User:TinaLees-Jones

• TinaLees-Jones (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User has created over 900 live articles, mainly all relating to Asian people and places. None of the articles I've randomly spot checked have any major issues that would prevent them from passing muster in NPP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike You might be more of a domain-knowledge expert on Chinese topics and be better positioned to evaluate this request (I don't see any obvious problems tbh). Sohom (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Sohom Datta Last time they requested this right I found worrying source-text integrity issues . I'd have to take another look to see if that has improved. I have no concerns about the notability of their creations. Toadspike [Talk] 07:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Veggiegalaxy

• Veggiegalaxy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I'm hoping to be considered for autopatrolled. I've created 77 live mainspace articles spanning biographies, film, NYC landmarks,and internet culture. My articles are well sourced and I consistently adhere to WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, etc. I'm also responsive - if one of my articles needs something, I'm responsive! I try to take care to go through the AfC process if I'm uncertain about notablility or something about my article.

I've also been getting more involved in other areas of Wikipedia — I review AfC submissions and participate in AfD discussions, both of which have made me a more careful article creator.

My one mainspace deletion was a lesson well learned — it taught me a lot about WP:NOTNEWS and has shaped how I evaluate topics going forward. I'd love to help reduce the review backlog! Veggiegalaxy (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Lanceloth345

• Lanceloth345 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As long as i have been actively contributing to Wikipedia, particularly on biographical, artistic and geographical articles mostly about Albania, i would be honored to be considered for autopatrolled status, to continue contributing further to various projects. Thank you in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Note this previous request in July 2025. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC) (Edited. —TS)

User:RabidTuberculosis

• RabidTuberculosis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello friends! I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia by creating articles related to aerospace engineering, spaceflight missions, and the biographies of notable scientists and engineers. I've created more than 80 articles and gained an intimate understanding of WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS in the process. My guiding principles are humility, curiosity, and empathy, and I try to respond to feedback quickly and optimistically. I look forward to contributing much more and would be honored to spare patrollers and reviewers additional work. Please feel free to ask any questions about my expertise, areas of interest, or past work! RabidTuberculosis (talk) 23:24, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done

• There is some close paraphrasing/copyvio in Eugene Tu (see copyvio report). Also, why is Tu notable? Please remove the copyright violation and then request revdel.
• Why did you think J. Michael McCarthy was notable? Can you explain where you found his alleged date of birth?
• The citations in Bernardino Ciaffoni do not refer to particular pages in the sources.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Voorts, just checking that a lack of page number did not contribute to the decline here, and it was just a recommendation? For shorter sources, this is not even needed at FAC. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:24, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

A recommendation. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:29, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Dog Oxide

• Dog Oxide (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to automatically update outdated parameters in all pages with a certain infobox, and I believe AutoWikiBrowser might be a good option for this. DoO2 04:53, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Dog Oxide Is this about Template_talk:Infobox_building#Deprecating_parameters? If so it would be a nice courtesy to talk to Zackmann08 who seems to actively be working on it. Trialpears (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, that IS what I was going to use it for. DoO2 15:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Adam Harangozó (LSE WiR)

• Adam Harangozó (LSE WiR) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:NDNT

• NDNT (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights , I am requesting this rights because I am an event organizer . NDNT (talk) 08:54, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done. This is very rarely granted ahead of the usual automatic granting criteria. I think you may have intended to request event coordinator instead of extended confirmed? If so, you should request on the correct page. stwalkerster (talk) 11:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Stwalkerster,

sorry for that, thank you,

let me do it. NDNT (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Falcão Alado

• Falcão Alado (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I'm an autopatrolled user in ptwiki, and we're running some tests to change the URC rules locally (me and other sysops). I need the extendedconfirmed status here, beacause we are trying to leverage the existing code from the English project, and I need to have the rights to upload files without barrers. I do not pretend to upload any file locally, just want to run some tests to see the File Upload Wizard working. If there's any questions, you shall see my user sandbox in ptwiki. Thanks. Falcão Alado (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

What is URC? Is there a reason you can't use the test wiki for this? voorts (talk/contributions) 19:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Ey. URC is the portuguese for the English WP:NFC. We call that "Ultra Restricted Content". The main reason that I'm asking the role is because I don't know exactely how the wizard works here. I'm unable even to see what's next after clicking "upload a non-free file". It's just to be able to view all the boxes and questions in a script which is really working before going to the Test Wiki with a working .js, that I already have for my test page, cause' I do not pretend to upload any file. Falcão Alado (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't think this is really a sufficient reason to grant extended confirmed, but I'll keep this open so a more technically-minded admin can tell you how to test this without extended confirmed here. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 20:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@Chaotic Enby can you help with this? voorts (talk/contributions) 20:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

From what I understand, you could request interface administrator on test.wiki (this seems like a good enough reason for it) and do your tests there, uploading free or even blank files for testing if needed. I've done a similar thing when working on the Unblock Wizard. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:45, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:NDNT

• NDNT (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting event coordinator rights, I am requesting this rights because I am an event organizer NDNT (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello User:NDNT. Could you tell use more about the event you're organising? And will you be organising things on English Wikipedia or on French Wikipedia, where you seem to have more edits. You're very new still on English Wikipedia, and while we sometimes grant temporary event coordinator rights to very new users, we'd like a bit more information. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

It is on French Wikipedia, my Project was approved by WikiFranca. NDNT (talk) 20:06, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

In that case, you can request the user role on French Wikipedia, which takes place on their administrators' noticeboard. However, this right is generally reserved for editors with at least 300 edits, so this is something to take into consideration before applying. The roles on French and English Wikipedia are separate, and most of the benefits of each are localized to their respective projects. (edit 15:41, 25 March 2026 (UTC): fixed the link to fr:Wikipédia:Organisateur d'évènements that showed up as an interlanguage link) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:57, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: @NDNT. please request this on french Wikipedia. Their typical requirement is a minimum of 300 edits across project if I understand the criteria correctly. You have fewer than 100 edits so far, so you might need to gain further experience before asking. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

@Chaotic Enby and @Femke, thank you for information . NDNT (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

and support NDNT (talk) 07:30, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Rekhamoni Duari

• Rekhamoni Duari (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting file mover rights Rekhamoni Duari (talk) 07:03, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) It is extremely unlikely you will be given this right. You need a reason for requesting. Toast1454_TC 12:09, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Reason for declining file move rights voorts (talk/contributions) 14:23, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Slamforeman

• Slamforeman (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've made 2,142 edits to Wikipedia and created many new articles and redirects. I would love to be able to increase my contributions to Wikipedia through cleaning up the backlog of new articles. Slamforeman (talk) 02:28, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Losipov

• Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I previously applied for this permission some years ago (August 2023), and was granted a 1-month trial. I then applied for full rights, but was declined due to some problems with nominations and approvals (including in draftspace). I've taken some time to review the basics for surviving AfD, and am requesting another shot at this (even if it is only for another month). I feel like I can contribute meaningfully to NPP, especially given that the backlog is rapidly growing. If it will not be granted due to those concerns, I completely understand.

Thank you for considering my request :) Losipov (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

another month long trial run seems warranted,  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:21, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:BookishReader

• BookishReader (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've created, edited, and fixed a lot of articles. I mainly contribute to Pakistan-related articles and have been monitoring new articles feed for some time now. I think there are very limited number of active editors that specialize in Pakistani sources, so someone like me can help fill the gap. BookishReader (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done, AfD and article creation track record is strong enough that I don't think a trial run is needed. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:30, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Rht bd

• Rht bd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to review new pages based on policies and guidelines. I found that there is a huge backlog of AfC submissions waiting to be reviewed. So I thought I might help clearing the backlog. I have proper knowledge of Wikipedia policies specially the policies needed to review AfC like WP:GNG, WP:RS, WP:5, WP:COI etc. I have a good history of maintaining articles, marking for deletion, cleaning up articles, expanding and creating new articles in Wikipedia. Hopefully I can help if I get this user right. Thanks. Rht bd (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC) Rht bd (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:34, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Kvinnen

• Kvinnen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I would like to be a new page reviewer as I am keen to broaden the scope of how I contribute on Wikipedia. With almost 5k edits now and over 300 unique votes on Afd pages, I believe I have more than just a preliminary understanding of what Wikipedia is and what WP:WIKIPEDIAISNOT. With this knowledge in mind, I would love to help others make pages of good quality and generally contribute productively here. Thanks for your consideration. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC) _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Absolutiva

• Absolutiva (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Chat-qui-Aboie

• Chat-qui-Aboie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

• Phlogiston Enthusiast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand.

Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Of note, possibly: Following my removal of every single known instance of a specific syntax error, I have gone up to 1030 edits. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also every instance of this one. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This brings it up to 1053. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

After doing both again today I'm up to 1093. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) That isn't really relevant to rollback though; admins will check your edits when they review this, and reverts and counter-vandalism is what matters for rollback. HurricaneZeta^C 16:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to say I understand to an extent what does and does not break syntax. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:51, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Also worth ammending is that it would provide access to interceptor, which is a useful tool I believe I could do a great deal of antivandalism with in a way that is more efficient than the typical recent changes page. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also of note: I am now a Pending Changes Reviewer. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Phlogiston Enthusiast, an admin will review the needed information. I don't see how a lot of these notes are relevant to rollback; pending changes requires some overlapping skills with rollback (such as the ability to effectively determine what is vandalism), but it is an entirely different right for good reason, and does require different skills. Rollback's primary purpose is to assist with recent changes patrolling. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to put everything on the table here. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 02:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Adding comment so it is clear this is still open and so it doesn't get archived from inactivity. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not to sound picky, just wanted to make sure two weeks of inactivity and lack of approval/denial wouldn't make this stagnate and die. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 19:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding another comment, since it has now been 22 without this being responded too and I don't want this to get archived. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

It has been twenty-seven days and there has been no administrator response, or even so much as a comment. In the most respectful way possible, I would like to know why, as other people have recieved responses in that time. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:12, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Theeverywhereperson

• Theeverywhereperson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to renew my rollback rights, because I have been using AntiVandal constructively, and the same other reasons as my most recent request. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Namely:

1. I am a recent changes patroller and have been patrolling for a few months now,
2. I have made more than 700 edits in mainspace and more than 1700 edits in total,
3. Since I am already a pending changes reviewer, I am also used to reverting vandalism in some areas where it isn't visible to everyone yet, so I think I am trained for the job,
4. This would allow me to use tools like AntiVandal to revert vandalism easier and faster, for the benefit of Wikipedia as a whole.

Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am already doing antivandal/recent change patrol work, and am alredy familiar with Twinkle, but wish for rollbacker permissions to be able to use more powerful tools, such as AntiVandal. Thank you for your consideration in advance! Legendbird (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

This editor only has 148 non-automated mainspace edits, --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:OzmoOzmo

• OzmoOzmo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Recently I have been facing disruptive editors who have been making edits extremely quickly. For example, HermeneuticMind, who was adding LLM-generated content to articles en masse, and Goldfishgonnabedeadsoon.

With rollback, I will be able to revert these unconstructive editors much faster than pressing the [vandalism] button with Twinkle for every one of their edits, which is inconvenient, inefficient and slow. -- ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contributions) 11:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

And will also be able to use more powerful tools such as WP:HG and WP:ANVDL. Thank you, ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contribs) 06:19, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a little concerned by the recent use of Ultraviolet to do a BLP revert on an article on someone who has been dead since 1984. Access to instant rollback needs to come with a pattern of not just automatically reverting without carefully checking the context. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:AriuCH

• AriuCH (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’d like to request rollback rights. I’ve been reverting clear vandalism and unsourced edits on several pages, using concise edit summaries and staying out of any edit warring. I understand the purpose of rollback and would use it only for obvious vandalism and disruptive edits. AriuCH (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 194 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 01:30, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:NuggFrog

• NuggFrog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:CharlesEditor23

• CharlesEditor23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am once again requesting the template editor right. I have met the guidelines for granting, especially number 4, which is that I have had no behavioral blocks or WP:3RR violations for a minimum of six (6) months or more. The main reason why I am requesting the template editor right again is so that I may be able to make productive, meaningful contributions to protected templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data that are in line with established WP:CONSENSUS with many other editors. I believe that if granted the template editor right again, I can demonstrate that I will avoid the first criteria for revocation, which is performing obviously controversial edits without first determining WP:CONSENSUS. I will also demonstrate that I will only use wise & prudent template editing and test my changes in the sandboxes first. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

See and for previous requests — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a bit torn. On the one hand, they have had all but one module edit request accepted (and the other partly done) since their last request in September. On the other hand, I am concerned about these edits; they were rightly made in the sandbox, but only because the /data module is template-protected. This is the same sort of thing that was happening as far back as 2021 and led to their rights being revoked. I also found this which is not the right way to make a dummy edit.

Now, have I done similar things in the past? Sure, I'm pretty sure there are a few from this year even. We shouldn't be expecting perfection out of a TPE, because that is just unrealistic. However, mistakes should be few and far between for a TPE or admin, and not happening often enough to get repeated warnings going back five years. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

OK, so no, I guess I can never get approved again to get the WP:TPE right? What should I do or say to better my chances of being approved? CharlesEditor23 (talk) 07:10, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I never said that; I am considering some things, primarily another short-term trial, but am waiting on other admins to comment. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Yerlo

• Yerlo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now and would like access to TAIV rights. When I encounter an instance of clear vandalism, I usually check the editor's other contributions for other inappropriate edits. It is quite frustrating to see 2-5 or 6-10 other TAs on a shared IP address without being able to see the edits they made. Yerlo (talk) 21:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:39, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

User:ConnerTT

• ConnerTT (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been doing recent changes patrolling for quite awhile now, my account is 6+ months old, not including my IP address's old edits at Special:Contributions/71.59.186.230. I would like this IP viewer right because I believe it would make anti-vandalism easier and more streamlined for me. I am used to the old process of reverting and reporting IPs; and when we switched over to using temp-accounts instead, anti-vandalism got a bit more challenging. That being said, I believe I am ready and am willing to use the tool according to Wikipedia's policies. Thanks! ConnerTT (talk) 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC) ConnerTT (talk) 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:41, 23 March 2026 (UTC)