Talk:MikeWorldWide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edit
please edit the article if you think it needs more/less information. thanks for looking at my work.Geosaifre (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Why is MWW Noteable
Aside from being owned by a major Democratic fundraiser what makes this page notable one may wonder. I'd propose merging this page into Michael Kempner page as it does not appear that this page has notable sources outside of meager trade publications. Would appreciate if any editors from said PR firm identify themselves prior to commenting on these pages. Richard Thoma (talk) 11:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Anthony Weiner
Have added Anthony Weiner, but would propose to create a subsection around Weiner high profile presence at the firm. Welcome commentary. Theyarecoming1313 (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
MikeWorldWide Edit Request
| Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |
Hello, I am an employee of MikeWorldWide and I have acknowledged my WP:COI for this article on my talk page. I would like to request assistance in updating this page with more recent information to improve its accuracy. Thank you in advance for your help!
Image thumbnail:
- Please replace the older image "File:MWW E Rutherford from Rte 3 jeh.jpg" with the newer "File:MWW NYC Lobby.jpg", which reflects the changed agency name.
History section:
- I'm requesting removal of the statement "In 2016, the Scholastic Corporation, BDI and AMP Agency brought lawsuits against MikeWorldWide for alleged payment disputes." as these lawsuits did not proceed and the source URL is a 404.
- Please also remove the statement "In 2018, the company launched a Sports and Entertainment practice and opened a new location in Charlotte, North Carolina." as the office mentioned here has been closed.
- Please add to the end of this section "MikeWorldWide acquired London-based agency, Chameleon in April 2021." Source: https://www.provokemedia.com/latest/article/mikeworldwide-acquires-uk-technology-specialist-chameleon
- To enhance the company's more recent history, I would like to add "MikeWorldWide was named to Forbes' 2021 list of America's Best PR Agencies." Source: https://www.forbes.com/lists/best-pr-agencies/
- Please add "Also in 2021, MikeWorldWide was awarded a grand prize in Ragan's PR Daily Awards for their work with OMRON Healthcare." Source: https://www.prdaily.com/campaign-around-omron-healthcares-wearable-blood-pressure-monitors-exceeds-sales-traffic-and-media-goals/
Best, Donahueegrace (talk) 16:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done Unsure that this is necessary and the suggested photo feels a little too promotional to me.
Not done per WP:DEADLINK and I have added an archive link. If there are reliable sources discussing the cases not going ahead, please list them
Not done It's reliably sourced as is, and whether it has since closed is irrelevant. If there is a source confirming this (can be the company's website) then this can be added.
Done
Not done This would need a secondary source i.e. neither MikeWorldWide or Forbes
Not done See WP:ORGAWARDS - this would need a source other than MikeWorldWide, PR Daily or OMRON to merit inclusion.
Update request
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I am an employee of MikeWorldWide, and I have acknowledged my WP:COI for this article on my talk page. I’d like to request your assistance in updating this page. Thank you in advance!
Please add the following update to the History section:
In November 2024, MikeWorldWide launched Everywhere, an in-house agency specializing in influencer, content, and social media marketing.
Source: PRWeek
This entry details a significant business development and strategic direction of the company. TheBlueOwl (talk) 07:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Done Encoded Talk 💬 13:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! TheBlueOwl (talk) 16:54, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
NPOV: Update request
| Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |
Hi fellow Wikipedians,
As an employee of MikeWorldWide, I have acknowledged my WP:COI for this article on my talk page. I kindly request assistance in updating this page to improve its neutrality.
History section:
1. Please Add (after the paragraph about the Tesla/MWW deal):
- An MikeWorldWide spokesperson told CNBC that the agency consulted with Tesla from 2017 to 2018 on a broad employee communications engagement.
- The spokesperson added that reviewing media coverage and public social conversation about a company is a common practice for gaining insights into a company's public perception. "Tesla paid PR firm to surveil employees on Facebook in 2017 amid union push". CNBC.
Neutral Point of View (NPOV): Presenting the CNBC report's findings and MikeWorldWide's official response (and the contextual information about Dave Arnold) is crucial for adhering to Wikipedia's NPOV policy. It shows both sides of the reported issue, presenting different perspectives.
2. Please Delete: "Former and current Tesla employees told CNBC that they believe the company continues to monitor its workers on social media."
This information is outdated and irrelevant to the article about the agency.
Thank you! TheBlueOwl (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Yes Added additional content from the original source to present the viewpoints in accordance with their significance as reflected in the original source WP:NPOV
Not done Unsure why you claim this section should be removed.
Wrontheroof (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! TheBlueOwl (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @Wrontheroof! To respond to the second request, the content is unduly detailed and only tangentially related to the subject of the article —because it focuses on Testa's assumed ongoing practices, its relevance level is "Very low." (WP:RELEVANCE). TheBlueOwl (talk) 15:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)