded it. I'd invited you to explain at the talk page but you don't have anything other than BBC,, CIA FACTBOOK was there no need to change the facts, your intentions (removing text with reference) represent non-neutral point of view.Somajeeste (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I consider the information on the CIA fact book very important, But "Horn of africa" is a non-NPOV that shouldn't generally be used in Wikipedia's Hargeisa page this is city is Northwestern Somalia. And the cited sources make an obvious point, The repeated removal is disruptive and not NPOV. Somajeeste (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- I have repeated the same point multiple times now, referring to Hargeisa as a city in northwestern Somalia is not appropriate due to the geopolitical fact that is the de facto status of Somaliland. Other de facto states like ROC (Taiwan) would object to referring to Taipei as 'a city in the southwest of the People's Republic of China'. Please see Taipei for precedent. Somalia has no control or influence over that territory, it has not had any connection with Hargeisa for 26 years. Please cease the disruptive editing.Kzl55 (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- I consider the information on the CIA fact book very important, But "Horn of africa" is a non-NPOV that shouldn't generally be used in Wikipedia's Hargeisa page this is city is Northwestern Somalia. And the cited sources make an obvious point, The repeated removal is disruptive and not NPOV. Somajeeste (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 May 2017
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please revert it the way it was change from Horn of africa to Northwestern Somalia
this guy is famous for WP:PROMOTION and WP:POV his intention of allowing material which twists the facts . this is un acceptable to edit without discussing consensus, it important as CIA fact book referenced to to mention northwestern somalia. }} Somajeeste (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- False. I have just returned the page to its pre edit-war state. It is you who refuses to engage in discussion on this very pageTalk:Hargeisa#Edit war. You continue to editwar despite previous warnings User talk:Somajeeste#3RR warning, an admin already told you that ordinarily you would have been blocked for your behaviour and violation of 3RR. Please cease the disruptive editing. You clearly have a biased editing history against Somaliland . I have asked you to explain those edits and you refuse to do so. Your best bet is to engage in the talkpage before you make edits. You are still editwarring on Adal Sultanate without presenting any proof Adal extended beyond Somaliland Talk:Adal Sultanate#Somalia despite multiple requests to do so. What you are doing is disruptive editing. The project has suffered so much vandalism and disruptive editing in the past, please stop. Kzl55 (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please come back to the discussion above in the talkpage before making requests for edits. A consensus should be established before any edits are made. Kzl55 (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Proposed question for a WP:Request for comment
Should Hargeisa be described as being (a) in Somalia, (b) in Somaliland, (c) in the Horn of Africa, or (d) in some other way? EdJohnston (talk) 21:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- From NPOV Hargeisa should be described as in Somalia, though it of course is legally an autonomous region of Somalia, Especially considering the fact that the whole world considered it nothing other than Somalia. so being described in Somalia does offer greater recognition for those who are not Somalia experts. and then we can add capital city of breakaway region of Somalia that declared independence in 1991,Somajeeste (talk) 02:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Are you disputing that Somaliland is a de facto sovereign state? And that it has had no link to Somalia for 26 years?
- You are wrong to claim the world considers Somaliland nothing other than Somalia. Recently, Somaliland has signed a bilateral deal with the UAE (country to country) allowing the UAE to build a military base in Somaliland. This happened to the objections of the Somalia government and its president, objections that were totally ignored by both Somaliland and the UAE. The president of Somalia, feeling powerless, even went on a trip to Saudi Arabia to request Saudi intervention in the matter . This clearly demonstrates other sovereign states dealing with Somaliland as a sovereign state, and also Somalia lack of jurisdiction over Somaliland. Have a look at the page again, it clearly states both that Hargeisa is a city in the Woqooyi Galbeed region of the self-declared but internationally unrecognised Republic of Somaliland. It presents both Somaliland's de facto self-declared status, AND that it is internationally unrecognised.Kzl55 (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Population is wrong
Consistent websites and consensuses on the population of Somalia has stated the population of Hargeisa being in the 6 - 500,000 region, this is a huge discrepancy between the population that is identified in the article. In fact in the article itself states "Hargeisa has estimated population of around 760,000 as of 2015", its 2017 now so how can the population jump from 760,000 in 2015 to 1.5 Million in 2017?
There are a lot of reliable websites out there on population censuses on Hargeisa that have not been referenced
Evidence of Hargeisa's Population:
"477,876" according to this census in 2017
"477 000 people" according to this website
"477,876" exactly the same according to this website
"477,876" and exactly the same here as well
""477,876" same figure yet again.
Please fix the population of Hargeisa, it is not 1.5Million its far from it as outlined above Bytro4k (talk) 17:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 June 2017
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please copy the elevation (1334 m) of the town from the text in the introduction to the Infobox elevation_m field This is for clarity and consistency for readers wanting the basis stats of the town. MWchat (talk) 16:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)