Talk:Jainism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleJainism has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 17, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
December 9, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 13, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 11, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 22, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
May 7, 2013Good article nomineeListed
June 10, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
July 30, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
June 14, 2015Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 31, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
March 7, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
July 3, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
March 16, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
April 30, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
December 15, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
April 2, 2019Peer reviewReviewed
May 5, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 6, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the ancient Indian religion Jainism (primary symbol pictured) holds that the universe was not created?
Current status: Good article
Close
More information Associated task forces:, Previous copyedits: ...
Close

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 January 2026

Add hyperlink to the Śvētāmbara article, where the sect is mentioned in the last paragraph of lead. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Day Creature (talk) 20:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Undue weight

The History section basically gives credence to the Jaina's own dogma that their religion is eternal or at least more ancient than basically anything else. This is clearly a marginal view limited to adherents of the religion in question. (In fact, all religions claim the same thing about themselves - Buddhism, Islam, etc. - but this isn't normally presented as true in an encyclopedia.) The sources cited for this are mostly Jains themselves and hence clearly not representative of a mainstream perspective. ~2025-43840-74 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

'A historical being'

'The 23rd Tirthankara, Parshvanatha, was likely a historical being'

The use of the word 'being' hints that he wasn't even human. I don't know whether this is the Jain position, but it is certainly not an NPOV position. It should be 'a historical person' or something like that. ~2025-43840-74 (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

'Jainism and ecology'

Again, the section is written in a laudatory tone, with phrases like 'a profound ecological philosophy', 'enduring relevance' etc., which would be more suitable for a Jain press release or advertising leaflet than for an encyclopedia, and the sources cited are, indeed, mostly Jain publications, which clearly can't be considered neutral, or necessarily reliable. ~2025-43840-74 (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Iconography

'Early Jain images from Mathura depict Digambara iconography until late fifth century CE where Svetambara iconography starts appearing.'

While the source does seem to be saying that most scholars have interpreted the early images to be Digambara, the author himself adheres to a different view, according to which the iconographies of the two sects were undifferentiated at the time; what he says appears in the late fifth century CE is a distinction between the two sects' iconographies. ~2025-43840-74 (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI