Talk:List of first human settlements

The map and list have apparent discrepancies, such as when the list includes several asian pre-60k entries while the map shows post-60k dates.

I realize the map is showing vectors where larger patterns have been observed, while the list is inclusive of individual discoveries that may not align to those patterns and trends. So, while there isn't a likely 'fix' that makes the map fit all the list entries, perhaps an explanation would help, and/or individual markers/blips for entries that don't neatly fit the larger trends (yet?). Or the map could be revised. Or a second map could show individual (vs trend) sites from the list. ArtDent (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Also, the map shows migration out of eastern africa at 200kya when the Jebel Irhoud site shows it had already spread much before that. It's time for a new map. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jebel_Irhoud — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubecuber (talk • contribs) 11:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Has this been addressed? –jacobolus (t) 03:46, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Why for God sake Lepenski Vir is not on this list? Бојан Радусиновић — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uyashiba (talk • contribs) 07:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

I think this would make significantly more sense, as first implies the absolute first one, that is incompatible with a list. Geardona (talk) 04:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Why isn't Göbekli Tepe included in this list. It certainly is a settlement and is is at least 9,000 years bp.I'm not sure how to add it to the table. Wikipedia link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe Bruce A. WIlliamson (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

It says “Neanderthal Admixture.” Should it say “Gobeklitepe?” 2600:4040:203C:2300:CC1:9B44:1746:D655 (talk) 13:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)