This is the user sandbox of Goodtiming8871. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.
Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!
Yoon Seok-yeol and former Defense Intelligence Command chief Noh Sang-won were reported to the National Police Agency's National Investigation Headquarters for their actions inducing North Korea to attack South Korea during the declaration of martial law. In other words, the act of allowing drones, which are offensive weapons, to invade North Korea's airspace and the contents of a note titled "Inducing North Korea to attack" were discovered as evidence. [3][4]
Resolving the treason
Woo Won-sik accepted the argument that it is realistically difficult to negotiate the contents of the constitutional amendment between the parties regarding the proposal to hold the presidential election and the constitutional amendment at the same time, and withdrew the existing proposal. [5] The Democratic Party leader suggested that solving the crime of treason is more important than the constitutional amendment.
[6] Yoon Seok-yeol seriously betrayed the trust of the people, and was impeached by the Constitutional Court. Yoon Seok-yeol was forced to focus on the criminal trial for treason.
[7]
The majority party leader of the National Assembly said,
Constitutional amendments are about developing democracy, but now we must prioritize dealing with the crime of rebellion and prevent the destruction of democracy [8]
The 2024 United States presidential election will be[a] the 60th quadrennial presidential election, set to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024.[2] Voters in each state and the District of Columbia will choose electors to the Electoral College, who will then elect a president and vice president for a term of four years.
The incumbent president, Joe Biden, a member of the Democratic Party, initially ran for re-election and became the party's presumptive nominee, facing little opposition.[3][4] However, Biden's performance in the presidential debate held in June 2024 intensified concerns about his age and health, and led to calls within his party for him to leave the race.[5] Although he was initially adamant he would remain in the race, Biden withdrew on July 21 and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, who became the party's nominee on August 5. Harris selected Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, as her running mate. Biden's withdrawal makes him the first eligible incumbent president since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968 not to run for re-election, and the first to withdraw after securing enough delegates to win the nomination.[6] Harris is the first nominee who did not participate in the primaries since Vice President Hubert Humphrey, also in 1968.[7]
Biden's predecessor, Donald Trump, a member of the Republican Party, is running for re-election for a second, non-consecutive term, after losing to Biden in 2020.[8] Other than Trump, only Nikki Haley, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under Trump and a former governor of South Carolina, received significant support during the Republican Party's primaries. Trump was nominated during the 2024 Republican National Convention along with his running mate, Ohio senator JD Vance. His campaign has been noted for making many false and misleading statements,[9][10][11] engaging in racist[12][13] anti-immigrant fearmongering,[b] and the promoting of conspiracy theories.[14][15] Trump has continued to repeat his false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him, which prompted the January 6 Capitol attack.[16] Trump's embrace of far-right extremism[15][14] and increasingly violent, dehumanizing, and authoritarian rhetoric[c] against his political opponents has been described by historians and scholars as populist, authoritarian, fascist,[d] unlike anything a political candidate has ever said in American history[17][18] and a continued breaking of political norms.[19] The Republican Party has made efforts to disrupt the 2024 presidential election as part of a larger election denial movement among American conservatives. In May 2024, Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, becoming the first former U.S. president to be convicted of a crime.[20] In 2023 and 2024, he was also found liable in civil proceedings for sexual abuse, defamation, and financial fraud. In July 2024, Trump survived an assassination attempt during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania.[21]
The presidential election will take place at the same time as elections for the U.S. Senate, House, gubernatorial, and state legislatures. Key swing states for the presidential election include Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[22] Leading campaign issues are abortion,[23][24][25] the economy,[26] healthcare,[27] education,[28] border security and immigration,[29][30] climate change,[31][32] democracy,[33][34] foreign policy,[35] and LGBTQ rights.[36] The winners are scheduled to be inaugurated on January 20, 2025, as the 47th president and 50th vice president of the United States.
============
To be updated - with more reliable sources
Trump has promised to form a panel of top experts cooperating with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to look into the causes of the upward trend in childhood diseases and chronic disease patients: autoimmune disorders, autism, obesity, and infertility. Kennedy has promised to reduce the chronic disease burden drastically if Trump returns to the White House and empowers him.[28]
Hello -Super Goku V; I think it's a good talk model for asking about Wikipedia's editing contribution that may be controversial.
I also ask for opinions before contributing to this topic. I hope to update this content after receiving opinions from users in the next 12 hours or so. AP News is attached as a reference, but the content actually mentioned by AP News is missing, so I hope to attach the part below after receiving opinions from other users.
(Current)
Republicans attributed Trump's low debate performance to their perception of biased debate moderation by ABC News, because the moderators fact-checked him more than four times but did not fact-check Harris.[29][30]
(Proposed edit)
AP News said that the ABC moderator was a bit too corrective to Trump in a polarized country, which caused a controversy over fairness. [31]
Republicans attributed Trump's low debate performance to their perception of biased debate moderation by ABC News, because the moderators fact-checked him more than four times but did not fact-check Harris.[30]
'35년간 끌어온 개헌', 우원식 의장은 성사시킬 수 있을까?['Constitutional amendment that has been dragged on for 35 years', can National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-sik make it happen?]. BBC KOREA ]] (in Korean). 6 April 2025. Retrieved 15 January 2025.
이재명 “개헌 필요하지만…지금은 내란종식이 먼저”[Lee Jae-myung: “Constitutional amendment is necessary…but ending the internal treason comes first”]. mk.co.kr news KOREA ]] (in Korean). 7 April 2025. Retrieved 7 April 2025.
”북 공격 유도'는 외환죄? 외환죄가 뭔지 따져보니 "["Inducing North Korea to attack" is a "crime of provoking a foreign country to incite war?" When we look into what the crime of provoking a foreign country to incite war is,..”]. BBC KOREA ]] (in Korean). 26 Dec 2024. Retrieved 10 April 2025.
”尹 탄핵선고>나규복 "내란·외환죄…尹 탄핵·처벌 이유 차고 넘쳐"["IYoon's impeachment > Na Gyu-bok "Crimes of internal rebellion and provoking a foreign country to incite war... Yoon's impeachment, reasons for punishment are overflowing.”]. jnilbo.com KOREA]] (in Korean). 3 April 2025. Retrieved 10 April 2025.
우의장, '대선·개헌 동시 투표' 제안 철회…"대선 후 본격 논의"[Woo withdraws the proposal for 'simultaneous voting on the presidential election and constitutional amendment'... "Full-scale discussion after the presidential election"]. JTBC news KOREA ]] (in Korean). 6 April 2025. Retrieved 9 April 2025.
이재명 “개헌 필요하지만…지금은 내란종식이 먼저”[Lee Jae-myung: “Constitutional amendment is necessary…but ending the internal treason comes first”]. mk.co.kr news KOREA ]] (in Korean). 7 April 2025. Retrieved 7 April 2025.
이재명 "개헌 필요하지만…지금은 내란종식이 먼저"[Lee Jae-myung "Constitutional amendment is necessary, but...now the end of rebellion comes first"]. The Chosun Ilbo KOREA (in Korean). 8 April 2025. Retrieved 8 April 2025.
이재명 "개헌 필요하지만…지금은 내란종식이 먼저"[Lee Jae-myung "Constitutional amendment is necessary, but...now the end of rebellion comes first"]. The Chosun Ilbo KOREA (in Korean). 8 April 2025. Retrieved 8 April 2025.
114 페이이지 윤석열 파면 결정문 전문, 윤석열 민주주의 부정[What was the content of the Constitutional Court's 114-page impeachment decision on Yoon Seok-yeol?]. ohmynews KOREA (in Korean). 4 April 2025. Retrieved 4 April 2025.
Gold, Michael (August 28, 2024). "Trump Reposts Crude Sexual Remark About Harris on Truth Social". The New York Times. ISSN0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 28, 2024. Retrieved August 28, 2024. Though he has a history of making crass insults about his opponents, the reposts signal Mr. Trump's willingness to continue to shatter longstanding norms of political speech.
removing non-constructive comments per [[WP:TALK/WP:CIVIL/ WP:DENY
===> True vandals and trolls (as distinguished from users who dabble in minor vandalism) usually suffer from chronic alienation and real or perceived powerlessness.
examples below. from 2024 election
Lol, no, of course not. Virtually every article on the election is camped 24/7 by Democratic Party apparatchiks. 66.172.108.127 (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Unless Medioatarban has a specific WP:POV concern, I think we should archive this section. Very curious that Medioatarban has only made 2 edits on Wikipedia. Maybe I have PTSD from last month, but I sincerely hope there isn’t any sock puppetry going on again.
SPA tagged. – 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, you wouldn't want anyone pointing out that this article is just an in-kind contribution to the Harris campaign. Man, you guys have zero shame. 66.172.108.127 (talk) 01:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
And just as Wikipedia users each edit for the specific topics, it is expected that the user above joined the Wikipedia to contribute to the fair editing of topics in the US presidential election...
three reverts rule
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period will usually also be considered edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions.
Summary
Limit of three reverts: An editor is allowed to revert single page no more than three times within a 24-hour period, regardless of whether the reverts involve the same or different material.
Definition of a revert: A revert is an edit or series of edits that undoes or manually reverses the changes made by other editors.
one reverts rule
The one-revert rule (1RR) is a guideline or policy often used in online communities, particularly those related to editing or contributing content, such as Wikipedia. It stipulates that a user is only allowed to make one reversion to a page within a specified timeframe, typically 24 hours. Reversion: This refers to the act of undoing or reversing changes made to a page by another user.
One revert: This means a user can only undo changes once within the specified timeframe.
24-hour period: The time limit during which the one-revert rule applies.
Summary
Limit of three reverts: An editor is allowed to revert single page no more than one time within a 24-hour period, regardless of whether the reverts involve the same or different material.
Definition of a revert: A revert is an edit or series of edits that undoes or manually reverses the changes made by other editors.
The summary of the meeting discusses the concept of neutrality in Wikipedia articles. It states that articles should fairly represent all significant viewpoints from reliable sources, but minority views should not be given undue weight. The example of the Earth article is used to illustrate this point, as it does not directly mention the flat Earth concept, a view held by a tiny minority
Fix typo and oOtto Warmbier
"Our [p]resident shouldn’t be squandering American influence on photo ops and exchanging love letters with a ruthless dictator."[1]
Peace Treaty on Korean Peninsula Editing 시에,
English Wikipedia Administrator 분들의 조언에 따라서, 일단 더이상 에디팅은 일단 이제 몰아서 하자 이유는 메인 아티클 이므로, 조심 스럽게 접근해서 하도록 합니다.
이유는
1) 기존에 English Wikipedia Main Article 로 승인을 받기 전 몇개월 동안은 Draft 상태이므로, 자유롭게 편집을 즉석하면서 실수를 여러번 고치면서, 해도 큰 상관이 없었다.
2) 그러나, Peace Treaty on Korean Peninsula가 이제 English Wikipedia Main Article 로 승인된 상태에서는, English Wikipedia는 수천명의 미국,영국,프랑스,일본,중국등 사용자들이 접속을 하므로, 해당 Article 를 함께 수정하는것이므로, 해당 Article를 즉석에서 Editing 을 하는것보다는, Wikipedia Administrator 권고하시는것처럼 다른곳에 copy edit 편집을 미리 하고 틀린것은 미리 수정을 하여, 가능한 수정이 최소화 되도록, 몰아서 편집을 하자.
3) 아래 생성 및 참여 하였던 Main Article 들처럼, 미국,영국,프랑스,일본,중국등 사용자들이 함께 참여를 할수 있게, Main Article 에서는 수정이 최소화 되도록 하자.
On August 29, the Atlantic reported on an interview with Moon Chung In who is the special envoy from South Korea. His understanding is that the diplomatic team of Mike Pompeo are having difficulties discussing with the defence team National Security Adviser John Bolton;
This divided stance between the US Diplomatic team and the US defense team may have played a significant role in the delay of the signing of the promised peace declaration. Diplomatic Team Secretary Mike Pompeo is strongly in favor of adhering to the agreement set out in the summit, whereas John Bolton insists that a complete denuclearization of the DPRK must be established first before a peace treaty can be formally imposed and thereby ending the Korean war.
Also on August 29, The Hill reported on the US verbal agreement with DPRK to end the Korean War, on both the June 1st meeting at the White House and during the Summit held in Singapore. However, soon after the Summit meeting, the US demanded denuclearization from North Korea before signing on the Peace Declaration document which eventually lead to an ever more hostile rhetoric from North Korea.
Questions about "End of Korean War/Peace Declaration" promise by the US
Moon Chung In, a special adviser to President Moon Jae In for foreign affairs and national security interviewed with the Atlantic and expressed his opinion about the current attention of U.S. The Trump administration is concerned about weakening its bargaining position by allowing prematurely to what some officials consider an “irreversible” end-of-war declaration, while the North Korean government believes it is America’s “turn to reciprocate” continuously. However, the Moon Jae In administration is now wishing for the event that during the UN General Assembly in late September in New York, it would be wonderful if President Trump, President Xi Jinping, President Moon Jae In, and Chairman Kim Jong-Un meet together at the United Nations [and] affirm the declaration to end the Korean War.[10]
Resolving the North Korea's nuclear and Military Challenge, there are several trials of agreement between the U.S. and North Korea in 1994 by Agreed Framework, 2005 and in 2007.
[11][12] USC Korean Studies Institute Director and Professor of International Relations, Mr Kang scrutinised the previous efforts to the Nuclear issues based on long years of history. The fundamental reason for the stalemate between the U.S. and North Korea's stance; the U.S. requested North Korea - “DPRK should disarm first; then we'll discuss security guarantees.” However, North Korea's position is - “we need the security guarantees from the United States first, then we will disarm.[13][14][15][16][17]
Moon Chung In, a special adviser to President Moon Jae In for foreign affairs and national security interviewed with the Atlantic and expressed his opinion about the current attention of U.S.
The Trump administration is concerned about weakening its bargaining position by allowing prematurely to what some officials consider an “irreversible” end-of-war declaration, while the North Korean government believes it is America’s “turn to reciprocate” continuously. However, the Moon Jae In administration is now wishing for the event that during the UN General Assembly in late September in New York, it would be wonderful if President Trump, President Xi Jinping, President Moon Jae In, and Chairman Kim Jong-Un meet together at the United Nations [and] affirm the declaration to end the Korean War.[10]
Resolving the North Korea's nuclear and Military Challenge, there are several trials of agreement between the U.S. and North Korea in 1994 by Agreed Framework, 2005 and in 2007.
[18][12] USC Korean Studies Institute Director and Professor of International Relations, Mr Kang scrutinised the previous efforts to the Nuclear issues based on long years of history. The fundamental reason for the stalemate between the U.S. and North Korea's stance; the U.S. requested North Korea - “DPRK should disarm first; then we'll discuss security guarantees.” However, North Korea's position is - “we need the security guarantees from the United States first, then we will disarm.[13][14][15][16][17]
원칙: 한국의 만일의 전쟁발생시
불과 30분안에 수도권 인구 절반인 1천만명이 사망하며,
이것을 막는것은 불가능하다는,
미국 국방부의 일급 기밀 시믈레이션을 언론에 보도한
스티브 베넌(Steve Bannon)의 자료에 근거하여, 향후 불필요한 전쟁 위험을 막고,
세계와 한반도 평화를 위해서,
올해 2018년 한반도 평화 협정 체결 위해서
도날드 트럼프 와 김정은 정상회담에 대한 수정원칙 ===
1. ( 한국 전쟁을 공식적으로 종료하려고하는) 도날드 트럼프 == 근거가 있는
실적이 되는 내용에 최대한 잘 정돈하여 내용을 기록합니다
2. 미국에서 향후에, 이것 북한과 함께 전쟁 종료를 해도 이것이 미국에 이익이겠구나 생각할수 있는 근거가 되는 내용에 대해서, 미국,영국,프랑스등 언론의 자료를 요약 하여 편집합니다
3. 중국과 러시아간에 친선이 있어서도 결국은 미국과 북한간의 전쟁은 향후 강대국간의 전쟁을 야기 한다는 사실에 대해서 근거를 갖고 정리
( Russia president 김정은 정상회담에 대해서 미기록 이유: 한반도 평화에 불필요한 내용이며, 불필요하게 트럼프 대통령 입지에도 불편하게 할수 있기 때문.)
영어 위키 피디아의 내용은, 수천명의 영어 위키 피디아를 사용하는 사용자들로부터 해당 근거가 신뢰 할수 있는 것이며 중립적이라는
것이 입증이 될때만 해당 내용이 수록될수 있으므로, 수시로 해당 근거가 되는 내용을 틈틈히 찾아 보도록함.
In December - ask Rollback: after using page reviewer right - 100 records
Please review Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request.
Applicants with fewer than 200 mainspace edits are unlikely to be granted this right.
More importantly, applicants must have a measurable track record of counter-vandalism and no recent history(the latest three months) of edit warring. The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.
2) RUSSIA
http://time.com/5309627/president-trump-why-war-games-end/ -- Russia
President Trump Is Ending 'War Games' in Korea. Here's What Russia and South Korea Think About That
By SIOBHAN MORRIN June 12, 2018
Russia: 'Devil in the detail'
Commemorative medal presented to Korean War 1950-1953 Veterans
Appropriate notification[edit]
Shortcut:
WP:APPNOTE
An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following:
The talk page or noticeboard of one or more WikiProjects or other Wikipedia collaborations which may have interest in the topic under discussion.
A central location (such as the Village pump or other relevant noticeboards) for discussions that have a wider impact such as policy or guideline discussions.
The talk page of one or more directly related articles.
On the talk pages of a user mentioned in the discussion (particularly if the discussion concerns complaints about user behavior).
On the user talk pages of concerned editors. Examples include:
Editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article
Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics)
Editors known for expertise in the field
Editors who have asked to be kept informed
The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions—for example, if notices are sent to editors who previously supported deleting an article, then identical notices should be sent to those who supported keeping it. Do not send notices to too many users, and do not send messages to users who have asked not to receive them.
Notifications must be polite, neutrally worded with a neutral title, clear in presentation, and brief—the user can always find out more by clicking on the link to the discussion. Do not use a bot to send messages to multiple pages. The ==Discussion at ==
You are invited to join the discussion at . User:Goodtiming8871 (talk) 16:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC) template may help in notifying people in a quick, simple, and neutral manner.
Note: It is good practice to leave a note at the discussion itself about notifications which have been made, particularly if made to individual users
[23]
China requested US a diplomatic solution about cessation to the missile program of North Korea, and declared to join North Korea Forces if U.S launches pre-emptive strike to North Korea.
Russia has deployed heavy military equipment towards its border with North Korea amid mounting fears of a military clash between Pyongyang and the United States.
ToThAc moved page User:Goodtiming8871/Inter-Korean House of freedom' to Draft:Inter-Korean House of freedom: Preferred location for AfC submissions) (undo | thank)
The casualties of the Korean War are back on U.S. soil following an emotional ceremony in Hawaii.The DoDLab has begun the painstaking process of identifying what are believed to be the remains of U.S. servicemen killed during the Korean War 1950-53.
The casualties of the Korean War are back on U.S. soil following an emotional ceremony in Hawaii.The DoDLab has begun the painstaking process of identifying what are believed to be the remains of U.S. servicemen killed during the Korean War 1950-53.
The casualties of the Korean War are back on U.S. soil following an emotional ceremony in Hawaii.The DoDLab has begun the painstaking process of identifying what are believed to be the remains of U.S. servicemen killed during the Korean War 1950-53.
The casualties of the Korean War are back on U.S. soil following an emotional ceremony in Hawaii.The DoDLab has begun the painstaking process of identifying what are believed to be the remains of U.S. servicemen killed during the Korean War 1950-53.
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
