User talk:Abdullah1099

@Abdullah1099 Please try to no longer concern yourself with me.

This is the 3rd time i am telling you to let it go.

Saying this very heavily implies that i had did something so wrong and you are a lot better than me and i need you're approval and i think you know this.

I've tried to WP:AGF but this is just patronizing.

I am going to warn you one more time WP:LETITGO and no longer concern yourself with what i am doing. Good actions only (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Good actions only bro, I was only simply appreciating you for your today's article and my intention was to not hurt you by any means. If this is concerning then no problem. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok well if that is the case then i thank you but i can assure you its no longer needed.

Have a good day Good actions only

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page GSC 06214-00210 b, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

You correctly commented on the idea, not the person here, but "stupid" is still a little harsh. I suggest using less forceful language in future to prevent misunderstandings and avoid escalating potential conflicts. Toadspike [Talk] 00:20, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok, I changed stupid to bad Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:39, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, that's better. Toadspike [Talk] 02:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Airsat (satellite), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Abdullah1099! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:32, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I saw you opened Talk:TOI-1853 b/GA1, but stated that you want a more experienced reviewer to actually do the review. When you start a review like that, it's denoted as 'under review' and others will not find it and finish it for you.

I'm deleting the review, but you are welcome to open it if you will commit to a full review.

Before doing so, please have a look at existing reviews. They go further than just saying it meets the criteria and offer suggestions on how to improve the article. WP:GAMENTORs can help you at the end if your review. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

I think i will commit full review after knowing all the rules. Abdullah1099 (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of spaceflight launches in April–June 2026, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:01, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Very very thanks you @JeBonSer for the AfCing RSGC1-F01 Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proton-M, a link pointing to the disambiguation page SES was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'm helping on the "202X in spaceflight" pages and when I reorganised the Transporter-16 list of payloads I chose to put everything in alphabetic order, just putting before the satellites and after the cubesat/pocketsat; I've seen you edit to move the ION and the Vigoride at the beginning of the list, can you explain the reason behind that? Is there a set of rules I'm missing? Hainzgrimmer (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

The reason is consistency, you can see similar on transporter launch that happened before Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Would that means that if I update all the Transporter payload lists then put all the payload in alphabetical order is ok? Just because I can't find a reason to put ION and Vigoride in front of all the others Hainzgrimmer (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

@Hainzgrimmer, If you want you can do it there is no problem in that but what the format i have seen from all the transporter mission happened before is: First layer these all ION, etc then second layer normal other satellite third cubesats and fourth all the picosats all layers in alphabetical order. Yeah, Your idea is also a very good one but doing it could take many hours Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:54, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, I suppose I can treat it as a bit of a side project! Just to clarify, you mean that the first layer should include all the Space Tugs, right? If so, in the latest list of Transport-16 payloads, Exotrail’s Spacevan-002 should also be moved up the list. Hainzgrimmer (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, That is what i have seen but this format felt weird to me. Yeah, You can move Spacevan-002 to first layer. Unfortunately, I couldn't have enough time for spaceflight for many reasons but i will work soon on them Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Then since we both find weird that layer disposition what about I start reducing it to 3 layers:

- satellites (tugs included)

- cubesats

- picosats

obviously keeping the alphabetical order for each layer. Again, not a big deal for me to work on reordering them! I just want an "agreement" on the rule of order before start xD Hainzgrimmer (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, I think the idea is good Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)