Talk:Kurapika
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Kurapika has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 24, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Summary
Girl?
Main image
Nominator: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 13:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kurapika/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 02:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
The article looks well-written. I have some points to address.
- "ScreenRant" should be changed to "Screen Rant", and "GameRant" should be changed to "Game Rant".
- I would suggest archiving the links with WP:IABOT. You may use the Internet Archive Bot Management Console, as I frequently do with anime-related articles. This decreases the likelihood of WP:LINKROT.
- The book Togashi Empire needs a publisher in the citation to avoid citation messages.
- The citation for "Shocking Hunter x Hunter Anime Ending That Togashi Rejected Surfaces" should not have the purple highlight when you open the source. This happens because part of the link has
#:~:text=in the URL. Ensure URLs do not have text that start with#:~:text=. - I would remove filler words, such as "so" in the sentence "He said he started the project without expecting it to be so tiring."
- I would change instances of "while", as noted in Gog the Mild's GAN/FAC checklist.
Overall, good work. If you make these changes, I plan to make this a good article. Z. Patterson (talk) 02:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I tried doing everything you asked but sadly I don't have the archiving tools. If possible could you use it? Cheers. Tintor2 (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I managed to install it through my cellphone. Tintor2 (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: I have determined the article is well-written, is well-structured, has no original research, is written in Wikipedia's tone, cites reliable sources, and attributes sources when appropriate. I recently promoted the article. Good work. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I managed to install it through my cellphone. Tintor2 (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)