Talk:Israeli settlement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israeli settlement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
False claim about Israel Supreme Court
The article contains an inaccurate statement: "The Supreme Court of Israel, with a variety of different justices sitting, has repeatedly stated that Israel's presence in the West Bank is in violation of international law." This is false and misquotes the cited Haaretz article. The Israeli High Court of Justice has ruled that constructing settlements on privately owned land is illegal, not that Israel's presence in the West Bank violates international law. Lucasdmca (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing this. Actually the High Court has been one of the principal enablers of the occupation. In this instance, the source only says that the court holds that the occupation is subject to international law, not that it violates international law. The detail, not in the source, is that the court has repeatedly based its rulings on the international law of Belligerent Occupation. I applied a minimal fix. Zerotalk 01:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 3 January 2026
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: using correct accents
Diff:
| − | + | Dáil
CHANGED_WIKITEXT |
Mind the gap 1 (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
