Talk:LGBTQ people
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGBTQ people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
Frequently asked questions Please read the following FAQs before posting.
Q: Why is this and other articles titled LGBTQ and not LGBTQ+/LGBTQIA+?
A: Per Wikipedia policy on article titles, we follow the WP:COMMONNAME that reliable sources most commonly use. The current article titles of LGBTQ followed a long history of move discussions, that eventually led to the current title of LGBTQ after reliable data has shown to have shifted to use LGBTQ over any other variants in reliable sources in the move discussion in August 2024. Eventually in the future, it may be that LGBTQ+ will overtake LGBTQ in reliable sources, but for the time being, this is the reason for the current article title. For the term as a word, see LGBTQ (term), for the broader group of people it represents, see LGBTQ people. |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions
|
 | The content of Issues affecting LGBTQ people was merged into LGBTQ people on 28 September 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
"FABGLITTER" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect FABGLITTER has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 2 § FABGLITTER until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
"QAIP" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect QAIP has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 2 § QAIP until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
"Plusic" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Plusic has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 2 § Plusic until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:13, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
"LGBU" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect LGBU has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 2 § LGBU until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:14, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Acronym to LGBTQ+, LGBTQIA+, or 2SLGBTQIA+
I'm not sure if this talk has already occurred (the numerous redirects on this page are confusing me), but have we considered broadening the acronym we use here? I know there's a section that lists possible variations of the acronym, but is there a reason that we use LGBTQ instead of at least adding the + like "LGBTQ+," which is generally considered more inclusive? ThatCommieKid (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @ThatCommieKid: Hello. I believe the main discussion was at Talk:LGBTQ (term)/Archive 4#Requested move 14 August 2024. — Mudwater (Talk) 00:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- There have also been other discussions on various noticeboards, and I think the general consensus is that these expanded acronyms aren't necessary. Zenomonoz (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)