Talk:Scott Morrison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scott Morrison article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A news item involving Scott Morrison was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 August 2018. |  |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2024
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Scott created the robot debt that crippled the poor 49.182.108.59 (talk) 06:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. kemel49(connect)(contri) 10:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Dubious
Is the claim that "Normal practice in Australia calls for a defeated prime minister to stay in office as a caretaker until the final results are known" true? It normally takes weeks for final results to be known. Steelkamp (talk) 12:09, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- No, it's not true. Normal practice is for a defeated prime minister to stay in office as a caretaker until the main result is clear, which is usually known on election night, and then for a few more days until such time as the new government is ready to be sworn in. That can occur as soon as the Tuesday after the election, as happened in 1972. On that occasion, the final results were so far from being known that Gough Whitlam and Lance Barnard were sworn in as two-man government, because they weren't prepared to wait for the results of closely contested seats that required multiple distributions of preferences, but wanted to start implementing their agenda asap. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Possible AI-generated text
Hi - I've added the AI generated template here, specifically regarding the edits by Ritwik Deuba; other edits by this user have shown indications of possible LLM use in the past, as do these. Thus they need review for accuracy, sourcing issues, possible NPOV/editorializing issues, and the like. Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2025 (UTC)