Talk:Second Holocaust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: Parts of this page are restricted Parts of this article are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. If it is unclear which parts of the page are covered, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
A fact from Second Holocaust appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Second Holocaust be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Israel may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
... that Menachem Begin claimed that he had prevented another Holocaust by bombing an Iraqi nuclear reactor?ALT1:... that Mike Pence said that "The Iranian regime openly advocates another Holocaust"?ALT2:... that Israeli president Reuven Rivlin opposes the political invocation of another Holocaust, calling it "fundamentally wrong" and "dangerous"?
Converted from a redirect by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 01:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC).
@Buidhe: New enough, long enough, QPQ done, copyvio 26.5%, interesting hooks, but here are my concerns:
- Ref 15 should cite The Times of Israel instead of www.timesofisrael.com.
- ALT1 has WP:NPOV issues. For the article to be neutral, you should also explain why Pence made these accusations instead of just a one-sentence quote.
- I'd go with ALT0, but it needs some work. I'd propose it as ALT0a: ... that Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin claimed that he had prevented another Holocaust by bombing an Iraqi nuclear reactor? I'd also suggest adding a picture of Begin to the article and this proposal.
- Not related to DYK, but the photo of Bridget Loves Bernie doesn't belong in the article because it isn't mentioned in the prose and doesn't enhance the reader's understanding.
- Let me know with a ping when you've addressed these concerns. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 19:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Did you know/Citation says nothing about such minor details in citations.
- Fine, that's why I provided 3 hooks.
- Why did you strike ALT0? WP:DYKHOOK does not require links other than the one to the featured article. 3 links in one hooks is too many imo.
- I appreciate constructive suggestions, but please keep them separate from comments that are related to the DYK criteria and eligibility of the article and hook. buidhe 21:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: The point was that you did not introduce who Menachem Begin was, so that hook has no context. Again, neutrality issues still haven't been addressed; that pertains to the article, not just the hooks. Also, I perceived the incorrect citation as bordering a bare URL, my mistake. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- I fail to see how the absense of context could be a WP:NPOV issue, which "means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." Nevertheless, I've added some. I also do not see how what Begin looks like would be remotely relevant to the article or the hook. I wouldn't object to ALT0a with minor modifications: ALT0b:
"... that Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin said that he had prevented another Holocaust by bombing an Iraqi nuclear reactor?"but I also do not see anything wrong with the original hook. buidhe 21:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)- @Buidhe: Because Pence claiming that Iran wants "Another Holocaust" is a clearly loaded statement that definitely required context. Why are you so opposed to wikilinks to Begin and Operation Opera? Read MOS:LINK, it makes it easier for readers to find information which is what we want to do. The photo of Begin would be because he is the subject of the quote, as is typical for DYK. It would also make your DYK eligible for a top spot, but it's okay to not want that. Also... you say you appreciate the constructive criticism but have kept the irrelevant photo in the article and you haven't fixed the one incorrect citation. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 22:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's time to move on. ALT0b is okay but we usually say "claim" in these cases rather than "said". I am also linking Operation Opera:
- ALT0c: ... that Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin claimed that he had prevented another Holocaust by bombing an Iraqi nuclear reactor?
ALT0c hook ref AGF and cited inline. The article is pretty start-class but that's ok for DYK. Rest of review per Nice4What. ALT0c good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: Because Pence claiming that Iran wants "Another Holocaust" is a clearly loaded statement that definitely required context. Why are you so opposed to wikilinks to Begin and Operation Opera? Read MOS:LINK, it makes it easier for readers to find information which is what we want to do. The photo of Begin would be because he is the subject of the quote, as is typical for DYK. It would also make your DYK eligible for a top spot, but it's okay to not want that. Also... you say you appreciate the constructive criticism but have kept the irrelevant photo in the article and you haven't fixed the one incorrect citation. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 22:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- I fail to see how the absense of context could be a WP:NPOV issue, which "means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." Nevertheless, I've added some. I also do not see how what Begin looks like would be remotely relevant to the article or the hook. I wouldn't object to ALT0a with minor modifications: ALT0b:
- @Buidhe: The point was that you did not introduce who Menachem Begin was, so that hook has no context. Again, neutrality issues still haven't been addressed; that pertains to the article, not just the hooks. Also, I perceived the incorrect citation as bordering a bare URL, my mistake. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hamas' Final Solution
It seems Hamas is trying to begin the second Holocaust, and it's certainly the biggest threat to the Jewish people since World War II, so maybe both pages should link each other. And there's also tensions in other nations right now, given the pro-Palestinian protest in New York City included neo-Nazis. 2001:8003:AD13:F800:2791:E749:3543:BC9F (talk) 09:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Who says that hamas (cca. 1.500 fighters armed with bunch of home-made rockets and small arms, enclosed in an open-air conc-lager without any semblance of infrastructure and organization on any kind or level, not even on level of poorest of the poor states) can pose an existential threat that would lead to "second holocaust" or genocide of a nation with a high tech military and security state aparatus and a nuclear super-power with unconditional support in Europe, UK and US ?! This article as it is is already too much for English Wikipedia to continue claim its adherence to WP:NPOV and Wikipedia:Notability. ౪ Santa ౪99° 11:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- are you out of your mind because they clearly don't have capability to do so, because you know their weaponry are pretty limited. Rifa10z (talk) 10:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Iran's Final Solution
Iran was struck by Israeli missiles on June 13, and has declared war. Israel has also threatened to wipe the Hitler-worshipping government out. This may lead to another Holocaust, if not World War III. 2001:8003:B431:C100:B097:1415:C452:EEBB (talk) 04:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 19 March 2026
| It has been proposed in this section that Second Holocaust be renamed and moved to Second Holocaust allegations. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Second Holocaust → Second Holocaust allegations – In the same vein of Palestinian genocide allegations, this was not confirmed and therefore needs to be moved. Abesca (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, WikiProject Death, WikiProject Ethnic groups, WikiProject Human rights, WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Judaism, WikiProject Discrimination, WikiProject Israel, WikiProject Religion, and WikiProject Disaster management have been notified of this discussion. Abesca (talk) 23:54, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
- This is about a concept. A better proposal would be the Second Holocaust concept. I don’t think `allegations` make sense - because it’s not saying X event constitutes a second Holocaust 🐈Cinaroot 00:33, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
oppose this article is clearly about a belief, unsubstantiated claims or fear of this happening in the future, not about a documented event—blindlynx 15:01, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose article is about a broad rhetorical concept not speciifc allegations one is actually happening. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Newbzy (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)





