User:Collect/ACE2017

2. Should the existence of a "case" imply that the committee should inevitably impose "sanctions"?

4. If an administrator has openly stated a strong aversion to an editor's article edits on that editor's talk page, is that sufficient to indicate that the administrator is no longer impartial concerning that editor?

6. a. In cases where the person involved in a case is actually out of the country during that case, ought there be a delay to give that editor sufficient time to address "new evidence"?
   b. Where multiple editors present evidence against such a person, ought space and time for rebuttal be given?
   c. Where evidence is added at the last minute, should the clock be stopped to allow actual time to rebut the last-minute evidence?
   d. Under what circumstance, if any, should arbitrators be allowed to present evidence in the proposed decision which was not previously presented by anyone else?

The grades assign equal weight to the first two, and double weight to the third. I am not making editorial comments about specific answers, and not making comments about candidates. Nor are the grades related to any other questions asked.