Talk:Kaye Tuckerman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
adelaidenow
I can't read this source: <ref name="AdelaideNow">{{cite web|title=Adelaide Cabaret Festival: Broadway Bound|url=https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/entertainment/cabaret-festival/adelaide-cabaret-festival-2019-review-kaye-tuckerman-broadway-bound-but-not-gagged|accessdate=2024-11-15}}</ref> it was added to a sentence that was actually supported by a source that was used for the previous sentence. Polygnotus (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Best known for
If we have a source that says they've spent the last 2 years doing something, we can't use that for the claim that they are best known for that, right? Polygnotus (talk) 22:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
And of course a WP:REFBOMB was added, and the sources do not support the claim that Tuckerman was best known for that (that was the OR/SYNTH part). Polygnotus (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)