Talk:James Giles (philosopher)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Vulnerability and care theory of love was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 28 March 2014 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| Giles' theory of sexual desire was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 05 March 2014 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.james-giles.com/bio.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Naked Love Hypothesis review
There is a lot to be done so that the opposing view to this topic is represented. As it stands nothing about the academic response to it was included besides it being "prominent" which simply isn't true. 2A02:C7E:205B:3D00:3929:B853:3E25:DCA2 (talk) 16:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Mini-articles
I think several of Giles's ideas are given far too much weight in this article, as if the article was not a biography, but merely a vehicle for someone's attempts to legitimize the ideas. I don't have an opinion about Giles's personal notability, but some of his ideas seem hardly different from speculation. TooManyFingers (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)