Talk:Humana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information WikiProject Companies To-do: ...
Close


This article needs special cleanup


WikiProject Louisville
Cleanup Requested by WikiProject Louisville
WikiProject Louisville has identified Humana as having an unusually high number of issues, and we could very much use editors' assistance in addressing them. These issues are normally noted by the presence of various cleanup banners and in-line templates as well as the page's placement in hidden categories such as "Articles with unsourced statements...". To see these categories, make sure Show hidden categories is checked in your Preferences. Thank you for your help!

Stefen 𝕋ower's got the power!!1! GabGruntwerk 02:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

2013 promotional content tag

Hello! I'm E, a representative for Humana. I saw that this article had a promotional tag on it that is over a decade old. Specifically, it mentions "removing promotional language and inappropriate external links"

I looked into the history and the tag seems to be pertaining to an old "Humana's Prescription Home Delivery" section with a link to the service both in the reference and in the External links section. You can see it here

That section and link have since been removed and editors will see the page overall has been substantially changed since the tag was added in 2013. Would an editor remove this tag? Because of my conflict of interest, I will not make direct changes to the article. Thanks! E Humana (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm unclear why the tag was added. There's no edit summary nor corresponding talk page discussion.
Skimming the current references, it appears the article is heavily dependent upon press releases and similarly poor and promotional sources. Given this, the template still seems to fit, specifically, adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. --Hipal (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
The Promotional tag has to do with marketing-style or showboating language in the article, not the use of suboptimal sources. I have scanned the article for such and found nothing that is a particular problem that would require this tag, and have removed the tag. If anyone wants to add better citations, have at it. Stefen 𝕋ower HuddleHandiwerk 18:20, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
My understanding of the general consensus around the use of the tag is not consistent with your interpretation. I've added a third-party tag after skimming over the first 15 refs and finding many problems. --Hipal (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
My understanding of the general consensus is what I stated, having been a Wikipedian for nearly 22 years. The third-party tag is a reasonable tag. Just because citations are insufficient doesn't mean "promotion" is happening to the degree where we would have a concern that demands a Promotional tag. Stefen 𝕋ower HuddleHandiwerk 20:05, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
I'm glad we agree on the way forward. --Hipal (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Edit request Oct 21

Filtered request

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI