User talk:2719Hyperion

Hi 2719Hyperion! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 21:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

If you think that it should be at EPCOT rather than Epcot then you need to start a move request following the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial to move all the articles and not just a few. However, before you do that read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies) especially the section Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)#Capitalization and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, George Kamel, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

What reason specifically was responsible for the article being redirected? All sources were verifiable and Kamel is a widely known figure due to his association with The Ramsey Show, which is the second most popular radio show in America. Was it because of the YouTuber classification?

I'm going to revert the article and change the approach. 2719Hyperion (talk) 13:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ramsey Solutions. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I adjusted the article as requested to make it sound less promotional. No conflict of interest—I write/edit articles on a variety of subjects and have known about Dave Ramsey and his teachings for over a decade. I based the format on several Wikipedia articles I found for other companies—product profiles, company division descriptions, etc. Several pieces of information were transferred from Dave Ramsey's Wikipedia article, as they didn't pertain to Ramsey himself (there was a tag on that article for improvement and reorganization). Will republish. Thank you for your feedback. 2719Hyperion (talk) 02:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Ramsey Solutions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Just put the logo back on the Ramsey Solutions article. The article was moved to draft mode by another editor/admin. I made the necessary corrections and the article is back up. I added the logo back to the article. 2719Hyperion (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

There is a discussion related to you on the COI noticeboard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Dave_Ramsey Thenightaway (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Delony, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Delony until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Coleman (radio host), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Coleman (radio host) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Kamel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Kamel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi 2719Hyperion. I'd assumed that someone had notified you of WP:COI prior to the discussion at the noticeboard, and so would be familiar with Wikipedia:Independent sources. I hope those make clearer the problems that editors are seeing with the Ramsey-related articles. --Hipal (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Regarding your comments about primary sources: Briefly summarizing: we write articles from independent, secondary sources. Primary sources might be used to add details and clarify information from those secondary sources. --Hipal (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Could you please respond here? I'd like to think this can be worked out, but you're making it very difficult. --Hipal (talk) 17:21, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm not trying to make things difficult...I'm trying, with the best of intentions, to understand the guidelines as they are written. I've taken some time to read over everything and it still says that primary sources like biographies and company websites can be used to confirm hard dates and provide relevant quotes. I've also scoured other Wikipedia biographical articles and have seen several with extensive quotes from autobiographies on and interviews with the subject. That's why your assertions that only secondary sources are allowed is so confusing. If you like, I can point you towards those biographical articles that cite primary sources like interviews. How are these any different? I genuinely want to know.

Also, I worked on eliminating the biased language in the Dave Ramsey article. I read through all the info on the Wikipedia guidelines, and I think I have a better grasp on the concept. Thank you for your help. I didn't remove the banner yet, however. Wasn't sure it was my place, but the discussion has stopped for over two weeks. You're welcome to review. 2719Hyperion (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for responding.

I'm not saying that only secondary sources are allowed, but that they should be the bulk of the sourcing. WP:BLPPRIMARY states, Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies.

Generally, looking for examples in other articles is not a good way to understand policy unless relevant, policy-based discussion backs the examples. --Hipal (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Ramsey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Hill and Thomas Nelson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, 2719Hyperion,

Thank you for creating Fanfare for Oscar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It requires multiple reliable, secondary and independent references to the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fade258}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fade258 (talk) 01:12, 20 September 2025 (UTC)