User:JaGa/Toolbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
- ~2026-83416-2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) persistent, unexplained removal of content with references (unresponsive, already warned twice). GenoV84 (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- EliasMKhouri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) persistent, deliberate removal of content with references through unexplained edits and misleading edit summaries (already warned twice). GenoV84 (talk) 02:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-15026-25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. On article Polokwane -- ozmoozmo@enwiki (u:uh:t:th:c:s) 05:54, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Velvet'sRevenge01 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jessicathequeenlovelyhopes (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- HonourableCrowscock (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- IloveLithuaniaAndIFactCheckMisinformation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Kyra1234!91546155Felixlove (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jigaboo!Ghost (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "jigg?aboo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Mater Christi College (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Hakstolsux (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "sux" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- Japhyrobot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 05:30, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see this as misleading. Ending a username in "robot" isn't the same as ending in just "bot". Maybe ask the user for an explanation and consider changing the username? The user has been constructive so far. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:48, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user, since they have edited constructively. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Talk:Benjamin Netanyahu
Temporary semi-protection: WP:PIA; middle ground between XC and no protection, currently has very little to no constructive additions from non-confirmed accounts. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 14:29, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Brady Tkachuk
Reason: Edit-warring, BLP violations and possible sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by User:At0068308. Borgenland (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Matt Boldy
Reason: Edit-warring, BLP violations and possible sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by User:At0068308. Borgenland (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Clayton Keller
Reason: Edit-warring, BLP violations and possible sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by User:At0068308. Borgenland (talk) 15:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Calvin Robinson
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruption/edit warring by both registered and temp accounts, likely linked to the same user. ~. Pbritti (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 04:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Justin Fields
Reason: Page has been edited multiple times based on expected trade announced today (March 16, 2026). Trade has not been confirmed or announced by either participating team (Kansas City Chiefs or New York Jets) Diddykong1130 (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Not done Appears to have now been confirmed. The Bushranger One ping only 00:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- The references used (including ESPN, New York Post, and CBS Sports) are sports news outlets but are not officially tied to either team involved or the NFL itself. Given the fact the trade has not been posted to the NFL's transaction log under Trades (https://www.nfl.com/transactions/) or officially announced by either the Jets (via https://www.newyorkjets.com/) or Chiefs (https://www.chiefs.com/) would mean that trade has not yet been finalized. Diddykong1130 (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- So they're secondary sources? Which, on Wikipedia, are preferred over primary sources. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Seems to contradict Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports/Handling sports transactions which shows examples of initial reports from secondary sources of trades not always being reliable. Diddykong1130 (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- So they're secondary sources? Which, on Wikipedia, are preferred over primary sources. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- The references used (including ESPN, New York Post, and CBS Sports) are sports news outlets but are not officially tied to either team involved or the NFL itself. Given the fact the trade has not been posted to the NFL's transaction log under Trades (https://www.nfl.com/transactions/) or officially announced by either the Jets (via https://www.newyorkjets.com/) or Chiefs (https://www.chiefs.com/) would mean that trade has not yet been finalized. Diddykong1130 (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
La casa de los famosos season 6
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits by temporary accounts. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Arabic numerals
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. M.Bitton (talk) 19:36, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Matcha
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. (3 times in the last two weeks.) Vampyricon (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Miss Universe 2026
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users continue to add unsourced information. Sciencefish (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Yuan Yang
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring on the article page. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:29, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Note that none of this has been vandalism. The Bushranger One ping only 05:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Large language models
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Somewhat recently created that is now linked from multiple maintenance templates and related administrative pages resulting in quite a bit of traffic and vandalism for as essay. Minimum protection to save on some time. Moxy🍁 23:19, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Already protected. It's semi-protected. ECP is not warranted at this time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Category:English profanity
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Painting17 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
List of wars by death toll
Reason: High level of IP vandalism PineapplePomeranian (talk) 02:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Bushranger One ping only 04:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
World War I casualties
Reason: High level of IP vandalism PineapplePomeranian (talk) 02:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Irrumatio
Reason: High level of IP vandalism PineapplePomeranian (talk) 02:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Bushranger One ping only 04:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
User:Dmitry Dzhagarov
Indefinite full protection: Deceased Wikipedian per WP:DWGU; see https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=62234107. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 04:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Plus alt User:Дмитрий Дж. . GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 04:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- both Fully protected The Bushranger One ping only 04:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- both
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
2026 Iran war
In the infobox, change:
to
The explanatory note only includes the sinking of IRIS Dena, which was near the totality of naval losses a week ago but the claimed losses have now substantially expanded. This would also bring the treatment of naval losses much more in line with aviation losses.
An alternate (in my opinion uglier) option would be:
- 104 sailors killed, 32 injured off the coast of Sri Lanka.[2]
References
- "Iranian army says at least 104 killed in US attack on Iranian warship last week". Reuters. 8 March 2026.
Greenland crisis
(I posted this a few days ago in the Talk page also)
The sentence "This escalated in early 2026 after Trump refused to rule out the use of military force to annex Greenland and threatened a 25% import tax on European Union (EU) goods unless Denmark ceded Greenland." in the first para of the lead, should be changed to something like " ... threatened 10% import tax, increasing to 25% over several weeks on goods from several European nations unless they supported the cessation of Greenland to the US. " OR " ... threatened a 25% import tax on goods from several European nations unless they supported the cessation of Greenland to the US. "
The difference is the following:
It was not just EU countries, it was a specific set of eight countries to my understanding, including Norway and the UK which are not a part of the EU. The fact that it would start at 10 and raise to 25% is perhaps important also, although much less so than the first point. It was not "unless greenland was ceded to the US" it was "unless those countries supported his bid to acquire greenland". This is also a big difference and therefore quite important.
Sources: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-vows-tariffs-eight-european-nations-over-greenland-2026-01-17/ (this one provides the most clear explanation of point 1)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/17/trump-tariff-european-countries-greenland
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/trump-pauses-greenland-tariffs-rcna255270 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g5345ylk0o Chattenoir (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- Not done. Talk:Greenland crisis is not protected, you have already started a discussion there, so there is no need to start it in two places. You would propose a change here only if you cannot edit the talk page due to protection.
- You can preface your discussion with the tag {{Edit extended-protected}} to cause your proposal to appear on a category page monitored by some editors. Be sure to back up your proposal with the sources you list above. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Nigger in the fence
Create this redirect to the page "Nigger in the woodpile" with the categories: "R syn" and "R pw". Thanks. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 14:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Done. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:30, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
2026 Minab school attack
Change "Minab girls' elementary school" to "Minab elementary school" in beginning of background section
The building was both a boy's and girl's school ohttps://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/03/usa-iran-those-responsible-for-deadly-and-unlawful-us-strike-on-school-that-killed-over-100-children-must-be-held-accountable/n different floors. 66 boys died, 54 girls according to Amnesty International. OverconfidentFox (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
2026 Iran war#Casualties by country
France | Killed 1 | Injured 6 (not "Several") References: 1. https://www.france24.com/fr/info-en-continu/20260313-premier-mort-et-six-blessés-dans-l-armée- française-dans-la-guerre-au-moyen-orient 2. https://information.tv5monde.com/france/premier-mort-et-six-blesses-dans-larmee-francaise-dans-la-guerre-au-moyen-orient-2813408 3. https://www.ladepeche.fr/2026/03/12/guerre-au-moyen-orient-six-soldats-francais-blesses-par-une-attaque-de-drones-en-irak-13269469.php Savukynas (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
2026 Iran war
Under hostilities, third week:
"Also Israel announced that they will launch a ground invasion of Lebanon, expecting to do a complete occupation of Southern Lebanon and disarticulate key bases of Hezbollah.[399][400] Due to fears of prolonged occupation of Lebanese territory, Western Great powers (Canada, UK, Germany, Italy and France) stated warnings to Israel against such militar moves"
You can see a number of grammatical and spelling errors, as well as some more unusual ones (disarticulate???) If someone could fix these I'd be really grateful Rivulet Ruffles (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Update: Someone got it while i was writing this, so it's all good Rivulet Ruffles (talk) 05:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Done already (added this tag for the archiver bot). ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:32, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
AutopatrolledUser:Umais Bin Sajjad
I have created over 150 mainspace articles (primarily in the area of Film and TV). While some of my earlier creations were deleted, the majority of my recent articles remain live, and I have refined my sourcing and notability assessment standards over time. I am familiar with WP:N, WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS and I ensure that all new articles meet notability and sourcing standards prior to creation. As I continue to create new articles...I believe autopatrolled would help reduce workload for NPP, as my pages generally require minimal follow-up. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC) User:TinaLees-Jones
User has created over 900 live articles, mainly all relating to Asian people and places. None of the articles I've randomly spot checked have any major issues that would prevent them from passing muster in NPP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC) User:AjayDas
I mainly create articles related to Assam. Currently, I have around 100 live articles on Wikipedia. Auto-patrol rights would be helpful if you consider. Please let me know if there's any way to improve my contribution if it's rejected. AjayDas (talk) 06:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC) User:Moondragon21
Editor has created almost 10,000 articles in mainspace (I was wondering why xtools was taking so long to load), 99.6% of which are live. I've spot checked a dozen or so of their recent articles and all seems to be in order. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:53, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowserUser:Dog Oxide
I want to automatically update outdated parameters in all pages with a certain infobox, and I believe AutoWikiBrowser might be a good option for this. DoO2 04:53, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
User:ThaesOfereode
I'd like access to AWB to take care of typos and MOS errors I'm constantly coming across in one fell swoop, usually MOS:'S, MOS:LQ, MOS:LANG, MOS:SINGLE, and the various case uses of MOS:DASH. Any automation that can be added to these kind of clockwork edits would be helpful. I still plan on doing mostly manual edits bc I'm more engaged with expansion than cleanup. But I think I go through enough ebbing and flowing in the clockwork edits department to justify AWB'ing. ThaesOfereode (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
ConfirmedUser:Royal Turquoise
I would like to create some lancelet related articles which I am unable to due to my newness of my account so I am requesting this right. Royal Turquoise (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmedUser:RAPTOR7762-2
I would like to register this alternative account, for extended-confirmed. (User:RAPTOR7762 is my main account) My use for this is when accessing Wikipedia through a public computer, connecting to an unsecured network, or other scenarios when there's a risk of the main account being compromised. See WP:PUBSOCK for more information. I also would like to use this just in case my main account gets compromised, or if I forget my password and I am unable to recover it. RAPTOR7762-2 (talk) 04:35, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewerUser:FantasticWikiUser
Requesting a trial run only unless you think I clearly meet the criteria. I want to see if this is something I enjoy, especially because there is such a large backlog on it. I often vote on AfDs which has a good track record, although my nominations often haven't done so well. I also occasionally assess articles. FantasticWikiUser(Ts and Cs) 15:39, 8 March 2026 (UTC) User:Sarge Graham
Hello, I have been revising newly created articles for some time now, and I would like to contribute more to the project by patrolling articles as well. Sarge Graham (talk) 09:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC) User:Minnastronomer
In my time as a wikipedia editor I have created over 100 articles and have over 2500 edits. I have the time, ability, experience, and want to help clean out the backlog, especially on topics I have been active in. Minnastronomer (talk) 08:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC) User:Endrabcwizart
I would like to kindly request the reactivation of my New Page Reviewer access. My permission expired on March 1, 2026. Thanks Endrabcwizart (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
User:Boynamedsue
I made an article the other day and saw it hadn't yet been reviewed. When I looked into the review process to find out why, I realised that there was a big backlog and I could probably help out. So here I am. I've been a user for a long time and have contributed to AfD (though somewhat sporadically) and written quite a few new articles of decent quality. I contribute a lot at the reliable source noticeboard and have a very strong grasp of sourcing and WP:GNG. My one weakness that I am aware of is that I've never created a draft, so I would probably need help with that. There will likely be some other technical questions I'm not yet aware of, but I pick stuff up quickly. Boynamedsue (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC) User:Phlogiston Enthusiast
Hello. I'm Phlogiston Enthusiast. I have ~1350 edits total, and many more than 500 main space edits. I have created many pages, and am familiar with the policy on page creation, as well as translated a page into English, so I would be familiar with this too. I'm looking for something new to try, and I'd like to try this. I have at least 90 Days of experience as well. I have experience patrolling recent changes and pending changes. I usually edit using TOR browser, in case that effects anything. The last request I made too early because I was incorrect about the amount of time my account had existed. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
User:Kaptain Kebab Heart
I want to help to clear the backlog. Kaptain Kebab Heart (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2026 (UTC) User:Namita Tudu
Hello, I would like to request the New Page Reviewer right. I am an active contributor and familiar with Wikipedia’s basic policies and would like to help patrol new pages. Thank you. Namita Tudu (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2026 (UTC) User:PolishHamster
Requesting trial run because I want to try something different from Anti-Vandalism. I am currently active at AfD. I am willing to patrol new pages in a responsible manner. I have a good memory of Wikipedia guidelines too. I've made a few sloppy articles and drafts, but I now understand the wrong turns I took. ~~PolishHamsteryeah 00:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewerUser:Cadddr
I'm a recent changes patroller. I've read the policy on vandalism, the basic content policies, the basic legal policy, and the guideline on reviewing. As of recently, I have rollback rights. Cadddr (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
User:Sadko
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
RollbackUser:Phlogiston Enthusiast
Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand. Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
User:Theeverywhereperson
I would like to renew my rollback rights, because I have been using AntiVandal constructively, and the same other reasons as my most recent request. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
User:EditorShane3456
I am currently dealing with a TA (and might encounter many more vandals) so I would like to have this right to easily snap their edits to valhalla. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC) User:Referentis
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editorUser:CharlesEditor23
I am once again requesting the template editor right. I have met the guidelines for granting, especially number 4, which is that I have had no behavioral blocks or WP:3RR violations for a minimum of six (6) months or more. The main reason why I am requesting the template editor right again is so that I may be able to make productive, meaningful contributions to protected templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data that are in line with established WP:CONSENSUS with many other editors. I believe that if granted the template editor right again, I can demonstrate that I will avoid the first criteria for revocation, which is performing obviously controversial edits without first determining WP:CONSENSUS. I will also demonstrate that I will only use wise & prudent template editing and test my changes in the sandboxes first. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewerUser:Cadddr
I'm a recent changes patroller (and as of recently, a rollbacker). Recently, at Anabel Ternès, multiple temporary accounts were repeatedly making the same WP:BLP violation. Most likely, it was the same person, but I don't want to assume that without a little more evidence. I suspect I'll occasionally come across similar situations while dealing with vandalism and other policy violations. Cadddr (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC) User:MolecularPilot
Hi! I'm heavily involved in vandalism / recent changes patrol, AfC, and am an NPP patroller, which would all benefit from having this permission (and there's been a few cases recently where it would have been useful to me). I meet the 6 months / 300 edits requirement, and agree to follow all guidelines. MolecularPilotTalk 10:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC) User:Schazjmd
When en-Wikipedia switched to temporary accounts, I chose not to request this permission because I wanted to see if I could continue to effectively deal with vandalism, spam, and unconstructive edits without the IP information. I've given it some time and I've noticed that I'm doing less follow-up, perhaps because the TAs are changing. I'd like to request this permission now so I can see whether the additional information that it provides helps me identify additional problematic edits. I have read and will comply with the guidelines. |