User talk:20chances

Hey I just wanted to let you know that the Yankees one isn't included because it's a list of unsuccessful comebacks after they evened the series (meaning they'd go 3-3 and then lose game 7). Anything besides that isn't really relevant because we're talking about comebacks here, not a list of every 3-0 sweep, the article would be way too long. Have a good day bro Mwiqdoh (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

@Mwiqdoh It was probably a mistake on my part and I just reversed it myself. 20chances (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

No worries man I just remember reading you saying to let you know if it should be included or not, so I thought it'd be better to tell you why instead of leaving you confused. Mwiqdoh (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I appreciate discussing about it. 20chances (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2026 New York Red Bulls season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. // hekatlys [talk] 04:16, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

@Hekatlys, I was already working on it as I speak, since the Schedule was already published. I need time to work on it. 20chances (talk) 04:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the sources are primary because they are the main subject's own website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2026 New York Red Bulls season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, 20chances! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire I am frustrated that this is constantly denied given that this is an draft for an upcoming season that is yet to be made. Do you understand that this is a sports related page? The season is starting soon, and you want to claim that this is constantly the same reason for the sources? THIS IS DIRECLTY from the team! Even other pages constantly do this! 20chances (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

I understand how you feel, but from an AFC reviewer's standpoint, a draft full of primary sources is not a draft that has established the subject's notability. Going by WP:NSEASON and WP:GNG, I did not think the draft was notable enough for an article yet. The first game will start in a couple weeks and then, and then I would happily consider accepting the draft. However, before the main season has started and you haven't cited any WP:INDEPENDENT coverage, I do not believe it is ready to be accepted. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 18:09, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Then how come other MLS Teams have pages up already? That's the problem I see from y'all. I am still trying to grow all this information but y'all want to put up excuses with it. This is not right for me, and when we're trying to get it ready before the first game of the season starts. 20chances (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

I am not trying to put up an excuse, and note that not all articles are sent through AFC or quickly reviewed by a new page reviewer. Might not be the exact case, but similar to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because there is an article for other teams does not mean we need to move this draft to the mainspace regardless whether or not it has shown notability. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 18:42, 8 February 2026 (UTC)