Talk:Trinnov Audio

This draft was prepared with reference to multiple independent, reliable secondary sources, including mainstream French business press (e.g., Le Figaro), financial and regional business coverage (e.g., CFNews, La Gazette Éco), professional audio publications (e.g., Sound On Sound, Recording Magazine), and Audio Engineering Society convention documentation.

The article focuses on company history and third-party coverage rather than product specifications, in order to align with WP:GNG and WP:CORP guidance.

All citations are independent of the company and have been archived for verification.

Feedback from experienced editor User:Kvng during early discussion suggested that broader news coverage exists beyond initial sourcing and that the topic appears unlikely to face deletion in the current sourcing context.

Additional improvements can be made if reviewers identify specific gaps. Benoitmunoz (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Author asserts they are human. See additional discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#LLM declines ~Kvng (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

@Benoitmunoz and Kvng: Now that this is in mainspace, I have tagged it as highly likely LLM-generated or, at best, written by a human with the assistance of an LLM. I do not have the industry background to assess the notability of this company or the quality of the sources; I am only assessing the writing style and the way the sources have been used. This little article is a textbook illustration of WP:Signs of AI writing § Undue emphasis on significance, legacy, and broader trends. Almost every sentence is a variation on "Multiple publications have said something about this company." As a reviewer, the bare minimum that I expect is that the author has read the sources and can summarise what they say about why the company and its products are so special.

For the record, the draft was created in February, when the 2025 version of NEWLLM was in effect, viz. Large language models should not be used to generate new Wikipedia articles from scratch. There's no smoking gun here that qualifies for G15, just strong evidence that Benoit has not written much, if any, of the text here or read any of the sources. This is especially surprising considering your "professional affiliation" with Trinnov. I'm used to COI editors drowning their drafts in superlatives, whereas you seem to have erred on the side of not telling us much about Trinnov beyond "this company exists and makes audio products". As I said, I'm not very familiar with audio tech, but I recognise both Sound on Sound and Le Figaro, and it looks like there's plenty of material in those two sources alone. Of course this article shouldn't read like a press release or product catalogue, but in its current state it's lacking even basic description and context. For comparison, here are two Start-class articles about audio production companies of similar vintage: Native Instruments, PreSonus. Surely a new article about a company founded in 2003 could have at least half the level of detail and specificity of these two examples.

As noted, Benoit has a COI and can only make edit requests, but Kvng, perhaps you'd be interested in helping to flesh this out? ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for enumerating your concerns with this article. I did encourage the author to concentrate on finding the supporting reliable sources and keep the prose short due to their COI. I am confident the article will be improved. I am keeping it on my watchlist and will try to give it some love along the way. ~Kvng (talk) 15:19, 21 April 2026 (UTC)