User talk:Abrarward

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Economy of Malaysia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

yes it is I put imf estimate Abrarward (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Abrarward! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Shabnur and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word.
Also, biographiess.com is not a reliable source. Most websites are not. Exceptions include mainstream newspapers/magazines, refereed electronic journals, and university, library, and government collections of data. Worldbruce (talk) 06:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate your concern. I admit i do not always give best references. I will try my best not to make this type of mistake again. Thank you Abrarward (talk) 06:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Purnima (Bangladeshi actress), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Sure Abrarward (talk) 10:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I have fixed the reference Abrarward (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chittagonian language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi there,

yes you are false.

I have given quite a few good evidence that chittagongian is no longer considered a language anymore. Some english speakers identified this wrongly. Abrarward (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

I have given a big detials on how chittagongian language is no longer a language and is a dialect now. there was confusion in the past due to some different words but today its the same language . (PDF) Language Shift and Maintenance of Chittagonian Language towards Standard Bengali Language Abrarward (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Chittagonian language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on a page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page. —C.Fred (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

i have talked to meghmollar and he said i can put my sentences on

so it is not correct that i have not reached consensu

i did agreed to edit my sentence more clearly Abrarward (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Looking at the talk page, he said the opposite. —C.Fred (talk) 03:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

no i had a discussion with him and he said i can add my sentence without disrupting the first sentence please see it carefully thank you Abrarward (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

I looked again. However, you can add your sources but do not change the lead sentence. is clear; your edits did change the lead sentence. —C.Fred (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

ok i made a mistake i tried to edit without removing lead sentence i am just lazy to do it all over again so i tried to fix it that way by undoing meghmollar edit Abrarward (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Chittagonian language. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Your comments directed at other editors in the Writing system section are unacceptable. —C.Fred (talk) 20:51, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi dear,

Could you please tell me which one Abrarward (talk) 11:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

I'll pull the diff in a minute, but please do not address me as "dear". That is overly familiar. —C.Fred (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

I apologize for this

But however chittagong is mainly of bengali speakers and some people are not even aware i wonder why? Noakhali and rohingya people together live in chittagong areas and some of these people also live abroad which adds to the chatgaiya language. Chittagong is multi lingual Abrarward (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

And this is the comment in question. —C.Fred (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Secular State. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Baqotun0023 (talk) 10:12, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi

please explain what kind hoaxes i restored in wikipedia. Amibigous countries are those where the country is confused whether it is secular or religious. Bangladesh is as such as the country has both freedom of religion and state religion. As such, Bangladesh qualifies as a confusing ambigious state. I think you are not aware of how ambigious countries work. You should not edit unless you know this. Please do not remove someones edit or i will report you for removing correct edits Abrarward (talk) 11:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

What I mean is the country Syria, unlike Bangladesh which you said that, they was illegally changed its constitution. Syria does not explicitly recognize that it is a Muslim (religious) country. Baqotun0023 (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

yes ok but however bangladesh also has freedom of religion in its constituion Abrarward (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)