User:Clovermoss/Meta

Discussions that I have started or participated in

• Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 217#She" vs. "it" for ships
• User talk:Levivich/Archive 3#Growth team and User talk:Levivich/Archive 3#Reply tool – now-deleted discussions about broader project philosophy that are still present in the page history of User talk:Levivich if one wishes to read it.
• User:Clovermoss/Mobile editing/Talk page discussion
• Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 263#Accusing someone of being a sock in an RfA?
• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive344#Using the occupation parameter in an infobox to state that someone is a "cult leader"
• Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 174#We need to think outside the box... section 3
• That time I filed an ArbCom case request and the ANI thread that prompted it
• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive351#BLPs created by User:Davidcannon (un-archived)
• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1138#Did I do the right thing here? and Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 186#Language at WP:UPNOT
• Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 188#School districts and GEOLAND
• Wikipedia talk:Unreferenced BLP Rescue#7 years later...
• Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 267#Why don't people run at RfA?
• Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 268#Asking candidates about their religion at RfA
• Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review
• Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 192#How to describe past events on the main page – I admit to not really understanding the concept of historical present when I started this, but I still don't think my proposal was a bad idea
• That time I filed a clarification request at ArbCom
• Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 268#Feedback on the "new RFA process"
• Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)/Archive 7#Mobile fundraising experiment – Note that this experiment did not happen after negative community feedback
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Clover – I nominated the prematurely created article for deletion, which only had 1 source at the time. I submitted a draft through AfC once there were 3 SIGCOV reliable sources, which was accepted. I created it because I really didn't care either way contrary to the conclusion some folks came to at the previous AfD, I thought I met GNG at the time, and I didn't want someone to not try out of fear of upsetting me. It was in mainspace for about a month before it was nominated for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Clover (2nd nomination). I think every possible argument was presented in that AfD and I'm happy that it was such a nuanced discussion, because you don't always get so much explanation about where individuals draw on the lines on notability for more borderline articles. I will say that once someone noticed that one of the three sources was a student publication, I changed my own mind about the article meeting GNG. Another good thing to come out of this whole debacle was me making Wikipedia:Autobiography much more of a useful guide.
• Wikipedia talk:Responding to threats of harm#Why does it say "contact another admin"?
• Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Archive 20#Mooning the jury
• Wikipedia talk:Mobile communication bugs#Some observations
• Wikipedia talk:Administrator recall/Graham87#Clovermoss's concerns
• Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Shorten recall petition period
• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1171#Fastily and Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Fastily
• Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#NOINDEX AfDs on living people
• Wikipedia talk:Categorization#When to diffuse large categories?
• Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 269#We're getting kinda low
• Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#Unblock request wizard
• Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 71#AfDs on current event articles
• Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#Renaming indefinite blocks