Talk:Lithuania
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lithuania article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
You might be interested in visiting Lithuania Portal. There you can find some interesting information, tasks you could do, and a place to ask general (or not) questions, make comments, and ask for help with Lithuania-related topics. Dont forget to sign the guest book! |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section sizes
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding promotional content and source reliability
Dear editors,
I would like to raise a concern regarding a recently added sentence in the Economy section.
The statement relies on reference [204] (“Crypto license in Lithuania – Cryptocurrency license”, AdamSmith), which appears to be a commercial website operated by a private consulting firm actively promoting cryptocurrency licensing services. This creates a strong impression of promotional content, which conflicts with Wikipedia’s NOTADVERTISING and COI guidelines.
Additionally, the source does not appear to meet reliable source (WP:RS) standards. It is a self-published business page with a direct commercial interest in the topic and does not provide independent, authoritative evidence (such as official regulatory data or reputable third-party analysis) to support the claim.
The sentence itself is brief, lacks context, and does not meaningfully contribute to an encyclopedic understanding of Lithuania’s economy or regulatory environment. As presented, it appears more aimed at promoting a specific company than informing readers.
I kindly suggest reviewing this addition and considering its removal or replacement with neutral, well-sourced information from independent and authoritative references. Thank you for your attention.
Best regards, Carlos CarlosBigMan (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
See RFC concerning Lithuania
See RFC discussion. -- GoodDay (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: The primary topic of the RfC is not Lithuania, but the short desc used on three articles. That is not clear from the above; therefore, it should be worded as such, like this:
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Estonia § RFC: Short description of Baltic states. Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
"Litauen" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Litauen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 31 § Litauen until a consensus is reached. Chrisahn (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
"Psichologija" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Psichologija has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 7 § Psichologija until a consensus is reached. Mathguy2718 (talk) 23:54, 7 February 2026 (UTC)