Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
ClueBot II
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, unsupervised.
Programming Language(s): CBS (and: PHP, dependency of CBS. My classes in PHP, dependency of CBS. C, dependency of PHP.)
Function Summary: Removes the WikiProjects category from and adds {{inactive}} to the top of all pages in Category:WikiProjects whose main page or talk page haven't been edited in 60 days.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily.
Edit rate requested: maxlag = 2
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Source is here.
Discussion
In what way is this a desired operation? —gorgan_almighty 11:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- See the bot request for this functionality. -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 18:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
This looks good. Because the template is not very forceful, it just provides a little information to the idle user i see no problem. (But hey - i don't approve bots :P) :: maelgwn - talk 04:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
And what if the project page is a skeleton that does not need editing, while several pages it transcludes are edited quite often? MaxSem 06:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- The talk page should still be edited quite often. -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 06:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Presumably it could be excluded if it was a problem :: maelgwn - talk 06:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Will you be {{nobots}} compliant? — xaosflux Talk 18:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. (As stated on the bot's userpage.) -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 18:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't SatyrBot do the same thing? I don't think that there's a need for this....GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 20:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Does it? If so, it's not listed on the bot's user page, and it's not approved by the BAG. — madman bum and angel 04:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't SatyrBot do the same thing? I don't think that there's a need for this....GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 20:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. (As stated on the bot's userpage.) -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 18:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Will you be {{nobots}} compliant? — xaosflux Talk 18:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Presumably it could be excluded if it was a problem :: maelgwn - talk 06:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Approved for trial (50 edits or 7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Should cover it...Reedy Boy 23:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Approved. – all blocking issues have been corrected. — madman bum and angel 04:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.