Talk:Neologism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neologism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Neologism is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recently deleted link
The following recently deleted link is moved here:
- Langmaker.com, a regularly updated directory of over 1,100 invented languages and neographies.
According to the root link, http://www.langmaker.com, the Langmaker website has been "temporarily" disabled. It is moved here so that it may be checked from time to time to see if it has been re-enabled. Then it may be added back to the article. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 19:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
It's interesting to note that the Langmaker site has been archived. The web archive is at:
- Archive.IS
- Langmaker's "About" page, the link that was deleted
- Langmakers Main Page from June 2008
Apparently, the wiki-ish website is down for the count. These archived pages are searchable and might still prove useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paine Ellsworth (talk • contribs) 00:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
create page: neologicism
neological (adjective)
- Of or pertaining to neology
- Of or pertaining to neologicism (modern logicism which accepts the difference between proof, substantiality and experimental axiomatic systems).
2A02:2149:8B83:6500:7813:142C:413A:4290 (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Nevertheless
The current page states "is any newly formed word, term, or phrase that nevertheless has achieved popular or institutional recognition and is becoming accepted into mainstream language". Nevertheless what? It isn't clear even in the initial edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neologism&oldid=1158732740
It's a bit odd that an article around linguistics has held a semantically meaningless summary for a year. I have no formal background in the field and hesitate to correct the grammar as I'm quite certain I'll fall foul of the classic trope. Youse lot generally think ussins need to wise the bap, so I'll houl me wisht.
BeardedChimp (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- nevertheless that it's new. duh 2601:441:8583:D320:EDCA:E862:3B9:69F (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
"Neolism" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Neolism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 17 § Neolism until a consensus is reached. SeaHaircutSoilReplace 05:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)