Talk:Sweet Baby Inc.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sweet Baby Inc. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Sweet Baby Inc." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
Q1: Can I use a particular article as a source?
A1: What sources can be used in Wikipedia is governed by our reliable sources guideline, which requires "published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". If you have a question about whether or not a particular source meets this policy, a good place to ask is the Reliable sources noticeboard. Q2: I found a post on Twitter, a YouTube video, or a blog that relates to Sweet Baby Inc. Can I use it as a source in the article?
A2: All sources used in the article must comply with Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources. Self-published sources cannot be used for content on living persons. If such sources were used, then gossip, slander, and libelous material may find its way into the article, which would tarnish the quality of Wikipedia's information and potentially open up Wikipedia to legal action. For further information, please read the guidelines for sources in biographies of living persons. Q3: Why is Wikipedia preventing me from editing the article? Why is this article biased towards one party or the other?
A3: Content on Wikipedia is required to maintain a neutral point of view as much as possible, and is based on information from reliable sources. The article is under protection due to constant edit warring and addition of unsourced or unreliably sourced information prohibited by our policy on biographical content concerning living people (see WP:BLP). Q4: The "reliable sources" don't tell the full story. Why can't we use other sources?
A4: Verifiability in reliable sources governs what we write. Wikipedia documents what reliable sources say. If those sources are incorrect or inadequate, it is up to other reliable sources to correct this. Wikipedia's role is not to correct the mistakes of the world; it is to write an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable sources.In addition, this article falls under concerns relating to content on living persons. Sources that discuss unverified or unsupported claims about living persons cannot be included at all—including on the talk page. Editors should review the talk page archives here before suggesting a new source from non-mainstream sources to make sure that it hasn't been discussed previously. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the Wikipedia policies on canvassing and neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Progressivism in Canada
Can I put this in the category "Progressivism in Canada?"Sarah from Queens (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Sarah from Queens
- That category is more for political movements and organisations, not private companies whose employees have progressive views. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:18, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- The USA equivalent of the category includes individuals and companies. Sarah from Queens (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- At a quick glance, I can only spot one or two, but I'd argue those are also misplaced anyway. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- The USA equivalent of the category includes individuals and companies. Sarah from Queens (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2026 (UTC)