Talk:Pan Am

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Former featured articlePan Am is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 14, 2005.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 17, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 21, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 10, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
July 16, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 4, 2004, December 4, 2007, and December 4, 2011.
Current status: Former featured article
Close
More information This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:, WikiProject Companies To-do: ...
Close

Merge proposal

I propose merging Pan Am (1996–1998) and Pan Am (1998–2004) into Pan Am. Both pages are poorly sourced with Pan am II only having 4 sources total with only 2 of them being considered “reliable” per WP:RS. Pan am III has no reliable sources and only archived images that are used as “research”. I could find no reliable sources of these companies other than blogs and mentions of them in articles about the upcoming Pan Am (see wp:INDEPENDENT). I propose that the content from these pages be added to an “attempted revivals” section of this page.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Fife SB (talkcontribs) 16:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Tenerife disaster

Looking at the history of the talk page, it seems that the Tenerife airport disaster was at least mentioned in this article in 2007, but no longer appears anywhere in the article. It seems like the airline's involvement in the worst air disaster in history bears mention here, even though KLM was at fault for the crash. KiraLiz1 | she/her 20:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

The stewardesses

They don't count as crew according to the current wikipedia page. Pan am treated them like avocados. Only the very few were just right - the right height, weight, age (literally "retired" at 32 - pensioner, right??),marital status and childlessless. So they were attractive enough and without obligations to.. prostitute themselves? This should be a main aspect of the page, not the glory of this airline, built on the backs of women trying to make it in the world. 94.254.103.143 (talk) 23:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place to right great wrongs. - ZLEA T\C 01:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI