Talk:Humana
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Humana article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
This article needs special cleanup
WikiProject Louisville |
Cleanup Requested by WikiProject Louisville | |
| WikiProject Louisville has identified Humana as having an unusually high number of issues, and we could very much use editors' assistance in addressing them. These issues are normally noted by the presence of various cleanup banners and in-line templates as well as the page's placement in hidden categories such as "Articles with unsourced statements...". To see these categories, make sure Show hidden categories is checked in your Preferences. Thank you for your help! |
Stefen 𝕋ower's got the power!!1! Gab • Gruntwerk 02:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
2013 promotional content tag
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Hello! I'm E, a representative for Humana. I saw that this article had a promotional tag on it that is over a decade old. Specifically, it mentions "removing promotional language and inappropriate external links"
I looked into the history and the tag seems to be pertaining to an old "Humana's Prescription Home Delivery" section with a link to the service both in the reference and in the External links section. You can see it here
That section and link have since been removed and editors will see the page overall has been substantially changed since the tag was added in 2013. Would an editor remove this tag? Because of my conflict of interest, I will not make direct changes to the article. Thanks! E Humana (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm unclear why the tag was added. There's no edit summary nor corresponding talk page discussion.
- Skimming the current references, it appears the article is heavily dependent upon press releases and similarly poor and promotional sources. Given this, the template still seems to fit, specifically,
adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view.
--Hipal (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)- The Promotional tag has to do with marketing-style or showboating language in the article, not the use of suboptimal sources. I have scanned the article for such and found nothing that is a particular problem that would require this tag, and have removed the tag. If anyone wants to add better citations, have at it. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 18:20, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- My understanding of the general consensus around the use of the tag is not consistent with your interpretation. I've added a third-party tag after skimming over the first 15 refs and finding many problems. --Hipal (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- My understanding of the general consensus is what I stated, having been a Wikipedian for nearly 22 years. The third-party tag is a reasonable tag. Just because citations are insufficient doesn't mean "promotion" is happening to the degree where we would have a concern that demands a Promotional tag. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 20:05, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- My understanding of the general consensus around the use of the tag is not consistent with your interpretation. I've added a third-party tag after skimming over the first 15 refs and finding many problems. --Hipal (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- The Promotional tag has to do with marketing-style or showboating language in the article, not the use of suboptimal sources. I have scanned the article for such and found nothing that is a particular problem that would require this tag, and have removed the tag. If anyone wants to add better citations, have at it. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 18:20, 18 February 2026 (UTC)


