Talk:Laura Kampf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Laura Kampf is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) at 04:30, 6 November 2025 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | A fact from Laura Kampf appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 December 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
"Is a lesbian"
Sure, for a public person such as Laura, this is a reasonable information to share publicly. But it could be said differently. Anyone else feels the same about it? 2A00:20:10:C1D9:E8B7:A24A:63D:6DC0 (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Having it as the sole statement in a Personal life section was definitely rather odd but I think it is OK now that you have expanded it with a bit of additional info about other aspects of her personal life. DanielRigal (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ugh. I see that it got put back but the extra content was not in the source so that's fair enough. The extra content would be fine if there was a source for it though. Is there one? The only detail to be had from the current source is that her partner is an anesthesiologist. DanielRigal (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- She mentioned it in one of her recent youtube videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I69UDHdX2w.
- I don't know how to insert the link though :P 2003:FD:BF08:1E00:E59B:3BA8:66C9:338D (talk) 11:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- You should be able to tell the difference between "Personal life" and "Intimate life", shouldn't you? Darkdvd (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ugh. I see that it got put back but the extra content was not in the source so that's fair enough. The extra content would be fine if there was a source for it though. Is there one? The only detail to be had from the current source is that her partner is an anesthesiologist. DanielRigal (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think her recent Instagram post is a fitting end to this saga. Samsmachado (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 16:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that YouTuber Laura Kampf got millions of views on a video in which she built a project that did not work?
5x expanded by Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 56 past nominations.
— Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 05:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC).
- @Vigilantcosmicpenguin:, I was going to review this, but you haven't provided a second QPQ, which is required due to the backlog. I'll give you 48 hours but if you don't, I may close this. The first QPQ is done, just need to wait for a 2nd. JuniperChill (talk) 10:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- @JuniperChill: Whoops, didn't notice we were in backlog mode. I have now reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Saru (Star Trek: Discovery) as the second QPQ. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good. I should start reviewing this shortly. JuniperChill (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Article is new enough (expansion started on the 5th, nominated 3 days later), long enough (1463 to 11000, a 7,5x expansion), well sourced. Hook is interesting, cited to a reliable source and is present in the article. Two QPQs done as required. For anyone who wants to read the sourced article, its at the third paragraph. JuniperChill (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good. I should start reviewing this shortly. JuniperChill (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- @JuniperChill: Whoops, didn't notice we were in backlog mode. I have now reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Saru (Star Trek: Discovery) as the second QPQ. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
