Talk:Nuclear power

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under the section titled 'Safety' in the third paragraph 'With a death rate of 0.07 per TWh' should be changed to 'With a death rate of 0.03 per TWh'. The source is citation 199 in the nuclear power page, which is this article ^[1]. This is the source cited for the original statistic, but I believe it was copied incorrectly. ThePiMaven (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Fixed. It was not copied incorrectly, but the source has been updated in 2022, based on more recent analysis and estimates. --TuomoS (talk) 20:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Looking back through, the graph shown at the start of the safety section uses the old statistic and also should be corrected. ThePiMaven (talk) 20:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change number of employees from 556 to 329.

I’m an employee there and this is the number listed in our Outlook directory. It is well known publicly that we had significant layoffs in 2024 (~28% in January and then ~10% more in July). 131.150.2.197 (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: I think you added this to the wrong article. This is the article on nuclear power. It does not have any employee counts that I can find. meamemg (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

The lead section states that nuclear power is sustainable. But the Wikipedia article on sustainable energy states "There is controversy over whether nuclear power is sustainable." There is a lack of consistency between these two articles. I think one or both of the articles should be changed so they are consistent. I would like to know what others think. T g7 (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

The lead is supposed to summarize the article, and the content should be sourced somewhere in the article. I'd look for where those statements are sourced in each article and go from there in order to summarize all available and good sources. ---Avatar317^(talk) 02:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

By "fukushima incident" section the graph frame on right says "Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org." No indication when graphs will show again, or when they were broken. Why not leave the old graphs until new ones work ? If shared code broke, why was it not backed out ? When did graphs break, when did the "technical issues" start ? - Rod57 (talk) 00:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Those are very good questions, that however have no answer since more than a year due to disinterest from the Wikimedia foundation. Ita140188 (talk) 09:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)