Talk:Meovv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 29 April 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to MEOVV. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 29 April 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Largely based on the opinion that MEOVV is not an acronym or abbreviation, which was the primary argument for a move here, and although whether it is wasn't settled, others opposed adjusting the title as it could be expressed in uppercase for marketing purposes, a practice which Wikipedia generally does not follow. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 14:11, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Meovv → MEOVVMEOVV – Their name stands for "My Eyes Open VVide (wide)". ^[1]

References

[1]
https://m.entertain.naver.com/article/468/0001091393

ItzyWooah (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

No where did the referenced article states that their name is meant to be an anagram. George13lol2 (talk) 22:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

See the 'Name' section. — Werter1995 (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Reading the article, I see the explanation of the group's name being: "To add some artistic fun, we ended up writing 'MEOW' as 'MEOVV' and I liked that each letter represents our members. I liked the team name from the moment I first heard it." This reads as the name is derived from writing the word "Meow" as "Meovv", not that the name is an anagram. Flabshoe1 (talk) 20:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Support their name is an acronym. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 00:15, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Support, really acronym. — Werter1995 (talk) 05:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Also there are other groups whose names are acronyms and are also in all caps (ex. STAYC, DIA, NU'EST, I.O.I, etc.) ItzyWooah (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose per Flabshoe, the name is a backronym and this is more of marketing a gimmick than anything meaningful. It is pronounced as "meow", not "em ee oh vee vee", the acronym is clearly secondary. orangesclub 🍊 07:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

STAYC's article is also an acromyn and written in all caps but it isn't pronounced as "es tee ei wai see" ItzyWooah (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

I understand but "MEOVV" being an acronym doesn't make sense, seeing as the w is stylistically swapped for vv. VVide isn't a word to create an acronym out of - I'd understand if it were My Eyes Open Very Vastly, but as we have it now, it almost seems like it should be MEOVv which isn't the answer. I still oppose this move. orangesclub 🍊 23:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Oppose According to Orangeclub and Flabshoe, the page shouldn't be renamed to MEOVV. While Meovv can be interpreted as an acronym for My Eyes Open VVide (Wide), that meaning came later and was mainly created for branding purposes. The original inspiration for the name actually came from the word “Meow,” not the abbreviation. In contrast, groups like STAYC made their abbreviation the primary identity, with the pronunciation being secondary — a distinction Meovv does not share. Yuzuhasenkki (Hot Mess, Hot Mess!) 04:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Women in Music, WikiProject Korea, and WikiProject Pop music have been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Oppose the supposed acronym is a flimsy marketing gimmick at best. The “VV” makes it pretty well not an acronym as “VV” does not mean “w”. 47.55.185.159 (talk) 13:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Weak ~~support~~ oppose, prefer to wait 3–6 months. Whether or not MEOVV is an acronym is irrelevant or at best secondary; what matters is usage in outside sources. This is clearly a marketing gimmick that has been adopted by numerous K-pop groups. Wikipedia avoids these unless independent, reliable sources overwhelmingly follow all-caps or other creative styling (see MOS:CAPS and WP:TMCAPS). I looked at the first five pages of Google News results, and out of 50 articles, only three did not did not use all-caps. (The third reference, Entertainment Paper, is apparently blacklisted.) Among the 47 pieces that do use all caps were The Hollywood Reporter and Teen Vogue, along with many sources that are based in South Korea and/or appear dedicated to K-pop. Since sources do show a clear preference, the move is arguably justified, but it's possible usage will shift if this group has sustained coverage in a range of sources. It would be better to re-evaluate in a few months. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 17:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

As a sanity check, THR generally does not put Blackpink in all caps but TV does. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 21:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Changed to weak oppose upon further consideration. We really should avoid indulging this usage. Still only "weak" because sources do support all-caps.--MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 20:51, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Oppose based on information from others Iwillpeeonadime (talk) 8:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles