User:Begoon/ACE2015
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a sortable table - click arrows in header row...
| Candidate | Comments | Opinion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Callanecc | Officious, rules-bound. Not what I'm looking for at all. |  Oppose | 5 |
| Casliber | Proven record. Sense of humour. Common sense. Experience. Obvious support. |  Support | 1 |
| Drmies | Sometimes a little too "cliquey", but I nearly always agree with his decisions. He has wikipedia's interests at heart. Would do well in the role. | Support | 4 |
| Gamaliel | Too political/drama prone. I don't like GamePlayers and Gamaliel is one of those. Do not trust to be neutral. | Oppose | 9 |
| GorillaWarfare | Too political. Activist. Thinks you can recuse then unrecuse. Do not trust to be neutral. | Oppose | 7 |
| Hawkeye7 | Desysopped for cause. | Oppose | 12 |
| Hullaballoo Wolfowitz | Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed. | Support | 18 |
| Keilana | Just doesn't give the "responsible and ready for authority" vibe to me. Sorry. | Oppose | 3 |
| Kelapstick | Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed. | Support | 6 |
| Kevin Gorman | Too political. Breeze-driven activist. Seeks out drama and often makes poor decisions. Craves power/recognition. Do not trust to be neutral. No. | Oppose | 15 |
| Kirill Lokshin | Disappeared, then returned to explain and "demonstrate" how he could do what other admins were "too scared" to do. Don't trust his motives. Do not trust to be neutral. | Oppose | 8 |
| Kudpung | Means well, I think, deep down, but utterly fails to convey that, often upsetting users new and old with a surly and rude manner. Also seems very inflexible. Acted ludicrously on his questions page. Not suited for position(s) of responsibility, imo. I seem to remember he was not always like this - maybe time has taken a toll? | Oppose | 13 |
| LFaraone | I have not been impressed with his tenure to date. May mature for another term later. | Oppose | 11 |
| Mahensingha | Too inexperienced. | Oppose | 21 |
| MarkBernstein | Too political. Activist. Seeks out drama. Here for Mark Bernstein. No. | Oppose | 19 |
| NE Ent | I'd like to have supported Ent. It's a close call for me, but in the end I'm not comfortable he has the right balance between IAR and applying the strict letter of the law.
That's particularly important for this role, and flexibility is a crucial quality I'm looking for here. |
 Neutral | 17 |
| Opabinia regalis | Excellent candidate. Would be a boon to the committee. Fresh and innovative. | Support | 2 |
| Rich Farmbrough | Have to stay on the fence. I like Rich - lots of common sense, but can be a touch too intransigent. That's not a good thing for ArbCom. | Neutral | 14 |
| Thryduulf | Poor performance in current committee. Officious, inflexible and rules-bound | Oppose | 10 |
| Timtrent | I'd like to support this candidate, but just too milquetoast, plus some odd edits wrt NOTCENSORED give me pause | Neutral | 16 |
| Wildthing61476 | Too inexperienced. | Oppose | 20 |
 | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |