Talk:Islamophobia

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aashima99 (article contribs).

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

~2025-41633-36 (talk) 05:13, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

The report actually says, "Some policymakers and monitors prefer the label “anti-Muslim hatred”....For the purposes of the present report, the Special Rapporteur uses the term “Islamophobia”. Note "some" not "many" and the authors' use the term "Islamophobia.

Note also that the report says, "It would often be incorrect to address discrimination, hostility and violence that emanate from Islamophobia as based on the single protected ground of religion alone." "[It] unpacks the concept of Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred, including the processes of essentialization and racialization that propel this form of bias."

When you read about what a report says, especially when it's on a blog or opinion piece, it's helpful to read what the report says and see if it has been accurately reported. TFD (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

The UN Warning: Protecting People vs. Protecting Ideas The most powerful evidence against using "Islamophobia" as a conversation-stopper comes from the United Nations. In official report A/HRC/46/30, UN experts acknowledge that many policymakers prefer the term "anti-Muslim hatred" specifically because they fear the word "Islamophobia" is used to "stifle freedom of expression" and "condemn all critiques of Islam." The UN makes a vital distinction that is often ignored by big tech algorithms: International human rights law protects individuals (the people), not religions (the ideas). When a label is used to stop someone from questioning a "biting" verse or an instruction of dominance, it is protecting an ideology at the expense of human inquiry. I want the whole thing removed because it keeps on emphasising it’s about race that word is just simply there to shut down people and a referenced that you win as well.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove the left wing editor for fuck sake and hire a goddamn apolitical guy as a moderator or atleast try to hire a centrist who isn't biased on one side. ~2026-94461-6 (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Reddit believes Angkhana Neelaphaijit support Islam rapist in UK. https://www.reddit.com/r/Thailand/s/tzFkLTreED ~2026-12688-30 (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

And your point being? The beliefs of Reddit participants are not exactly newsworthy. Dimadick (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)