User talk:Aaaas216&

Hi Aaaas216&! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Its a pleasure, thank you fellow editor Aaaas216& (talk) 04:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@Aaaas216&:, আপনি List of serving generals of the Bangladesh Army নিবন্ধে খালি ময়মনসিংহ বিভাগ, চট্টগ্রাম বিভাগ, খুলনা বিভাগ এরকম লিখেন কেনো? আর্মির একটা ডিভিশন কি সিভিল ডিভিশনের সাথে মেলে নাকি? কোন জেলায় অবস্থিত তা লেখবেন (ডিস্ট্রিক্ট লেখবেন)। PhaiTime (talk) 07:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Hey buddy. I saw your name in Wikiproject Bangladesh, and noticed you are interested in military. Are you related to Bangladesh Defence Forces by any chance? CaptShayan (talk) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

Due to Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion policy, I am forbid to disclose much further detail of personal information, But, I can tell you that, yes. I am related and, or perhaps enthusiastic on Bangladesh Military. Happy editing! Aaaas216& (talk) 09:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shah Mohammad Ziaur Rahman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopalganj. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Hey there. I have seen you removing degrees from honorific suffix such as psc, afwc, ndc etc. Don't you know these are considered as post nominals in BANGLADESH ARMED FORCES and officer/jco/nco has authority to use it after their name? If you edit military articles I think you should have some basic knowledge about our armed forces. These were part of the article from a long time and you just removed it? Another thing I have seen is removing honorific suffix & prefix undet the reason "infobox military person does not need to add Prefixes and Suffixes". My man if it was unnecessary then the infobox creator wouldn't have added it. You should check articles of indian & pakistani generals, then I guess you would have some idea how to properly edit. 103.179.128.60 (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

waiting for a reply with proper logic. 103.179.128.52 (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello there. Hope you are having a good time. I have seen you removing psc, afwc, ndc etc from post nominals from various articles, can I ask you the reason? If you are related to army you should know officers are entitles to use it with there names, therefore it is necessary to add it in one's honorific suffix. If you see the official website of Bangladesh Army, you will see psc in General Waker's post nominal. Again if you see Armed Forces Division's website or BGB's website , you will see these with the respective office holder's name. If you ever get the chance to see the Army Officer's List (2006, 2011, 2014, 2021) you will see not only the medals such as SBP but also these degrees with the name. Since I have access to the latest one, I change the the informations based on the list.

Again I have seen you removing honorific suffix & prefix from articles having userbox military person. Is there any reason to do so? If you think this is "unnecessary" then the guy who created this infobox wouldn't have added it. Id advice you to stay away from editing military articles. As a person indirectly or directly related with the Bangladesh Army since 2007, this is not how you edit military articles. Another IP user also informed you about this, but I think you are unaware of it. Expecting a reply. Thanks. CaptShayan (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Some of this is covered at MOS:POSTNOM BUT, there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#MOS:POSTNOM about it. So far though there has been no change in MOS:POSTNOM.

Please also see the bit starting with "Editors should remember that the meaning of the most obvious (to them) post-nominal initials will not be obvious to some readers. When post-nominal initials are used, the meaning should be readily available to the reader"

Also covered in MOS:CREDENTIAL Doug Weller talk 10:47, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

This wikipedia and it is not maintained by Bangladesh Military, It is viewed by millions of people, Adding Bangladesh post nominals does not meet Wikipedia:Notability, hence most of readers would not even understand. Also @Doug Weller this user is a possible suspect of Wikipedia:MEAT. Should I make an SPI about this? Thanks. Aaaas216& (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

psc is not a bangladesh military term but a term used by most of the militaries of the world, check psc (military). afwc refers to armed forces war course, which is also similar to army war course of Pakistan army & Indian army (Army War College, Mhow). Hence I dont understand why do you keep removing titles such as psc, afwc & ndc from Honorific suffix.

If officials from India & Pakistan don't use psc, afwc & other degrees as post nominals it doesn't mean Bangladeshi officials wont. Kindly check other sources (BD Army, navy & air force website, BGB website / Army Officers List 2021 which is officially made by the Bangladesh Army). Removal of these degrees are not welcomed in the Bangladesh Armed Forces and thus you are not acknowledging their degrees.

Since you said most of the readers won't understand in that case you can a citation stating what does afwc mean while linking it to National Defence College (Bangladesh) as people obtain afwc from there. CaptShayan (talk) 07:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

@Aaaas216& all I am saying is properly add the honorific suffixes, if u think people won't understand add citations. If you think adding these are not worth it then try editing some other articles except bangladesh military. Because clearly you are ruining the articles in on or other way by removing informations. CaptShayan (talk) 07:49, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

@Aaaas216&@CaptShayan Please see WT:MOSBIO#Can someone please advise me on this discussion? Doug Weller talk 11:17, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

These are qualifications, and we don't use any postnoms for qualifications on Wikipedia. We only use postnoms relating to state honours and significant fellowships. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Necrothesp,

However in Bangladesh Armed Forces, along with the Medals we use these qualifications as post nominal with our name. For example : Colonel Mohammad Shafquat,SPP, afwc, psc. Here SPP is a medal, and afwc and psc are armed forces war course & post staff college respectively.

I acknowledge your statement, but since it has been a tradition in Bangladesh Armed Forces, I believe this should also continue in wikipedia.

Although there are no articles about a few degrees such as afwc, hdmc in that case perhaps we can use a citation and state the full meaning of it and where the person has obtained the degree?

, CaptShayan (talk) 17:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Ownership of content and MOS:POSTNOM for the reason we are not continuing those. You can discuss your opinions at WT:MOSBIO#Can someone please advise me on this discussion? as we are still figuring out. However I have added the Bangladeshi academic post noms in efn format so far on. Aaaas216& (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

This is also the case in the British Armed Forces. It is also the case with academic degrees. However, on Wikipedia we do not do this. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

As you did at Waker-Uz-Zaman. I'm referring to Awards and decorations of the Bangladesh Armed Forces. Doug Weller talk 11:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

@Aaaas216& Do you understand? Doug Weller talk 11:15, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes I removed pipe links at . Thanks for clarifying. Aaaas216& (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey buddy, hope you are doing well. I think I had created a confusion earlier regarding post nominals. I want to clear it as in my point of view it is a serious issue. I expect your co-operation and mutual understanding regarding that. CaptShayan (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Please do not apply WP:NOINDICSCRIPT rule to any Bangladesh-related articles.

On WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, it clearly says: This avoidance of Indic scripts only applies to articles that are predominantly India-related and is excluded from, among others, articles about Hinduism, Buddhism, or any of India's neighbouring countries. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 06:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

OK, Instead I added the Bengali scripts in footnotes. Do review them thanks. Aaaas216& (talk) 23:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia without their explicit permission. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information that appears to be about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy whether or not that information is correct. Wikipedia's policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing the page User:Battosai-sama; I suggest you leave this user alone - there is plenty else to do here. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

I deserve it. My bad :( Aaaas216& (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Aaaas216&, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Aaaas215& (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. I've blocked your additional account given that it appears to have been created in response to your partial block. Do not make any others. This is your only warning. Izno (talk) 06:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

I don't know this @Aaaas215& . I have only one wikipedia account and it is this account. Someone may be trying to impersonate me. Aaaas216& (talk) 07:11, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

@Izno I have no clue that there is someone who is using my username since April 25 this year. I want to do an SPI or checkuser on this. Could you guide me on how to enforce impersonating account Aaaas216& (talk) 07:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

For the page of MH Khan, please stop overwriting my edits. As someone very close to the Bangladesh Navy and M.H., I know at the very least how his name is spelt and where he was born. I don’t know who you are but please stop. Mhkhan31 (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

You're not allowed to claim any article even. Your not even recommended to edit the article if your a member of them. See Wikipedia:Ownership of content and your research have no citations you cannot put your original research over here. Don't do anything that triggers a block for you Aaaas216& (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Any reason to remove his appointment of 2ic 8 EBR from commands? That was his last Pakistan Army's appointment as he revolted being 2ic of 8 EBR and declared the Independence on behalf of Mujib. It's okay to remove Platoon Commander of PMA, but this is one of his most vital appointments. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 17:42, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Rahman was the second in command of 8 EB. He may revolted against his commanding officer but he was not in charge of that unit. The command section need to include the units, forces or brigades that Rahman commanded directly, with few major appointments tied with army headquarters. The 8 EBR was assimilated with Z forces under Rahman but it was commanded by Major A. J. M. Aminul Haque during the liberation war. Aaaas216& (talk) 01:15, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 04:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Just letting you know that in this edit to the Ferdous Hasan Salim article, you mistakenly proposed it for deletion with PRODBLP, as it already had 3 citations. You're only supposed to use that process if a BLP is completely unreferenced. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 02:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

You also did it here at the MA Halim article, which had 2 citations. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 02:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Matiur Rahman (Bir Sreshtho), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Voting for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 11:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iqbal Karim Bhuiyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuwait Liberation Medal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

May I know why you are removing my edits to the Faridpur article? ইমন (talk) 07:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Why are you proposing random removals on Wikimedia Commons? ইমন (talk) 08:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image deletion proposal has been made by an user of Wikimedia commons, it seems your images lack Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), consult with the Wikimedia commons user who has put inquiry to delete your images. Aaaas216& (talk) 10:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jay8g [V•T•E] 08:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Unusual uses of the word "ameliorate" have been creeping into articles, such as in this edit of yours. I've never seen the word used this way; it may not mean quite what you think. Although sometimes defined as "make better", it is only used when something bad is made a bit less bad. For example:

• Y The suffering of the flood victims was ameliorated by donated food and water. [They've still lost loved ones, their homes, their crops, etc., but their situation has improved a little]
• N The ice cream was ameliorated with whipped cream and a cherry on top. [Ice cream is already good, so enhancing it isn't ameliorating it]

In the articles where I've been seeing it recently, another word like expand, improve, promote, or transform would be the right word to clearly convey what is meant. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

I see, I did not know the proper definition, thank you :) Aaaas216& (talk) 11:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Ziaur Rahman. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:27, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Border Guard Bangladesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Ckfasdf (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Brig Azmi was promoted to three star via retrospective promotion. There was enough reference as well. Why did u revert it? ~2026-10593-35 (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The sources you provided does not indicate his promotions. It says they all promoted but none says Azmi was promoted to lt gen. See Wikipedia:No original research Aaaas216& (talk) 06:49, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

lol you are too outdated so don't edit in wiki.~2026-10810-87 (talk) 11:55, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Aaaas216&:,

I noticed you reverted my two recent edits to the Muhammad Yunus article infobox. I was trying to add his current position as Chairman of the Yunus Centre (which he founded in 2008 and resumed after resigning as Chief Adviser on 17 February 2026) and to reorder the offices so the past interim government role is not placed above his ongoing primary affiliation.

From what I can see in recent reliable sources:

• He returned to the Yunus Centre and resumed his former duties there on 22 February 2026 (e.g., [TBS News report](https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/yunus-returns-former-duties-after-18-months-chief-adviser-1056789), [The Print](https://theprint.in/diplomacy/yunus-returns-to-think-tank-after-18-months-as-chief-adviser-amid-speculations-of-presidential-role/2860956)).
• The Yunus Centre describes him as its chairman since July 2008 (official site: https://www.muhammadyunus.org/).

I believe this information is accurate, well-sourced, and relevant for the infobox (per WP:INFBOX and WP:RECENTISM – current long-term role over concluded temporary one).

Could you kindly explain what specific issue(s) you saw with those additions? Did I make any factual errors, sourcing problems, formatting mistakes, or violate any guideline? I would genuinely like to understand so I can improve the edit and reach consensus.

I have also started a discussion on the article talk page here: Click…

Thank you in advance for your time and explanation.

Best regards, Eastiak shoron (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

It is not a Wikipedia:GNG, offices. Your edits are resembling Wikipedia:PUFFERY rather than encyclopedic due to emotional attachments of Yunus's recent contributions Aaaas216& (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply and for explaining your reasoning.

I respectfully disagree that WP:GNG applies here. The Muhammad Yunus article already exists and meets notability through extensive coverage (Nobel Prize, Grameen Bank, etc.). Adding or reordering his current chairmanship of the Yunus Centre (a verifiable, long-term role he resumed after resigning as Chief Adviser in February 2026) is a content/weight issue, not a notability one for offices/roles within the article.

Regarding WP:PUFFERY (WP:PUFFERY / Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Puffery), I agree we must avoid promotional language. My proposed infobox addition was very simple. Those were very neutral and factual—no peacock terms or emotional exaggeration.

My intent is purely encyclopedic: reflect his current primary affiliation (Yunus Centre chairman since 2008, ongoing post-interim government) alongside his past role, per WP:INFOBOX (prioritize current/long-term roles for living persons) and WP:RECENTISM (avoid over-emphasizing concluded temporary positions).

Thanks again for your input… I appreciate the feedback and want to get this right per policy.

Best,

Eastiak shoron (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

don't cramped up the infoboxes Aaaas216& (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello Aaaas216&, you have been blocked for 2 weeks from editing the article about Muhammad Yunus directly. If you would like to appeal this decision, see WP:GAB.

Please use the talk page of the article, Talk:Muhammad Yunus, not specific user talk pages, for discussion. If the discussion comes to a standstill, you may need a third opinion or an RfC.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

🫡 Aaaas216& (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Military articles related to Bangladesh. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 14:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Read Wikipedia:Ownership of content properly before coming here, Any works can be contributed in here and that warning tag you used are exclusively for overhauling in particular articles. if your having a dispute go to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Aaaas216& (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! Emdad Tafsir   ◀ Talk ▶ 08:37, 28 February 2026 (UTC)