User talk:Ache Erie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Renee Petropoulos have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Renee Petropoulos was changed by Ache Erie (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905145 on 2025-09-21T00:00:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

I made multiple mistakes and was confused on how to link a subject. since then I have figured it out. thank you Ache Erie (talk) 18:29, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob & Bob has been accepted

Bob & Bob, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for looking at the article, and the feedback. Ache Erie (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 18:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I had no idea, and will keep this in mind for future articles. Didn't mean to try and do all that again, as I should've checked editing history, lesson learned. Ache Erie (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karen Carson

Karen Carson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Stoll (artist)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ache Erie (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Stoll (artist)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ache Erie (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Halloween, Riddler costume recreation by George Stoll.png

Thank you for uploading File:Halloween, Riddler costume recreation by George Stoll.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 04:55, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm confident that the use of this low-resolution image to support the encyclopedic discussion in this article, as explained in the file uploaded below, falls within fair use of the artist’s artwork.
Let me now explain how the artist's work, an appropriation art and reproduction of a potentially copyrighted object, falls under the same fair use grounds, as it is also intended to support the artist's discussion of how the public is marketed to by critiquing consumer culture through a recontextualized object meant for contemplation. That is different in material from the consumable version it imitates and will not affect the product's commercial viability, as it appears.
These are the same reasons why in Pop Art’s use of products (Campbell's Soup Cans) and their logos falls under fair use, and why images of those artworks are presented here in Wikipedia and are acceptable as fair use for the same reasons I've explained for this image. Ache Erie (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Bob & Bob, Oh Great, Now What.png

Thank you for uploading File:Bob & Bob, Oh Great, Now What.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the film may not meet, can be obtained by going to the file description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the file description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the file page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 13:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know it was unclear how the image related to the article. I added more information on why this image is important and how it supports the discussion in this article and the media data rationale. Please read those and see why this image is appropriate and important to this article. Thank you for your help in this matter. Ache Erie (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
The event captured in the photograph is described very superficially in the article (1.5 sentences). I don't think we can add a non-free image to every 1.5 sentence in our articles. — Ирука13 12:52, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Steve Hurd TwitterShitter.png

Thank you for uploading File:Steve Hurd TwitterShitter.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the film may not meet, can be obtained by going to the file description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the file description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the file page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 14:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Steve Hurd TwitterShitter.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Steve Hurd TwitterShitter.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 14:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ache Erie. Thank you for your work on James Gobel. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI