Talk:Winter Spring Summer or Fall/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: M.Billoo2000 (talk · contribs) 21:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Cooldood5555 (talk · contribs) 03:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Preliminary notes: Appears to meet GA criteria. References are good, writing is good, it’s WP:NPOV. Recommend it is passed after a full review.

Lead section: I see no issues, other than maybe the attribution to studios being slightly clunky. Improving that would make a significant difference. Visual also looks good. (Forgot to sign originally, it’s been about 20 minutes) Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Plot: Very informal language used throughout. Slightly under linked. Otherwise, does a good job explaining things. Would recommend prioritizing fixing informal language. Also a bit too in depth. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Cast: Looks good, but not sourced. Could use a source. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 03:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Production: Quite a few grammatical errors. Somewhat informal language at points. That needs to be fixed. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 03:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Release: Nothing spectacular. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 03:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Reception: Very well done. Written very much from an NPOV, weighing positives and negatives from reviews. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 03:57, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Sources: Not all are super reliable, but they’re good enough. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

I do not believe this article is worthy of good article status. Production section is a mess, plot needs formal grammar (i.e. changing “smoked some weed” to “smoked some marijuana”), studio attribution in lead should be improved. I do not believe this article is ready at this time nor will it be in the near future. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 23:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Cooldood5555! It seems while you failed this article, I would like to remind you that article placed on hold usually have a week to improve, so if you think the article can meet GA standards within a week, you can place it on hold. I also noticed that the article hasn't been marked failed: marking an article passed or failed manually is a super big hassle, so if you aren't, I highly recommend using GANReviewTool which automates the process. Crystalite13 (talk) 22:08, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about the tool! I do not believe the article could be improved within a week, though. Signed, Cooldood5555 🩷 (talk) 22:48, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

• Nominator comment: The above has been un-endorsed by the reviewer Special:Diff/1341135974 and the other user involved Special:Diff/1336760335. Please see talk page discussion here below before deciding. Thank you! M. Billoo 16:10, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

---

• @Cooldood5555 and Crystalite13: Hi. I do not what is going on; the article has been a GAN for past few months, and a sudden review failed it without any notification. While there are comments above, a certain time should have been given for improvement and feedback. I am also pinging a co-contributor, Converse1991, and I may request re-opening the GAN or any second review. Sad. M. Billoo 08:39, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I didn't look at the article, only the review, and sort of took the reviewer's words and left it at that. They seemed to think it absolutely could not be improved in the standard week timeframe, but I could've pushed a little more, as the week long period isn't also a strict requirement. Apologizes. @M.Billoo2000: Crystalite13 (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• Please also see my version of the plot summary before it was taken over by the co-contributor. And if there is any phrasing issue under the #Production section, I am here to modify. Please highlight, thank you. M. Billoo 07:07, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

  Hi. Sorry for the late response. I will do that for you after I get out of school today (~8 hours from now) Coolgurl5555 🩷 (talk)(sign) 14:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  Plot was still a mess. Awful grammar throughout. I’ll look through production. Coolgurl5555 🩷 (talk)(sign) 23:14, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  “Ortega (left) and White (right) appeared as teenage lovers; the two also starred in Netflix series Wednesday(2022) while they were filming for the Winter Spring Summer or Fall. The director called their bond as "lightning in a bottle", and called Ortega as the filmmakers' "first choice" and "dream team", while recalling her tight schedule with availability of about an 11-day window.[2][4][5]” is far too long for an image caption

  “which she accepted excitedly.” isn’t encyclopedic language.

  Otherwise, I guess there’s nothing specific, but it does feel a little bit clunky. Coolgurl5555 🩷 (talk)(sign) 23:20, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Pinging Converse1991 for the plot summary. M. Billoo 10:16, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Coolgurl5555: Thank you for responding. Can you please elaborate was still and clunky in your statements? It would be helpful, otherwise we have re-edited some after your comments. Please remember that my original concern was GAN, thank you! M. Billoo 09:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that at this point it is ready to be resubmitted to be honest. Coolgurl5555 🩷 (talk)(sign) 17:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Prhartcom Hi. Please refer to this coversation above and Special:Diff/1341143298. Your recent edits again notified me of failing GAN without any prior notice or valid discussion. Also, is there any other way that I go formal? Thank you! M. Billoo 15:48, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Billoo, all you need to do is follow the advice of the reviewer and then see if they will pass this review. For example, if they are asking you to fix issues with the Plot section, you should do it, or else their opinion will not change and the article will not become GA. Prhartcom (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

@Prhartcom: All issues were already addressed. This review was a mistake and thus unendorsed. However, thank you for merging the discussion to avoid any future confusions. M. Billoo 17:28, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

@Coolgurl5555: Hi. Please do something, otherwise this error keeps occuring. Thank you. M. Billoo 15:52, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

I’m sorry but I am honestly unsure of what to do. - coolgurl5555 🩷 (talk)(sign) (she/her) 22:20, 4 April 2026 (UTC)