User:Jengod

Wikipedia editor from California From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PATRIARCHY NAMES: This seems regressive on first glance but I believe it's important to add married names and diminutive titles such as Mrs. Elisha Foote and Miss Stebbins as redirects and as Wikidata aliases for women like Eunice Newton Foote and Fannie Stebbins. In their own time and sometimes in their own writing, these women were often known by what we would now consider patriarchial honorifics. Ignoring those names erases a necessary link in the historical record and/or breaks the network were trying to build here. The important thing is to make these women findable, by any names necessary. That being said, I find née an archaic affectation with mildly misogynistic or double-standard-y connotations. How about instead of Estelle Ishigo (née Peck) we consider Estelle Ishigo, born Estelle Peck? Everyone deserves to be recognized as a full person from birth, under whatever name they claim, not just a parcel to be trundled between custodians and rebranded based on current ownership.

AI-suspicious American history articles:

  • every sentence is sourced to a different source
  • uniform sentence length and tone
  • title case subheds
  • LLM is easily confounded by undisambiguated identities!
  • no incoming links
  • no see alsos
  • "vibe" is bored 8th grader with no background knowledge or interest
  • bare URLs (PDFs) unformatted
  • redlinked categories
  • the usual social engineering cues

Category:Articles lacking sources from June 2015

watershed biota

click here. (you're welcome)

Nothing about motherhood made me more conservative. The more babies and burden, the more I know we need to go forth in beauty and cooperation and foolish foolhardy affection for the world

Name
jengod
CurrentlocationCalifornia
Languagesen-us
Quick facts Name, Country ...
Jengod
 Wikipedian  
Name
jengod
Country United States
Current locationCalifornia
Languagesen-us
Time zonePST
Current timeCurrent time for UTC-8 is 14:15
Account statistics
JoinedMay 23, 2003
Extended confirmedy
Autopatrolledn*
Administratorex*
Editing practices
StyleExopedianist
Encyclopedic scopeInclusionist
DeviceSafari for iPhone
Edit modeMobile-only
Redlinksy
SubjectsHistory, nature, literature, visual art, women
GnomeworkInterlanguage, short descriptions, thumbnail photos, categories
Projectsenwiki, Commons, Data
Close
Wikimedians of Los Angeles member
Jengod
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning July 27, 2025
Jengod has made 150K+ edits since 2003 via iphone. Almost all of her edits (81.7%) are in mainspace. Article creations and improvements are her forte. It would be fair to assume she had received the Editor of the Week honor many years ago since her valuable contributions have always been appreciated for more than two decades. A cherished veteran to all that know her.
Recognized for
interest in History, nature, literature, visual art, women
Notable work
Andrew Jackson and the slave trade in the United States
Submit a nomination

"I'm no woman at all. I'm a red-shouldered hawk, cursed to live in human form." #witchproblems #ilovebrooms

Hello, nice to meet you. You can call me Jen. I'm a wife and SAHM of four who writes encyclopedia articles on the Safari browser for iPhone 17 while folding laundry and waiting to pick up the kids from school, etc. One of these days I would like to become a working mom again, because money, but for the time being I'm mostly here with the goal of making new start-class to B-class quality articles on topics of low importance in my areas of interest (history, nature, books, women).

Typefaces I appreciate include Bembo, and Caslon, with honorable mention to Albertus for being in 1960s Faber & Faber books, thanks for asking.


Jump to articles created or substantially expanded 2026 to see what I've been doing lately. Jump to additional images section to see bug photos uploaded to Commons.

User:Jengod/New and in development

User:Jengod/Tools

User:Jengod/Sandboxen and to-do lists

User:Jengod/Template and style bookmarks

User:Jengod/Research and reference bookmarks

Old lady shakes fist at cloud

User:Jengod/Notable quotables

It's our folk encyclopedia we can do what we want.

PURELY SUBTRACTIVE EDITORS ARE THE BANE OF THIS COMMUNITY

But on the other hand: "You don't have a slug problem, you have a duck deficiency." —Bill Mollison et al.

I think Kevin Durant is just neat

Original research, baby (outside the walls!)

Sometimes I don't add {{use mdy dates}} as a protest against illogical American date formatting. When creating articles where it's marginally necessary, my preferred rendering is {{use mdy dates|date=December 2025|cs1-dates=ly}} which formats the main "created" date in our romantic regional style but all the viewed and archived dates are presented in a satisfying and logical robot-friendly format.

Our critics consider Wikipedia inaccurate rubbish, but they know not of how meticulously oiled the project is, and how much work goes into constantly expanding it. The vandal-hunters, stub-writers, dyk'ers, article-writers, copyeditors, image buffs, experts, administrators, bureaucrats, and legal buffs all have a place here, and when they work together the machinery powering this massive projects runs uninterrupted. When this spectrum comes together, the fabric works in harmony and Wikipedians churns out information at a rate faster then anything else in the world.

I recently had the wonderful experience of creating a two-sentence stub on a molecule. I encountered this molecule while collecting sources for articles about an American dramedy TV show. It would be hard to emphasize how little knowledge I have about chemistry or chemicals. It was incredible to see what unfolded after I published.

  • Apparently what normals would see as the letter P is actually p- which is a secret code related to the architecture of the atoms? And chemical names do not use 1 and one interchangeably? So kindly editor User:Graeme Bartlett moved the article to the correct spot.
  • Same kindly editor added a "chembox" that structured all known data about said molecule into a machine-and-human friendly format; this comes with a picture of said molecule that apparently already existed on Wikidata!
  • Shoutout to Wikimedia Commons Commons:user:NadirSH for adding this molecular structure image back in 2023. You rock!
  • Graham then added two categories that only someone who is able to "read" chemistry would know about: Category:Cyclic ketones and Category:Cyclohexanes. I am reminded of the xkcd comic on "average familiarity."
  • Next came User:Reba16, who added another name format and another rendering of the molecular structure to the chembox, refined the stub tag, and specified the image size.
  • Last but not least, User:Randomologist2000 revised the text to specify that it was an organosulfur compound (OK, sure) and put the chemical formula inline within the body of the wee stub article.

Amazing! Incredible! Seriously, gratitude to all for pitching in and helping make this little guy a less-embarrassing and ham-handed imposter of an encyclopedia article. I love this place and I love you guys. Now get back to work! ~~~~

Leisure reading

WIKIPEDIA MAGAZINES YOU MIGHT ENJOY:

Ach Gott blick in die schöne Natur und beruhige Dein Gemüth über das müssende—die Lieb fordert alles und ganz mit recht, so ist es mir mit Dir, Dir mit mir—nur vergißt Du so leicht, daß ich für mich und für Dich leben muß, wären wir ganz vereinigt, Du würdest dieses schmerzliche eben so wenig wie ich empfinden - O God look into beautiful nature and calm your mind about that which must be—love demands everything and rightfully so, so it is for me with you, for you with me—only you forget so easily that I have to live for me and for you, were we wholly united, you would feel the pain (of it) as little as I

Beethoven's "Immortal Beloved" letter

Translated articles

Work: Articles created or substantially expanded 2026

my human form
American soda brands
It has been an honor to serve with you gentlemen
I took this photo. In retrospect it is my most important contribution to Wikimedia Commons. I wish I'd put more effort into the lighting etc.! Caption on breastfeeding: Formula and pumped breastmilk side by side. Note that the formula is of uniform consistency and color, while the expressed breast milk exhibits properties of an organic solution by separating into a layer of fat at the top (the "creamline"), followed by the milk, and then a watery blue-colored layer at the bottom.
Mosaic fountain, Getty Villa
"Negro boys on Easter morning. Southside, Chicago, Illinois" (Russell Lee, Farm Security Administration)
Tustennuggee Emathla or Jim Boy, a Creek chief
Cession of Indian Lands 1816–1830
I live in Cession 286; HUC HUC 1807001

Bold means that I think I did a good job or more likely that I just had a grand old time researching this topic.

✅ = done and patrolled

🌱 = stub, placeholder

➡️ = previously existed as a redirect

⬆️ = major expansion from draft or existing article

❓ = not yet patrolled/reviewed

👎 = dissatisfying placeholder

Order within categories is usually (but not always) chronologically newest to oldest.

Of late I do a lot of settler-colonizer studies, and trying to figure out where American slaves were held and by whomst

I would have liked to say that I was able to resurrect the voices of those who had been enslaved. But writing a historical narrative about the enslaved is complicated because there are multiple layers of silences. There is the fundamental silencing of Indigenous voices in the colonial archives, which privilege those of European officials. And many of the available epic poems or oral histories that have been passed from generation to generation often tell the stories of society's elites—the kings, nobles, warriors, and important religious leaders. Women rarely feature, and the enslaved almost never; they are muted, and the distance of a century reveals only flickering, spectral forms. How do we tell the stories of people that history forgets and the present avoids? I have tried here to uncover a handful of stories about a handful of people. I wish I could have done more.

Slaves for Peanuts: A Story of Conquest, Liberation, and a Crop That Changed History by Jori Lewis (2022)

It has been many years since I read what purported to be Weatherford's speech when he surrendered to Gen. Jackson; but if I recollect right, he was made to say that he would whip the Georgians on one side of the river and make his corn on the other. That was all a lie, and for effect. It reminds me of the report that the Kentuckians ingloriously fled. It is true, a few Kentuckians had arrived in the neighborhood of New Orleans, when the British made their attack. The Kentuckians were without arms—what could they do? All that can be said is, that it is easier to find a fighting man than a magnanimous one.

Despite the efforts to celebrate Jackson as a hero to all—as a mythical figure on par with George Washington—even his most devoted eulogists struggled.

Mourning the Presidents (2023)[1]

The Mississippi is to [Americans in the West] everything. It is the Hudson, the Delaware, the Potomac and all the navigable rivers of the Atlantic States formed into one stream.

James Madison, 1802

Some articles I'm proud to have helped shape

I took it out of the article bc original research and speculation but I'm 90 percent sure what happened to Joe Martin is that imperialist racist alcoholic huckster fraud Frank Buck bought him from the Depression-hit Al Barnes Zoo and cast him as the captured orangutan in his breakout Bring 'Em Back Alive (film), and exhibited him at Frank Buck's Jungle Camp the second summer of the Chicago World's Fair. Joe Martin most likely died of a stroke at Buck's Long Island zoo the winter of 1935. Remind me to write this up for a film history journal one of these days; I still have all the cites in a document somewhere


Additional images

COI/paid-editing declarations

Back in the day I worked at E! Online/Style and added a reference to an eonline story about the death of Michael Jackson, and created a handful of stubs like Isaac. After I retired (LOL) to having kids, as a favor to a friend, I added a bunch of citations to articles at some website she worked at but I honestly can't recall the website name and I don't care to look it up and revisit my shame, and I believe all of those were all reverted in short order. (sorry to whichever editor had to deal with that nonsense.) In 2018 I created the article mg (magazine) as a favor for a friend who had an online publicity gig and I told her I didn't want to be paid but she nonetheless sent me a $20 Starbucks gift card in thanks which I definitely used to buy coffee. I regret it all. I also did plenty of the usual "edit your alma mater" stuff at the beginning, and have contributed photos of places that I frequent in my home region, etc. If there is anything I have neglected to mention it's just because I have a Swiss-cheese brain but I will add it here when I rediscover it or am otherwise reminded of it. I think I've been clean since 2018 and I plan to remain so.

My dad wants to contribute to wikipedia sometimes but has found the climate unwelcoming so sometimes he sends me text w cites or images and tells me where to add them and I do; such edits are summarized as such in edit summary. My FIL has written a lot of books that are cited on Wikipedia (which I know bc he told me), but I haven't ever messed with any of those pages or cites, to my knowledge. Another relative was killed in an act of terrorism but I have not engaged with the article other than reading it (or possibly typo fixes but I don't know how to check for sure). One of my kids has started making minor edits so I think we share an IP address when I'm not logged in. My husband is now on here very occasionally. Not sure if I want to link dad and husband accounts from here but just FYI.

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI