User talk:4-RAZOR 01

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to TV-D1, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. FatCat96 (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

hello , just got these https://www.isro.gov.in/Gaganyaan_TV-D1_Mission.html printed over 4-RAZOR 01 (talk) 14:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uno (card game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 19:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your Moon landings edit, nice. Just wanted to remind you to not put a space after adding commas and periods, those spaces show up in the text. Thanks! Randy Kryn (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

p.s. Just did a few edits on the article listed above and noticed you lowercased 'moon'. Luckily (and commonsensicly) Moon is uppercased on Wikipedia if it refers to the Moon orbiting Earth (and Earth is uppercased too, as is Solar System, Sun, and a couple others). Best of holidays to you, and good to have you on board, great things ahead! Randy Kryn (talk) 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

p.s., and whoops, there is already Chandrayaan-4 in namespace. Maybe you can add some of your edits and language to that page. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks , will work better to avoid it a lot soon . Thx 4 the help RAZOR-X (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page PSLV-C58, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 15:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

ok , thanks , plz reprase that part in the above page , could do a lot of good RAZOR-X (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

You did a good work on PSLV-C58 article. Thank you for your contribution. Cheers!

Dcotos (talk) 11:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. Thank you for your work on PSLV-C58. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, 4-RAZOR 01, Nice work! please write edit summery while editing as per WP:EDITSUMCITE. Thank you

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

THX RAZOR-X (talk) 13:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kinetic Engineering Limited, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited INS Sharada (P55), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranians. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Gaganyaan-2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kinetic E-Luna instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kinetic E-Luna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

thanks , I had just found a loophole in the system and used it to publish the page without any hassle or anybody reviewing it . Yours truly. RAZOR-X (talk) 08:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, please don't put spaces before punctuation. There is no space before the "," character. It should be used, in this way. Looking at your talk page it seems people have told you about this before but you're ignoring their instructions. This is true of all English language usage in all locations, not just Wikipedia. There is _never_ a space before commas. Ergzay (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Oh , sorry , I try and fix it from now , it happens when a type fast . Thanks RAZOR-X (talk) 05:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Mazagon Dock Limited Next Generation OPV, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Geardona (talk to me?) 14:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

THANKS A LOTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RAZOR-X (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:46, Sunday, March 3, 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:49, Sunday, March 3, 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:49, Sunday, March 3, 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:49, Sunday, March 3, 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:09, Tuesday, March 5, 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:30, Tuesday, March 5, 2024 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:41, Tuesday, March 5, 2024 (UTC)

Hello 4-RAZOR 01! Your additions to Agnibaan SOrTeD have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 15:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh, am sorry , I wasn't able to to find a lot of sources, I will try to get more sources and add them to the page . Thanks for informing me. Maybe I'll give a beeter performance in writing the article when they really do launch the flight. Thanks.. RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure of the coverage, but it might make more sense to redirect it to Agnibaan and discuss it there if there aren't enough sources. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 15:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

There are enough sources to say that Agnikul is planning this flight at this point in time but not enough still delveing into what it does . I generally get the first data and put in it directly. Not many say that Agnikul Cosmos will do this will do that for this. I'll take better care on citing. Maybe I'll wait till they'll release the official flight plan, then I can write it down in my own words. I generally put in almost all points given in the article. I am terribly sorry if I breached any guidelines. I see to it and wait for more sources. 😔 RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 15:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Gaganyaan-5, which you proposed for deletion. Deletion is not cleanup. Improper citation style is not a valid PROD reason. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to TRISHNA has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. WhoAteMyButter (🌷_talk│🌻^contribs) 07:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

You introduced copyrighted text into INS Kolkata as well. Please be more careful. WhoAteMyButter (🌷_talk│🌻^contribs) 08:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello WhoAteMyButter , can you please inform me which source I used in INS Kolkata? I had used I quite a lot. Thanks for informing, this is like the 3rd time I've made this mistak. I am still learning to avoid but sources are scant and far btween RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 08:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

My edit summaries, the article's talk pages, and the article's {{copyvio-revdel}} template all include the URL. I've included the below list for your convenience:

• TRISHNA: CNES
• INS Kolkata: New Indian Express

WhoAteMyButter (🌷_talk│🌻^contribs) 08:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok , I will check RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 09:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of GSLV launches. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry for introducing links in draft articles, @Arjayay, however my previous draft was turned down due to lack of links, and I had to re-link is with an additional 10 references. That was why I introduced links. Never mind, I have saved them, I will them shortly before publication. TC & have a G'day RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 04:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chandrayaan 4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

im sorry, but such a page now exists. i will get it deleted pronto RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 13:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Avgeekamfot. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit to Akasa Air added puffery which should only be added if it can be sourced to a reliable source (not an interview with the founder). Avgeekamfot (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I am terribly sorry for that. I did not realise that my writing was not talking from a neutral point. Thank you for fixing it. I'll do my best to avoid such incidents from now. RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 10:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chandrayaan 4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GSLV F14, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canadarm3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaganyaan-3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "GSLV F14".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaganyaan-2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to RLV Technology Demonstration Programme has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I created an article on Project 18-class destroyer of the Indian Navy. Can you suggest if there are any problems (like reference/citation) with the article? Aviator Jr (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

@Aviator Jr, the article is perfect. Yove done a good job there (funnily I was actually writing as draft for it and was planning to publish it, but I've seen yours.) It fits the bill perfectly
I look forward to seeing more such edits and keep on going buddy!

Jai Hind!🇮🇳

Yours truly RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @4-RAZOR 01! Jai Hind🇮🇳. Aviator Jr (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GSLV-F15, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited INS Tushil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Victoria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your edit to Small Satellite Launch Vehicle has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. Diannaa (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry, I couldn't find many more sources. I'll try to avoid such edits from now. Thanks for warning me. RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:10, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, I will keep it in mind RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

I add recent event 2025 Kerala oil spill by --Sunuraju (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Cool, thanks I will add it to relavent topics!👍👍👍👏 RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

I was thinking of creating an article listing India's military grade radars (mostly developed by India's DRDO), on the lines of the rather recently created List of Indian military missiles and List of active Indian military aircraft. This was because of the fact that many of the radars India developed does not have its article yet and it is being confusing as to where the details of those radars be included.

For example, Details of Ashwini LLTR radar by LRDE was included in List of equipment of the Indian Army until recently (I removed it since the radar is for the IAF not IA), it has been included in IACCS and, interestingly, is also present in Projects of DRDO#Navy (which is incorrect and confusing and lists all DRDO radars irrespective of whether or not they were meant for the service's use).

Initially, I want to include India's indigenous radars only which can and will be expanded to include all of active military radars irrespective of their origin. This way we can also reduce the load on the Projects of DRDO#Radars section. I have also raised the matter with other users including AbhijnanGhosh87, Surabhi9191 and Shashpant.

I am here to collect suggestions on the construction of the article and what certain categories to include there. Thanks, Aviator Jr (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC).

Yes, @Aviator Jr, I belive that it is great idea, while we can create a drag for submission, in the interim we can expand List of Radars#India. Ready to work on the article anytime RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 14:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I've created a Draft:List of Indian Military Radar systems, as I can't find reliable sources on civilian radar. Hopefully we can find good enough sources to fill it up with content. Right now it's just a transduced extract. RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Nice drafting, will try to add as much as I can find citing reliable source is tantamount, civilian aviation radar systems need to be studied ,else the title should be changed to Indian Military Radars.@Aviator Jr AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 15:59, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

The page, List of Indian military radars, has been published. Aviator Jr (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vararuchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pool.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Voting for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01. Thank you for your work on INS Mahe (2022). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this article about Indian Navy! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:19, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thank you @SunDawn! I was just helping out jolly old wiki, and am ready to work to build up the rest of the Mahe class.

See you on the top editors soon. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Dear 4-RAZOR 01,

Your wiki anniversary was 14 days ago, marking 2 years (as per SUL) of dedicated service! I wanted to extend a heartfelt thanks for your amazing contributions. With over 3,386 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead!

Use this Tool to send wiki anniversary wishes to other amazing Wikimedians.

-- : Suyash Dwivedi (💬) 09:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE WISHES! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 11:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

A courtesy note to let you know that simpleflying.com has been deprecated as an unreliable source and should not be used. See WP:SIMPLEFLYING. I have removed it from Air India. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Got it! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Indian Military Radar systems, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

A new project led by the Airports Authority of India has commenced at Chingen. Though it shall be utilised primarily as a civilian airport, the airfield will also serve the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy, which also operates INS Baaz in the northern part of the island. THe development is also reportedly related with the International Container Transshipment Port, Galathea Bay. Source: https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/top-headlines/groundwork-starts-for-second-nicobar-airfield-close-to-key-china-route/.

I am confused as to whether add this piece of information only under List of airports in India or also in articled like Great Nicobar Island, List of Indian Air Force stations and List of Indian Navy bases. I would like if a joint discussion is held with you, @Surabhi9191, @Cdr. Erwin Smith, @Badrinarayan konar and @AbhijnanGhosh87. Thanks, Aviator Jr (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2025 (UTC).

from the looks of it, I think it is best to keep it as Chingan Airport, or whatever AAI names it. We can see the same in case of Bhuj Airport which is an important IAF MiG base (as Bhuj Rudra Mata) and INS hansa (Goa Airport).I suggest that we keep the airport as is- as the information I looked up suggest the Navy will use it much like an Exclave (a larger one - such as their P8I base in Kochi Airport, despite having dedicated MRO facilities at INS Garuda a few km south).

Possible linkage can include the Tri-service Andaman and Nicobar Command, List of airports in India as well as maybe a footnote under INS Baaz.

Overall, im gonna be curious to see how the airport will eventually be run. My guess is that it would be like how Agatti Airport in the Lakshdweep is linked to far-off INS Jatyu in minicoy by provide patrol fieds for naval heron drones. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

In my opinion, it should only exist in List of airports in India and Great Nicobar Island.

I get it's dual-use in nature, but I'm also seeing all Indian Airforce bases having a clear AFS, and all Indian Naval bases a clear INS designation. Cdr. Erwin Smith (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

How I am contributing Badrinarayan konar (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

I would recommend In list of airports of India It should be added as it is a airport of India Badrinarayan konar (talk) 14:51, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

I guess we have mostly agreed on a point. @4-RAZOR 01, @Badrinarayan konar and @Cdr. Erwin Smith. Could any of you add the details in List of List of airports in India and Great Nicobar Island articles along with a suitable citation? Aviator Jr (talk) 15:24, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Roger, WILCO 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Done! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Aviator Jr (talk) 04:51, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi 4-RAZOR 01. Thank you for your work on LVM3-M2. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article, your work is greatly appreciated! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 10:59, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank YOU !!!!!! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey 4-RAZOR 01, just to check, did you mean to delete 15,994 bytes of the article? Kind Regards Squawk7700 (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

nah mate, i moved it to a reactions page i created found at. International reactions to the 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

I think a seperate page would capture more detailed reactions and we can leave a summary for reactions on the main page 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks I didn't see that Squawk7700 (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hope evertone contribute there as well! Cheers ! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Just to be sure, I haven't been able to retrace the edit history, was this originally a WP:SPLIT? As then I think there is an Attribution problem in need of fixing. (I'll do it if you would like) Rgds Squawk7700 (talk) 16:24, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

yeah it was a cut past, i should have done that. thanks for letting me up on that 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

No problem, I went ahead and fixed it, cheers! Squawk7700 (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

The article International reactions to the 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTNEWS. Unnecessary fork from main article.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bondegezou (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International reactions to the 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bondegezou (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Got it, onto work it is 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bharathamatha CMI Public School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

K, will do so 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, 4-RAZOR 01. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Indian Military Radar systems".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:23, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page EOS-N1, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

k, on it 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 18:53, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

If you keep doing close paraphrasing, as you did at Space Based Surveillance project (India), you'll be blocked from editing. You can look at my edit summaries in the page history to see which pages you copied from. I'd recommend you take some time to understand the copyright policy, and don't write any more articles until you understand it. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. You can also ask for help at the teahouse. lp0 on fire () 18:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh, Sorry, I will see to it, I made my best efforts to avoid copyright violations while typing it in. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 02:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Don't worry: it can be confusing. To be clear, swapping each word for a synonym is not enough. You should write your own sentences, and they should be summaries of the sources. lp0 on fire () 07:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

K, Thank you very much, I will rewrite the page in tonight with adherence to WP: COPYRIGHT 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page KID (spacecraft), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:35, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page PSLV-C62, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page EOS-N1, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

done 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 05:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shubhanshu Shukla, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. tony 05:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey @TonySt Thank you for informing me. I was still working on the page when i recived, sorry for late answer. I have attached the releavent tags to the page so that the neccasary history can be merged from the two respective pages. I have taken the tables from Shaurya Chakra and redirected a similar link with a portion of the table from List of Shaurya Chakra award recipients (2020–2029) to this page. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page PSLV-C62, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chandrayaan-4, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

As I saw you are an extended confirmed member, I want to make an request to you. Please respond here TheInspectorInCity (talk) 07:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello @TheInspectorInCity, Which article is it? Please do inform me, I will try to see making it neutral! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 08:39, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

This one :- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflict. Indian official statements such as 6 PAF jets shot down, 10-12 jets destroyed inside airbases are not even mentioned here. Further biased sources such as of Alan Warnes who is associated with PAF for more than 24 sources his written AirForce Monthly are there as sources. French website said about 35 Rafale upgrade is also not here. BS022 Rafale seen on Republic Day is also mentioned here. IACC Barnala struck, 34 sites struck this words are mentioned here despite the fact that there is no verified satallite imagery of any kind of damage on Indian military installations according to neutral sources. Swiss think tank report is also not here. This article is heavily biased with no satallite images available from official sources are present too. You should do something if you can't do anything on this particular article. Make a seperate article on Operation Sindoor TheInspectorInCity (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, we are , particularly Slaterstevan are talking about the use of sources here at the webpage. Unfortunately as we know Pakistan won the Narrative war as the Indian government refuses to publically acknowledge Indian losses. Regarding the Swiss source the talk page is still live there as for No damage to India it is mentioned on the page on the failure of operation Bunyan ul marsoos. If I remember I think BS22 was added I'll se to that!

Thanks for sharing! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I want you to make a new article with heading of Operation Sindoor, where every opinon is respected. Please it's an request and much needed. For your kind reason, Tommy Tamtomo and Tom Cooper all accepted that there were more PAF losses than Indian losses. Can you make a seperate article on Operation Sindoor? TheInspectorInCity (talk) 09:07, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

As we can find the both the pages for Operation Sindoor and Operation Buyan ul marsoos have been redirected to the main page, It establishes protocol that we do not directly de-merge pages. Although Operation Sindoor was a major succes, with the scope of the broader conflict it was the only major Indian operation.

Since the conflict page is quite volatile and prone to de-stabilisation (like yesterday's t20 game), It is best kept at its current form with us editors doing our best to contribute to making it more neutral. It really did not help that our sources had published a lot of fake news at that time, causing reliability issues that prevent them being the main citations. As a result pak-funded efforts on CNN remain the main source, leading to the neutrality of the pages being in dispute.

TLDR While I can't make a page exclusively for sindhoor, I can work on presenting the Indian objectives on the page in a more concise way. I will do my best on that.

regards 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I think a different page is need of an hour. You should create a different page with all the satallite images in it. There is an editor not naming him he is trying to show that Pakistani response just before ceasefire. However no satallite image is visible. You should definitely look into the point of creating a new page it should be more effective and efficient towards facts and proofs. Not just local media. Many things are missing in the so called main article. You should definitely make an another page with every official statements and evidence provided such as those official released strike videos and satallite images released. Please look after it. TheInspectorInCity (talk) 17:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I will work on a draft soon. till then, i shall incorporate as much as possible on the main page

4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Are you creating a different page Operation Sindoor  ? TheInspectorInCity (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

You may not circumvent the WP:CT/SA restrictions by recruiting others to make edits on your behalf. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir👍 You are absolutely right! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 03:31, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Let me be clear. I will not be making a new page at all. However, Based on looking at most of the talk pages, It seems clear that a consensus might soon be reached on using Indian sources so data will be added.

In addition, I would like to close out with the line that as Wikipedia is International, making it only citing the Indian variant of events makes it Propoganda-pedia, which is not what Wikipedia is about 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 03:30, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of ships present at International Fleet Review 2026, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

The IONS link redirects to Institute of Noetic Sciences. However, the same full form stands for Indian Ocean Naval Symposium. I think it should be rectified. What's your say? Aviator Jr (talk) 09:06, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Well, it would be better to create a disambiguation page to differentiate both. I'll look up on it in the evening and possibly built it as a disambig page 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 09:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

That's great, Thanks. Aviator Jr (talk) 10:32, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

On 27 February 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Sure thing! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 07:45, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

As I saw you made an correct order in the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict article, I want to talk about the pro Pakistani bias in the article, you will see biasedness in the article. (1) Alan Warnes associated with PAF since 2001 claimed something huge "IACC Barnala" destroyed, 34 sites struck. Despite Pakistani officials on May said that only 26 sites are targeted. One who will read that first part and between, will understand easily that the entire article is written on Pakistani perspective. Here are all the points which identified this paid propaganda of Alan Warnes even before he published that article :- (1) https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/how-china-faked-rafale-kill-narrative-to-push-its-own-jets/articleshow/125440599.cms (2) https://theprint.in/world/aerial-warfare-analyst-tom-cooper-faults-indias-military-pr-says-pakistan-does-it-better/2753536/ (here alan warnes article mentioned as british journo) .... and many more you can do your research IACC Barnala which he claimed destroyed showed no damage not a single crack ans pnmn er satellite image analyzed by credible satellite image analyst associated with planet labs Damien Symon posted it on X here it is :-https://x.com/detresfa_/status/1968228426600550fpr478?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1968228426600550478%7Ctwgr%5Eeac0149f43748e263253225a4a0d65b0e6bbf912%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fzeenews.india.com%2Findia%2Fpakistani-author-shares-satellite-images-to-claim-paf-damaged-indian-air-base-gets-fact-checked-instantly-2961003.html. I hope you will do your research here well through EOSAT satallite imagery available on OSINT.

Indian claims of shooting down 6 PAF jets by S-400, destroying 10-12 jets inside airbase is not mentioned here too. In December 2025, many Indian analysts argue that american F-16 upgrade is because of Indian strikes damaged them is not mentioned here too. They mentioned KeyAero article on S-400 struck probability but do not even reported that Indian PM Narendra Modi went onto that airbase on 13th May and even stand in front of launcher, went inside control and command center not even mentioned here once. I hope you will examine KeyAero articles claim of burn marks on Adampur Airbase through EOSAT satallite imagery.Tommy Tamtomo, vice chairman of Indonesian center of Air Power studies said that atleast 9 PAF jets were shot down or destroyed. Tom cooper, top aerial warfare analyst said that about 20-30 PAF jets were shot down or destroyed in the conflict. Not a single claim even mentioned here. BSF destroying 118 pakistani posts, terror launchpads is not even mentioned here too-https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/bsf-carried-out-planned-attack-on-let-launchpad-just-3-km-from-loc-after-cross-border-shelling-from-pak-ig/articleshow/121431309.cms?from=mdr. Pakistani samma tv even published an entire list of 155 Pakistani soldiers killed by India during Operation Baniyan ul Marsoos is not even mentioned here. Here is the deleted article link-https://archive.ph/EaiIH. you should also check The New York Times, The Washington Post/Quarterly, The Stimpson center all concluded that no verified damage at single Indian military installation. This wikipedia article is full of pakistani propaganda. Indian official claim of Pakistani DGMO asking for ceasefire is also not there but pakistani shahbaz sharif claim of getting requested for ceasefire is not mentioned. US FARA Calls of Pakistani officials also not present here of over 60 times. The mention of Pakistan scared because of "India's New Normal" is also not present in the wikipedia article. The Swiss think tank report which said that its Indian operational success is not mentioned here further. Michael Rubin, former Pentagon official, senior member of American Enterprise Institute also said Indian victory both diplomatically and militarily not mentioned here too, he also said turkish drones biggest looser and Indian air defence worked wonderfully in the conflict is not mentioned here too, the National Interest claim of HQ-9 failure is not mentioned here too. No doubt this article is highly biased and looks like a pakistani propaganda article. There are numerous international articles which mentioned about Indian military success in the conflict including above source mentioned article this are also not mentioned here. I want you to take necessary step to completely delete this propaganda article like one of the users mentioned in the talk page and create a separate page on Operation Sindoor with all neutral, Indian, Pakistani claims, + satallite images released by India, new york times and other sources.Indian reports of destroying 20% PAF assets are not mentioned in the article properly.Link here https://indianexpress.com/article/india/details-of-pak-losses-emerge-20-of-paf-infra-several-warjets-officer-among-50-killed-10002083/. Its my earnest request to make the article more neutral and its4 totally biased towa4rds Pakistan. You and other Indian defence wikipedians should take note of this and remove this article if things are not changed. I am again telling you to cross check each of my facts from articles i provided, your own research, social media and obviously satallite images. Alan Warnes is associated with PAF since 2001 and this Rafale kills article is his propaganda article. I hope you will verify each and every points and verify them with satallite images, EOSAT satallite images found if there are any burn marks present or not. Thanking you, hope you will reply ~2026-13080-48 (talk) 08:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Anonymous User, Ok I will see. However it is not a very easy task, seeing most Indian sources are a bit more frowned upon as we published more propoganda there. Most claims have been mentioned anyways. The neutrality is on balance, so Iarge changes will be unstabilising the article. If needed I will ask other editors to review proposed changes. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

You must Understand that I CANNOT Write a page just for Operation Sindoor as that would violate NPOV guidlines. In a previous discussion I have also laid down the same. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I mean you cannot a new page on 2025 Indian strikes in Pakistan ? surely i cannot believe this, here it is perfect example June 2025 Israeli strikes on Iran, see if allowed you should definitely look into it, it is important ~2026-13080-48 (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Man, hate to break it to you but I have already had this conversation two weeks ago. As per the merger history for the article titled operation Sindhoor and operation Bunyan ul marsoos, all data is to be merged to one page with neutral american or other equivalent foreign links.

The problem their is that our Government has N.O.T given any proper strike assesments such as how many targets we hit proper, exact damage caused , Pakistani aircraft shot down, How many losses we incurred etc. This loses our point of credibility.

Despite suffering worser losses (arguably) The PAF has (paid or whatever) and showcased their version of claims quiker. And unlike our russian tech, Americans are interested in well american tech so they will dig around and find the story there. So they can present the succes of their weapons (and PAFs use of them). Unfortunately we do not have anything like that to say here in India, where the media freedom is falling day by day for such good claims to take effect.

A little snippet from me, I actually avoided editing that page in May last year so the available information can be collected, disseminated and proper conclusions could be drawn before publish inflammatory material.

When the Sarkar coughs up the full strike database and everything such as name of targets, number of missiles, number of aircraft, squadrons used, Exact kills of F16s and JF17s with Tail numbers and how we lost Rafale BS 2001, then rest assured that is going on the page.

TLDR: The problem is not the Page, the problem is The sources can be termed questionable, and given the sensitive topic might not be a good idea to present.

12:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC) 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do the needy atleast respond ~2026-13542-85 (talk) 06:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

I am not telling you to put these above claims as neutral source. I am telling you to at least put these sources. Because the article is looking like absolute pakistani propaganda article, the country whose press freedom index is much less than India. And I hope that The Indian Express, The Print, The Economic times this are not media but online news sources and newspapers known for its credibilty much more than Pakistani Geo TV, Samma TV, Dawn which are present there in article. Immediately remove all these KeyAero( particularly Alan Warnes paid propaganda article) and make this article neutral its too easy, put indian claims and satallite images released by india not as neutral sources but as claims. Satallite images are best proofs released. World will easily decide who the winner is. I think you will easily find it from multiple think tank, New York Times, The Washington Post, Damien Symon. Please come forward and take a necessary step among all ~2026-13542-85 (talk) 19:16, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Do this please don't let pakistani propaganda dominate the article ~2026-13542-85 (talk) 06:55, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay, chill, I see to it after this IRAN conflict blows over. But i cannot (and will not disobey) wikipedia guidelines on this topic. I want you to understand that. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 08:03, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

You are wrong about it. Most of the Indian claims are not present here. BSF's claim of destroying 118 Pakistani posts, terror launchpads. Indian claim of Pakistani DGMO asked for ceasefire, however on 15th May Shahbaz Sharif claim of being requested for ceasefire is mentioned there, The Indian report of destroying 20% Pakistani military asset is also not mentioned. This are not even mentioned. But somehow biased paid article of Alan Warnes said that IACC Barnala destroyed, "34 sites struck" it is available ? This is very very wrong and should not have happened, you should correct this with consulting other editors, many indian victory or success claims of Michael Rubin, Tom Cooper, RUSI, US army analyst John Spencer is not mentioned here too,Indian claim of shooting down over 600 Pakistani drone, loitering munitions, interception of missiles is also missing. You should look into the article and definitely make changes. For many months the article remained biased, not providing indian reports however all pakistani statements are placed accordingly. This is high time make the article free of biasedness ~2026-13080-48 (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Pipoin (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Oops, bother, I useally do write edit summaries with a +content or a +correction or a +hyperling fields. Since i am typing much on my phone, i just hit publish and it flies off. I will add edits summaries and change the warning settings for me in the edit window.

Thanks! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Pipoin (talk) 17:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Kerala RRTS corridor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

I see that your edits, while constructive, removed a number of corrections I made, including link restoration. Do you mind incorporating all the edits I made in the version above? I would appreciate your cooperation. CapeVerdeWave (talk) 08:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh No! I am terribly sorry for that!😔

Pls accept my apologies.

I am traveling right now so I won't be incorporated those edits right now, but I will do so when I can use my laptop again. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 09:59, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Where was this stuff copied from? Please follow the guideline on copying within Wikipedia so that the rest of us can follow along and to give credit to the original authors. Uhoj (talk) 20:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey I had mentioned that on the edit summary that I had cut it out from the main page (here being the 2026 Iran conflict) I did so only after a RfC for a split at that talk page,which was premeditated when someone already built and published a draft article.

Did I do anything wrong? Pls let me know 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 03:57, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

The edit summary says that the content comes from "the home page". It wasn't clear what page you meant. Please read copying within Wikipedia for instructions. At a minimum the edit summary should include a link to the source page. Uhoj (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Understood , I'll type something like Copied /Moved content from 2026 Iran conflict; please refer l that page's history for attribution by authors next time 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 02:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! That will be of great help to the rest of us. Uhoj (talk) 02:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sinking of IRIS Dena, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Iran war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Could you create a redirect link for A-50EI to Beriev A-50#A-50EI? A direct link to the Indian variant of the aircraft would be very helpful, since two of the very core components of the variant is not only of different design but from an other country of origin, including the engine and airborne radar. Aviator Jr (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Done!

Pls see A-50EI 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 10:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks👍 Aviator Jr (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page IRIS Bushehr, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

A specific Pinaka MBRL variant with 45 km is being referred to by multiple names by the citations throughout its testing. The ammunitions are named as Pinaka Enhanced as well as Pinaka Extended Range (Pinaka-ER). Meanwhile the entire system, the launcher, command & control and ammunition, is said as Enhanced Pinaka Rocket System (EPRS) or Pinaka Extended Range System.

What should be the heading of its sub section? Just for an opinion. @Badrinarayan konar. Aviator Jr (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Based on what i reserched, in the last 10 mins, i think EPRS would do. The Pinaka ER Would be the Projectile fired from it as there is potentialfor the system to also fire older generation Pinakas as well as New variants.

Also if you can, can you find the names/unit numbers of the 7 Pinaka regiments? It would look a little more like the operational history of Bramos.

Regards 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 13:02, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

It should be Enhanced Pinaka Rocket System (EPRS) is full name of it.Regards Badrinarayan konar (talk) 03:24, 23 March 2026 (UTC)