Talk:List of Marvel Comics characters: L
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Luna Snow was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 March 2025 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Marvel Comics characters: L. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| Content from multiple pages has been merged into this article. | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Left-Winger merge
DGG has established a merge for Left-Winger. If any of you either support this or object to this, please write your decisions here. --Rtkat3 (talk) 22:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Merge
Locksmith (comics) can be merged here briefly, it does not need to be deleted. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:D47A:4F19:75EE:A8CB (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Unless there's more to this character than is currently mentioned in the article, it should absolutely be deleted. This is not an indiscriminate list and a character who appeared in two issues of a C-list title isn't worth including. As far as I can tell, this page isn't linked in line by any other articles - all the incoming links are from the Spider-Woman template. Saving this information serves no purpose. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Merge
Locksmith (comics) can be merged here briefly, it does not need to be deleted. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Own page for Luna Snow
can we create an article for Luna Snow so she can have her own page please? Roswell2000 (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'd advise you to look at the previous discussion regarding this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luna Snow, where multiple arguments were raised for both keeping the article and merging it to the list entry. Ultimately, the substance of the arguments weighs more heavily than the sheer number of votes cast, so the closing admin reached the conclusion that the result of the discussion was to merge. Given the sufficient coverage of the character at the list entry and the merits of the closed discussion, I don't see any luck in getting the standalone article reinstated any time soon, but I'd like to note that that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
