Talk:Untitled (collection)/GA2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 20:40, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk · contribs) 23:59, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


Dibs on this review. Will start in a bit! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Criteria:

  • Well-written
    • The prose is clear, concise, and understandable. checkY
    • The page abides by MOS. I made two very minor copyedits (replacing a curly quote and removing some unnecessary paragraph breaks at the end). checkY
  • Verifiability
    • WP:EARWIG says copyvio is unlikely. checkY
    • Spot-checking
      • Source 1 - yes checkY
      • Source 13 - yes checkY
      • Source 19 - yes checkY
      • Source 23 - yes checkY
      • Source 53 - yes checkY
      • Source 55 - this source says that Gosling worked on soundtracks for McQueen but does not mention this collection specifically. Question?
        • That's correct; ref 54 supports Gosling's work on Untitled (I can send over a screencap as this book is difficult to access online), while ref 55 supports him as a regular collaborator.
      • Source 63 - yes checkY
      • Source 64 - yes checkY
      • Source 78 - yes checkY
      • Source 79 - yes checkY
      • Source 80 - yes checkY
      • Source 81 - yes checkY
  • Broad in coverage
    • The page addresses the main aspects of the topic and stays focused. checkY
  • Neutral
    • The page is neutral. Opinions are all attributed. checkY
  • Stable
    • The page appears to have had some recent vandalism, including one revision that has been hidden. Is this a concern? Question?
      • Generally, vandalism (especially a one-off instance) is not considered an issue with regards to stability; stability refers to stuff like disputes over content or if the article is still being constructed at the time of the review.
  • Illustrated
    • All three images are appropriately licensed on Wikimedia Commons. checkY
    • All three images are relevant and have suitable captions. checkY
@Premeditated Chaos: Hi, this seems mostly good, I just have a few concerns as seen above. Feel free to take your time! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Hi Art, thanks for the review. I've answered the above. Any concerns with regards to prose? I aim for FAC so please be picky about anything that catches your eye. PMC (talk) 01:19, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI